User talk:75.108.94.227: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 04:59, 12 December 2015

lastmod: User_talk:Lowercase sigmabot III at 2015-12-12 @ 04:59 Z
modWas: 9 years ago , based on page-reload at 2024-12-12 @ 15:36 Z
version: mediaWiki 1.44.0-wmf.6 (d77bde6)

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

File:OstrichHead.JPG

This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

We will not, I think get one this year

We may, however, get a non admin next year. But what I would prefer is that decent and broadly based editors perform the task regardless of whether or not they are admins. There is nothing special about janitorial supplies. I have created a thing linked from my user page about why I will not be one. You probably understand this since you will not get an account. The questions are the same in each case, and, while important to the questioner, are not to the questionee.

Missed? I think not. No-one is missed on Wikipedia. If our esteemed founder upped and left we would not turn a hair. Unless we were Trump, of course. He turns several. I have the time to remain in the AfC pond, certainly in the shallow end. It is the extra time that I allocated that is curtailed. The former is fun, the latter is a kind of duty. If I would have had to cut down on th pleasant pastime to perform only the duty then the duty would soon become intolerable. We must always keep a balance. unsigned message from Timtrent ... reply still open in some other tab ... too many tabs! :-)

Mandy, it's blowing!!!

	Mandy, it's blowing!!!
	Mandy, it's blowing!!! Hafspajen (talk) 17:57, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HI!! Hihi! Good bye! (A classic), see North's page. Hafspajen (talk) 17:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teaparty

Teaparty
Nautiluspokal
The End of Dinner
Proud white peacock

Wow, nice goblet. But Mandy, how do you drink, without getting a little lizard up your nostril? :-) 75.108.94.227 (talk) 11:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OH, lost my teaparty - nice to know it got in where it should be. OH, no, no lizzards, uhuuuhuh. WHY only the lead? Hafspajen (talk) 12:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lazy lazy , in the daisies , lolly-gag lolly-gag , all the way home :-) There is your reason, you brutal taskmaster! ;-) I also managed to mess up the infobox, though, that should count for something.... 75.108.94.227 (talk) 13:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MEEE?? Brutal? I am crying. We now can be proud, and chill out now, it's not blowing any more. Just be happy with the hard work. And hope and glory. Hafspajen (talk) 14:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are a delightful person, except when you are sending me and agent nejapsfaH out on some kind of a Mission! Then you turn from happy-nice-polite scandinavian artist-type, into Vicious Viking Va... Vu... oh crap, don't know any more good words that start with V. ...Nevermind that! Brutal indeed, vicious even!!11!! Think of all the dangerous wiki-tasks you have handed out! "Agent nejapsfaH -- take out that copyvio!" (pow zap) "Agent nejapsfaH -- somebody has sent in the WP:PEACOCK, time to cold cock it!!" (boom zing) "Agent nejapsfaH -- put some nice pictures on that page, stat!" (err...) Actually that last task is not so brutal and vicious. But the exception proves the rule, don't distract me, there is a WP:POINT to all this silly stuff, I'm sure. ;-) 75.108.94.227 (talk) 14:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT Viking Expansion? Mandy, You are awfull, but never mind, I like you anyway. Yes, agent nejapsfaH is flying all over the continent on different assessments right now. Do you think Donald Truph will be the next president? He might be... Hafspajen (talk) 15:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What 's happening here |Mandy? This page is so short that it is scary. Hafspajen (talk) 15:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Something to watch while relaxing: The drama fever. Hafspajen (talk) 16:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 with bullet points grouped by state of origin

Draft:Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 with bullet points grouped by state of origin, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 with bullet points grouped by state of origin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 with bullet points grouped by state of origin during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:43, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from Nathan^T 14:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Filled out my survey. Nathan^T 14:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, appreciated. You can see the rolling-results in WP:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-12-09/Arbitration_report (draft *begins* on the 9th, publication happens this weekend ... despite the name will be out the 12th or 13th), if you like. Best, 75.108.94.227 (talk) 15:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from jps (talk) 14:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. jps (talk) 14:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, also appreciated. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 15:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from LaMona (talk) 15:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Didn't answer all. LaMona (talk) 15:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Polls so far

