Udwadia–Kalaba formulation: Difference between revisions
add pop sci ref |
rm redundant ref |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Udwadia–Kalaba equation''' <ref>Udwadia, F.E.; Kalaba, R.E. (1996). ''Analytical Dynamics: A New Approach.'' Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-04833-8</ref> is a method for deriving the equations of motion of a constrained mechanical system. This equation was discovered by Firdaus E. Udwadia and Robert E. Kalaba in 1992. The fundamental equation is the simplest and most comprehensive equation so far discovered <ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1098/rspa.1992.0158 | last1 = Udwadia | first1 = F.E. | last2 = Kalaba | first2 = R.E. | year = 1992 | title = A new perspective on constrained motion | url = http://ae-www.usc.edu/bio/udwadia/papers/A_new_perspective.pdf | journal = Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A | volume = 439 | issue = 1906| pages = 407–410 |bibcode = 1992RSPSA.439..407U }}</ref> for writing down the equations of motion of a constrained mechanical system. The equation even generalizes to constraint forces that do not obey [[D'Alembert's principle]]<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Udwadia | first1 = F. E. | last2 = Kalaba | first2 = R. E. | title = On the Foundations of Analytical Dynamics | journal = Intl. Journ. Nonlinear Mechanics | volume = 37 | issue = 6 | pages = 1079-1090 | date = 2002 | url = http://ae-www.usc.edu/bio/udwadia/papers/On_foundation_of_analytical_dynamics.pdf | doi = 10.1016/S0020-7462(01)00033-6}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | last = Calverley | first = Bob | title = Constrained or Unconstrained, That Is the Equation | newspaper = USC News | date = 2001 | url = http://news.usc.edu/4633/Constrained-or-Unconstrained-That-Is-the-Equation/ }}</ref>. |
The '''Udwadia–Kalaba equation''' <ref name=uk1996>Udwadia, F.E.; Kalaba, R.E. (1996). ''Analytical Dynamics: A New Approach.'' Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-04833-8</ref> is a method for deriving the equations of motion of a constrained mechanical system. This equation was discovered by Firdaus E. Udwadia and Robert E. Kalaba in 1992. The fundamental equation is the simplest and most comprehensive equation so far discovered <ref name=uk1992>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1098/rspa.1992.0158 | last1 = Udwadia | first1 = F.E. | last2 = Kalaba | first2 = R.E. | year = 1992 | title = A new perspective on constrained motion | url = http://ae-www.usc.edu/bio/udwadia/papers/A_new_perspective.pdf | journal = Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A | volume = 439 | issue = 1906| pages = 407–410 |bibcode = 1992RSPSA.439..407U }}</ref> for writing down the equations of motion of a constrained mechanical system. The equation even generalizes to constraint forces that do not obey [[D'Alembert's principle]]<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Udwadia | first1 = F. E. | last2 = Kalaba | first2 = R. E. | title = On the Foundations of Analytical Dynamics | journal = Intl. Journ. Nonlinear Mechanics | volume = 37 | issue = 6 | pages = 1079-1090 | date = 2002 | url = http://ae-www.usc.edu/bio/udwadia/papers/On_foundation_of_analytical_dynamics.pdf | doi = 10.1016/S0020-7462(01)00033-6}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | last = Calverley | first = Bob | title = Constrained or Unconstrained, That Is the Equation | newspaper = USC News | date = 2001 | url = http://news.usc.edu/4633/Constrained-or-Unconstrained-That-Is-the-Equation/ }}</ref>. |
||
== The central problem of constrained motion == |
== The central problem of constrained motion == |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
== Equation of motion == |
== Equation of motion == |
||
The solution to this central problem is given by the Udwadia–Kalaba equation. When the matrix <math>\mathbf{M}</math> is positive definite, the equation of motion of the constrained system <math>S_c</math>, at each instant of time, is<ref |
The solution to this central problem is given by the Udwadia–Kalaba equation. When the matrix <math>\mathbf{M}</math> is positive definite, the equation of motion of the constrained system <math>S_c</math>, at each instant of time, is<ref name=uk1992/><ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1016/0016-0032(93)90099-G | last1 = Udwadia | first1 = F.E. | last2 = Kalaba | first2 = R.E. | year = 1993 | title = On motion | url = http://ae-www.usc.edu/bio/udwadia/papers/On_Motion.pdf | journal = Journal of the Franklin Institute | volume = 330 | issue = 3| pages = 571–577 }}</ref> |
||
:<math> \mathbf{M}\ddot{\mathbf{q}} = \mathbf{Q} + \mathbf{M}^{1/2}\left(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{M}^{-1/2}\right)^+(\mathbf{b}-\mathbf{A}\mathbf{M}^{-1}\mathbf{Q}), </math> |
:<math> \mathbf{M}\ddot{\mathbf{q}} = \mathbf{Q} + \mathbf{M}^{1/2}\left(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{M}^{-1/2}\right)^+(\mathbf{b}-\mathbf{A}\mathbf{M}^{-1}\mathbf{Q}), </math> |
Revision as of 09:36, 29 July 2015
The Udwadia–Kalaba equation [1] is a method for deriving the equations of motion of a constrained mechanical system. This equation was discovered by Firdaus E. Udwadia and Robert E. Kalaba in 1992. The fundamental equation is the simplest and most comprehensive equation so far discovered [2] for writing down the equations of motion of a constrained mechanical system. The equation even generalizes to constraint forces that do not obey D'Alembert's principle[3][4].
