Jump to content

Talk:Cambridge Five: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 50.43.43.48 - "Added note about Peter Wright allegations."
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Cambridge Five/Archives/2013/November. (BOT)
Line 26: Line 26:
|box-advert=yes
|box-advert=yes
}}
}}

== Allies ==
These articles need to make it clear that the Soviet Union was Britain's ally during WW2. These guys were not passing information to an enemy. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/193.113.57.165|193.113.57.165]] ([[User talk:193.113.57.165|talk]]) 18:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Plus one for adding this information, and what the Cambridge Five actually did [[User:Jonpatterns|Jonpatterns]] ([[User talk:Jonpatterns|talk]]) 13:51, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


== Peter Wright allegations ==
== Peter Wright allegations ==

Revision as of 21:43, 31 January 2014

Peter Wright allegations

If the article continues to include a list of accused "5th men", it should include Roger Hollis in the list. The academic consensus today is that Wright's allegation against Hollis was false, and the article should say so. But the accuracy of Wright's information about other then-secret information (e.g. Venona) still makes Wright a formidable reference in this shadowy subject area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.43.43.48 (talk) 05:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]