Well I'm starting to notice this exit poll was a terrible idea. GamerPro64 15:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh? Are you getting emails that say as much? Or are you having technical difficulties of some type? I'm slowly plowing through the on-wiki results, on this end. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 15:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Check my talk page. GamerPro64 15:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 75.108.94.227, since I'm told pinging is impossible for IP addresses, yes please see GP's talk page. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am there. Have been since they asked me to peek, just kept edit-conflicting, actually. :-) And yeah, impossible to ping anons. Best, 75.108.94.227 (talk) 15:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We're in deep now. The Arbitrators have been announced. Now we really have something to write about. GamerPro64 19:36, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scrutineers on the ball this year! :-) Doing rolling results must have helped speed things up, I was expecting the finalization to take at least another week. Are you wanting to do quick interviews with the new arbs, for this weekend's piece being published Dec ~12th? Or ping them about some interview-questions now, but then publish in the "2015-12-16" signpost ArbReport to be published Dec ~19th? Best, 75.108.94.227 (talk) 20:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We should probably let our EiC know first. @Go Phightins!: is it okay if we do interviews on the newly elected Arbitrators. GamerPro64 20:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. And since results are posted, I assume it is truly finalized... but I see only two of the three scrutineers is listed in the certifying-area ... are all three required, for the results to be considered bulletproof? Or is it two-out-of-three? 75.108.94.227 (talk) 20:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from JoJan (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

I answered the quick and easy exit poll. JoJan (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from Csisc (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

I have submitted my answers to your Signpost questions in my talk page.

Yours Sincerely, --Csisc (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from Thargor Orlando (talk) 15:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

All set. Thargor Orlando (talk) 15:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from Buster Seven Talk 16:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Exit poll completed. Buster Seven Talk 16:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from Corinne (talk) 18:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Replied to poll questions. Corinne (talk) 18:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Exit poll questionnaire has been answered. Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 19:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Filled mine. I decided not to participate in the exit poll. Thanks! - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 19:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem whatsoever. Thank you anyways. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from Deor (talk) 20:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

I've declined to answer the questions (save for Q#0). Deor (talk) 20:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from P.T. Aufrette (talk) 20:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Answered, mostly just to say I don't believe in numeric metrics and thresholds. — P.T. Aufrette (talk) 20:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from Mirokado (talk) 23:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

what the heading says! Mirokado (talk) 23:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from starship.paint ~ KO 01:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Did it on user talk. starship.paint ~ KO 01:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I also let GamerPro64 know, although I didn't do it by email. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from maclean (talk) 05:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Responded, as requested. maclean (talk) 05:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from Elias Z 07:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

-Elias Z 07:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Short answers on my talk page. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 11:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

All done and ready, on my talk page. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from prat (talk) 22:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

All done at my talk page. prat (talk) 22:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2015 exit poll answers from Jd2718 (talk) 00:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

I answered. Jd2718 (talk) 00:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 :::What 's happening here [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJmg-879j5o |Mandy]? This page is so short that it is scary. [[User:Hafspajen|Hafspajen]] ([[User talk:Hafspajen|talk]]) 15:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 ;Something to watch while relaxing: [http://www.dramafever.com/drama/4738/4/When_I_See_You_Again/ The drama fever]. [[User:Hafspajen|Hafspajen]] ([[User talk:Hafspajen|talk]]) 16:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
-== Thank you ==
-For your research, time, and response to the ACE template discussion.  I will follow through on the links, and continue to value the input. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 08:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
-What does the term "bangvote" mean? — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 15:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
-: See [[WP:BANGVOTE]] aka [[WP:!VOTE]].  I'm actually surprised the former <s>is</s> <ins>was</ins> a redlink!  :-)  &nbsp; &nbsp; In the case of arbcom elections, it is somewhat untrue to call it a [[WP:NOTVOTE]], since the results *are* calculated by counting noses in supports-divided-by-sum-of-supports-and-opposes fashion with no leeway for the scrutineers to elide non-policy-backed bangvotes.  But I still like to call arbcom-election-proceedings bangvoting, since it is "not voting" when compared to e.g. real world political elections.  p.s. If your question was about the "bang" portion, that is programmer-speak for the exclamation-mark, see [[Jargon File]] for the putative origin of such cutesy terminology (e.g. the asterisk is 'splat' in certain circles).  Specifically see sense one at http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/B/bang.html  [[Special:Contributions/75.108.94.227|75.108.94.227]] ([[User talk:75.108.94.227#top|talk]]) 16:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
-::Mwuahahah I created [[WP:BANGVOTE]], now you look '''crazy''' for suggesting it was a red link! Для Родины! -- [[User:Samtar|samtar]] <sup><small>[[User_talk:Samtar|whisper]]</small></sup> 16:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
-::: [[In Soviet Russia]], arbcom bangvotes ''you''!  :-)  &nbsp; &nbsp; Thanks, my friend.  [[Special:Contributions/75.108.94.227|75.108.94.227]] ([[User talk:75.108.94.227#top|talk]]) 16:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
-:::: :-D Thanks folks — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;">&nbsp;?&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 16:56, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 ==MfD nomination of [[Draft:Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 with bullet points grouped by state of origin]]==