Talk:Outline of open educational resources: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
added class banner |
→Discussion captured from Sept 10 lab: new section |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* "Cite Book" template with documentation: [[:Template:Cite book]] |
* "Cite Book" template with documentation: [[:Template:Cite book]] |
||
-[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 16:27, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |
-[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 16:27, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Discussion captured from Sept 10 lab == |
|||
===== [[open knowledge]] vs. [[public domain]] ===== |
|||
* open knowledge would be the broader concept, to include practices that are inclusive as well as commonly owned, with public domain providing a specific focus on the issue of intellectual property |
|||
===== [[open learning]] vs. [[open education]] ===== |
|||
* open learning = open education as the organizing principle |
|||
* does open learning imply [[informal education|informal]], and open education imply [[formal education|formal]]? |
|||
* a single article should ultimately cover both |
|||
* the origins seem really different, with open ed being related more to institutions doing "open things" and open learning being tracked back to movements like [[Montessori education|Montessori]]. Clearly they could be re-defined as equal in principle, but I found that difference interesting. |
|||
* the beginning of the movement was often assumed to be [[MIT OpenCourseWare|MIT's launch of open materials in 2001]] (see [[open education#History|open education]] and [[open educational resources#History|open educational resources]]) |
|||
* Open education as a way to organize types of learning experiences that can emphasize access to traditional ed institutions (including [[Open University]] historically, [[MOOCs]] today), can emphasize open educational resources, and that can promote use of [[open educational resources]] in traditional settings or involve a a very broad commitment to [[open educational practices]] with specific goals such as open education for development/[[Open Learning for Development|open learning for development]] |
|||
* perhaps we can ultimately better differentiate the open learning and open education articles to articulate the historical differences re terminology |
|||
===== hierarchy/ies of concepts ===== |
|||
* leverage [[Wikipedia:COMMOER|Communicate OER]] into new [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Open|WikiProject Open]], in synthesis with [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Open Access|WikiProject Open Access]] and others |
|||
* [[open educational resources|OER]] DOES need to figure prominently. perhaps there are multiple hierarchies here |
|||
* a good help would be to go over how to keep this going (the open project) with reminders about how to get to various places to work on it. |
Revision as of 11:04, 11 September 2013
This article was the subject of an educational assignment. Further details are available on the course page. |
Getting started with Outline pages as part of WIKISOO --ggatin (talk) 15:46, 10 September 2013 (UTC) Added a reference to a source about Heutagogy. --ggatin (talk) 16:04, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Citation help
Since there are a number of new Wikipedia contributors working on this page, here are a couple of useful resources for creating citations:
- How to create nicely formatted citations on Wikipedia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifjj4zGTH7U
- "Cite Book" template with documentation: Template:Cite book
-Pete (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Discussion captured from Sept 10 lab
- open knowledge would be the broader concept, to include practices that are inclusive as well as commonly owned, with public domain providing a specific focus on the issue of intellectual property
- open learning = open education as the organizing principle
- a single article should ultimately cover both
- the origins seem really different, with open ed being related more to institutions doing "open things" and open learning being tracked back to movements like Montessori. Clearly they could be re-defined as equal in principle, but I found that difference interesting.
- the beginning of the movement was often assumed to be MIT's launch of open materials in 2001 (see open education and open educational resources)
- Open education as a way to organize types of learning experiences that can emphasize access to traditional ed institutions (including Open University historically, MOOCs today), can emphasize open educational resources, and that can promote use of open educational resources in traditional settings or involve a a very broad commitment to open educational practices with specific goals such as open education for development/open learning for development
- perhaps we can ultimately better differentiate the open learning and open education articles to articulate the historical differences re terminology
hierarchy/ies of concepts
- leverage Communicate OER into new WikiProject Open, in synthesis with WikiProject Open Access and others
- OER DOES need to figure prominently. perhaps there are multiple hierarchies here
- a good help would be to go over how to keep this going (the open project) with reminders about how to get to various places to work on it.