The central problem of constrained motion
In the study of the dynamics of mechanical systems, the configuration of a given system is, in general, completely described by generalized coordinates so that its generalized coordinate -vector is given by
Using Newtonian or Lagrangian dynamics, the unconstrained equations of motion of the system under study can be derived as
where it is assumed that the initial conditions and are known. We call the system unconstrained because may be arbitrarily assigned. Here, the dots represent derivatives with respect to time. The by matrix is symmetric, and it can be positive definite or semi-positive definite . Typically, it is assumed that is positive definite; however, it is not uncommon to derive the unconstrained equations of motion of the system such that is only semi-positive definite; i.e., the mass matrix may be singular.[5][6] The -vector denotes the total generalized force impressed on the system; it can be expressible as the summation of all the conservative forces with the non-conservative forces.
Constraints
We now assume that the unconstrained system is subjected to a set of consistent equality constraints given by
where is a known m by n matrix of rank r and is a known m-vector. We note that this set of constraint equations encompass a very general variety of holonomic and non-holonomic equality constraints. For example, holonomic constraints of the form
can be differentiated twice with respect to time while non-holonomic constraints of the form
can be differentiated once with respect to time to obtain the by matrix and the -vector . In short, constraints may be specified that are (1) nonlinear functions of displacement and velocity, (2) explicitly dependent on time, and (3) functionally dependent.
As a consequence of subjecting these constraints to the unconstrained system , an additional force is conceptualized to arise, namely, the force of constraint. Therefore, the constrained system becomes
where —the constraint force—is the additional force needed to satisfy the imposed constraints. The central problem of constrained motion is now stated as follows:
1. given the unconstrained equations of motion of the system ,
2. given the generalized displacement and the generalized velocity of the constrained system at time , and
3. given the constraints in the form as stated above,
find the equations of motion for the constrained system—the acceleration—at time t, which is in accordance with the agreed upon principles of analytical dynamics.
Equation of motion
The solution to this central problem is given by the Udwadia–Kalaba equation. When the matrix is positive definite, the equation of motion of the constrained system , at each instant of time, is[2][7]
where the '+' symbol denotes the pseudoinverse of the matrix . The force of constraint is thus given explicitly as
and since the matrix is positive definite the generalized acceleration of the constrained system is determined explicitly by
In the case that the matrix is semi-positive definite , the above equation cannot be used directly because may be singular. Furthermore, the generalized accelerations may not be unique unless the by matrix
has full rank (rank = ).[5][6] But since the observed accelerations of mechanical systems in nature are always unique, this rank condition is a necessary and sufficient condition for obtaining the uniquely defined generalized accelerations of the constrained system at each instant of time. Thus, when has full rank, the equations of motion of the constrained system at each instant of time are uniquely determined by (1) creating the auxiliary unconstrained system[6]
and by (2) applying the fundamental equation of constrained motion to this auxiliary unconstrained system so that the auxiliary constrained equations of motion are explicitly given by[6]
Moreover, when the matrix has full rank, the matrix is always positive definite. This yields, explicitly, the generalized accelerations of the constrained system as
This equation is valid when the matrix is either positive definite or positive semi-definite! Additionally, the force of constraint that causes the constrained system —a system that may have a singular mass matrix —to satisfy the imposed constraints is explicitly given by
Non-ideal constraints
Suppose that the virtual work of a displacement is
The vector describes the non-ideality of the virtual work and may be related, for example, to a force of friction. This is a generalized D'Alembert's principle, where the usual form of the principle has vanishing virtual work with .
The Udwadia–Kalaba equation is modified by an additional non-ideal constraint term to
Example
The method can solve the inverse Kepler problem of determining the force law that corresponds to the orbits that are conic sections[8]. We take there to be no external forces (not even gravity) and instead constrain the particle motion to follow orbits of the form
where , is the eccentricity, and is the semi-latus rectum. Differentiating twice with respect to time and rearranging slightly gives a constraint
We also assume that angular momentum about the focus is conserved as
with time derivative
We can combine these two constraints into the matrix equation
The constraint matrix has inverse
We assume the body has a simple, constant mass. The force of constraint is therefore the expected, central inverse square law
References
- ^ Udwadia, F.E.; Kalaba, R.E. (1996). Analytical Dynamics: A New Approach. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-04833-8
- ^ a b Udwadia, F.E.; Kalaba, R.E. (1992). "A new perspective on constrained motion" (PDF). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A. 439 (1906): 407–410. Bibcode:1992RSPSA.439..407U. doi:10.1098/rspa.1992.0158.
- ^ Udwadia, F. E.; Kalaba, R. E. (2002). "On the Foundations of Analytical Dynamics" (PDF). Intl. Journ. Nonlinear Mechanics. 37 (6): 1079–1090. doi:10.1016/S0020-7462(01)00033-6.
- ^ Calverley, Bob (2001). "Constrained or Unconstrained, That Is the Equation". USC News.
- ^ a b Udwadia, F.E.; Phohomsiri, P. (2006). "Explicit equations of motion for constrained mechanical systems with singular mass matrices and applications to multi-body dynamics" (PDF). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A. 462 (2071): 2097–2117. Bibcode:2006RSPSA.462.2097U. doi:10.1098/rspa.2006.1662.
- ^ a b c d Udwadia, F.E.; Schutte, A.D. (2010). "Equations of motion for general constrained systems in Lagrangian mechanics" (PDF). Acta Mechanica. 213 (1): 111–129. doi:10.1007/s00707-009-0272-2.
- ^ Udwadia, F.E.; Kalaba, R.E. (1993). "On motion" (PDF). Journal of the Franklin Institute. 330 (3): 571–577. doi:10.1016/0016-0032(93)90099-G.
- ^ Zhang, Bingzhan; Zhen, Shengchao; Zhao, Han; Huang, Kang; Deng, Bin; Chen, Ye-Hwa (2015). "A novel study on Kepler's law and inverse square law of gravitation". Eur. J. Phys. 36. doi:10.1088/0143-0807/36/3/035018.