Jump to content

Talk:Second Sino-Japanese War: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 83: Line 83:


==About foreign support in sino-japanese war==
==About foreign support in sino-japanese war==
I don't want to make any edit war so I put my comment in the talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Zmflavius#About_foreign_support_in_sino-japanese_war] before. I can't understand why list British Empire as the foreign support but nothing detail in the article. When I read [[Second Sino-Japanese War]], it describes the support from soviet, US and even Germany but doesn't describe any support from Britain. I don't know why list Britain as a foreign support but did not write any detail in the article. Moreover, soviet and US all sent military adviser ([[Vasily Chuikov]] and [[Joseph Stilwell]]) to China. If you think Britain is one of the major foreign support for sino-Japanese war, can you add a reference to that article. It seems it is unsource contents now. If list Britain as a major support because it is the major power of Allies, then we can also list Netherlands, Australia and Canada because they are all major power of allies in Pacific war. For Burma Campaign, I think [[Battle of Northern Burma and Western Yunnan|north part of Burma Campaign]] was considered as part of sino-japanese war but it's hard to say the entire [[Burma Campaign]] was. Anyway Burma Campaign is the only relation between Britain and Sino-Japanese War. If you all consider the entire Burma Campaign was part of Sino-Japanese war, I can accept to list Britain as a major support. The problem is India and Canada also join the Burma Campaign and I wonder whether we need to add these two countries. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.181.173.116|24.181.173.116]] ([[User talk:24.181.173.116|talk]]) 05:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I don't want to make any edit war so I put my comment in the talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Zmflavius#About_foreign_support_in_sino-japanese_war] before. I can't understand why list British Empire as the foreign support but nothing detail in the article. When I read [[Second Sino-Japanese War]], it describes the support from soviet, US and even Germany but doesn't describe any support from Britain. I don't know why list Britain as a foreign support but did not write any detail in the article. Moreover, soviet and US all sent military adviser ([[Vasily Chuikov]] and [[Joseph Stilwell]]) to China. If you think Britain is one of the major foreign support for sino-Japanese war, can you add a reference to that article. It seems it is unsource contents now. If list Britain as a major support because it is the major power of Allies, then we can also list Netherlands, Australia and Canada because they are all major power of allies in Pacific war. For Burma Campaign, I think [[Battle of Northern Burma and Western Yunnan|north part of Burma Campaign]] was considered as part of sino-japanese war but it's hard to say the entire [[Burma Campaign]] was. Most of time, it seems British force and Chinese force were in the independent operation in Burma Campaign. Anyway Burma Campaign is the only relation between Britain and Sino-Japanese War. If you all consider the entire Burma Campaign was part of Sino-Japanese war, I can accept to list Britain as a major support. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.181.173.116|24.181.173.116]] ([[User talk:24.181.173.116|talk]]) 05:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 06:15, 7 June 2014

Former good article nomineeSecond Sino-Japanese War was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 22, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed

Template:Vital article

.

Martin B-10 raid over Japan

Chinese Martin B-10 bombers dropped leaflets over Japanese cities on May 19, 1938, to prove that the Chinese air force was capable of striking Japan.

http://books.google.com/books?id=s2NKutuUlA8C&pg=PA320#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=mpSkIrOCrQkC&pg=PA126#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=Re8pJnCXvWoC&pg=PA265#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=N6yy9mXwAEUC&pg=PA86#v=onepage&q&f=false

Boomerang Biological weapons attack which killed Japanese soldiers

Japanese biological weapons boomeranged on their own soldiers and resulted in 10,000 Japanese dead in 1942 in Chekiang (Zhejiang)

http://books.google.com/books?id=ZzlNgS70OHAC&pg=PA171#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 00:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good.Phead128 (talk) 04:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead needs rewrite

I've just tagged the article with "lead rewrite". Why? The lead section of the article does not summarize the main events of the war. The third paragraph is really odd, it contains very minor details about Winston Churchill's statements and nothing whatsoever about what happened between 1939 and 1945 in China! Wangedgar (talk) 02:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing video clip

Video clip entitled, The beginning of the war, is in fact a propaganda video by the USA for their reasons of being in the war. The majority of the clip only shows the USA military views on Chinese history and only in the last 1 minute or so gives their reasons why Japan invaded China. It should be removed for being biased or that there should be a note explaining the source of it and what it was used for.

Anonymous, 12:23, 11 January 2014, GMT

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:First Sino-Japanese War which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:13, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Tongchow Mutiny

The Tongchow Mutiny massacre at which Chinese soldiers raped and killed about 250 Japanese women and Children brutaly. This massacre gave strong impact to Japanese residents, especially in Shanghai. So, when Cian Kai-Sek approached to Shanghai and provoked in various way, many felt that be the second victim of Tongchow Mutiny. It was the one of main reason of 2nd Shanghai Incident. Later, Chinese became to insist IJA committed atrocities to which Tonchow Mutiny very resemble — Preceding unsigned comment added by Windersteinburg (talk • contribs) 22:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We don't use NPOV language like "provoke" especially when its unsourced, and speaking of provocation anyway, if we go by your original research logic,what were Japanese troops doing in China, killing and torturing civilians decades before the Tungchow mutiny? Japanese were torturing, killing, and raping civilians in China years before the Tungchow mutiny, such as in Unit 731 and the reason Japanese were even in Tungchow was because they invaded China first in the Marco Polo Bridge Incident and since the Mukden Incident. Rajmaan (talk) 23:52, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About foreign support in sino-japanese war

I don't want to make any edit war so I put my comment in the talk page [1] before. I can't understand why list British Empire as the foreign support but nothing detail in the article. When I read Second Sino-Japanese War, it describes the support from soviet, US and even Germany but doesn't describe any support from Britain. I don't know why list Britain as a foreign support but did not write any detail in the article. Moreover, soviet and US all sent military adviser (Vasily Chuikov and Joseph Stilwell) to China. If you think Britain is one of the major foreign support for sino-Japanese war, can you add a reference to that article. It seems it is unsource contents now. If list Britain as a major support because it is the major power of Allies, then we can also list Netherlands, Australia and Canada because they are all major power of allies in Pacific war. For Burma Campaign, I think north part of Burma Campaign was considered as part of sino-japanese war but it's hard to say the entire Burma Campaign was. Most of time, it seems British force and Chinese force were in the independent operation in Burma Campaign. Anyway Burma Campaign is the only relation between Britain and Sino-Japanese War. If you all consider the entire Burma Campaign was part of Sino-Japanese war, I can accept to list Britain as a major support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.181.173.116 (talk) 05:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Second_Sino-Japanese_War&oldid=611914533"