Talk:Post-quantum cryptography: Difference between revisions
→top: proj/rate |
→Rationale for no link to PQ companies.: new section |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Distinct from the research into public-key crypto, there's history and research about the practicalities of living *without* the mathematical/complexity assumptions that underlie most PKC: key negotiation including via multiple third parties, hash signatures, etc. Don't have the round tuits quite yet (and it doesn't really belong in this specific article), but throwing it out there if it piques anyone else's interest. |
Distinct from the research into public-key crypto, there's history and research about the practicalities of living *without* the mathematical/complexity assumptions that underlie most PKC: key negotiation including via multiple third parties, hash signatures, etc. Don't have the round tuits quite yet (and it doesn't really belong in this specific article), but throwing it out there if it piques anyone else's interest. |
||
== Rationale for no link to PQ companies. == |
|||
I'm unfamiliar with how to mention some user such as 46.249.209.132, someone please modify this and help me out with a link on my user talk page. |
|||
Post-quantum cryptography (and anything with the word "quantum" in it) are at the frontier of technological advancement. Any mention to an entity who claim to specialize in such field would be strongly misleading and biased endorsement. |
|||
post-quantum.com may indeed be a PQ company, but Security Innovation and its subsidiaries (if I'm not mistaken) had specialized in NTRU for perhaps far longer than most other people, yet we still do not give them mention on this page. |
Revision as of 02:09, 11 September 2016
Cryptography: Computer science C‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Cryptography without/before PKC
Distinct from the research into public-key crypto, there's history and research about the practicalities of living *without* the mathematical/complexity assumptions that underlie most PKC: key negotiation including via multiple third parties, hash signatures, etc. Don't have the round tuits quite yet (and it doesn't really belong in this specific article), but throwing it out there if it piques anyone else's interest.
Rationale for no link to PQ companies.
I'm unfamiliar with how to mention some user such as 46.249.209.132, someone please modify this and help me out with a link on my user talk page.
Post-quantum cryptography (and anything with the word "quantum" in it) are at the frontier of technological advancement. Any mention to an entity who claim to specialize in such field would be strongly misleading and biased endorsement.
post-quantum.com may indeed be a PQ company, but Security Innovation and its subsidiaries (if I'm not mistaken) had specialized in NTRU for perhaps far longer than most other people, yet we still do not give them mention on this page.