Jump to content

User talk:Gekay job solutions: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notifying about suspicion of sockpuppeteering. (TW)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
|[[File:Puppeter template.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=]]
|[[File:Puppeter template.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=]]
}} [[user:220 of Borg|'''220''']] [[Special:Contributions/220 of Borg|''<small>of</small>'']] <sup>[[User talk:220 of Borg|''Borg'']]</sup> 11:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
}} [[user:220 of Borg|'''220''']] [[Special:Contributions/220 of Borg|''<small>of</small>'']] <sup>[[User talk:220 of Borg|''Borg'']]</sup> 11:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|I AM CURRENTLY BLOKED DUE TO SOCKPUPPET SO WHAT CAN I DO FOR UNBLOCK}}

Revision as of 04:52, 23 October 2015

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gekay job solutions (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

due to mutiple account

Decline reason:

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account is being used only for spam or advertising and your username is a violation of the username policy. Therefore this account will remain blocked. For any other or additional reasons, please see your talk page archives or talk page history. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also please note that the warning you received for sockpuppetry, since deleted, remains visible and is in itself a solid reason to deny you unblock. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gekay job solutions (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unlock my account.this is due user name violation Gekay job solutions (talk) 01:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It does not appear that you read the previous decline above. Kuru (talk) 01:46, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gekay job solutions, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

220 of Borg 11:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Gekay job solutions (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I AM CURRENTLY BLOKED DUE TO SOCKPUPPET SO WHAT CAN I DO FOR UNBLOCK

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I AM CURRENTLY BLOKED DUE TO SOCKPUPPET SO WHAT CAN I DO FOR UNBLOCK |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I AM CURRENTLY BLOKED DUE TO SOCKPUPPET SO WHAT CAN I DO FOR UNBLOCK |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I AM CURRENTLY BLOKED DUE TO SOCKPUPPET SO WHAT CAN I DO FOR UNBLOCK |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}