Jump to content

User talk:64.201.173.145: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
July 2013: Blocked.
Vandalism
Line 81: Line 81:


<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] Anonymous users from this IP address have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''3 years''' for persistent vandalism, and ignoring four years of repeated warnings and seven past blocks, the most recent violation being [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=RedLetterMedia&diff=prev&oldid=565026858 this edit] to [[RedLetterMedia]]. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may [[Special:Userlogin|log in]] and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. &nbsp;[[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 12:44, 20 July 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-ablock -->
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] Anonymous users from this IP address have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''3 years''' for persistent vandalism, and ignoring four years of repeated warnings and seven past blocks, the most recent violation being [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=RedLetterMedia&diff=prev&oldid=565026858 this edit] to [[RedLetterMedia]]. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may [[Special:Userlogin|log in]] and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. &nbsp;[[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 12:44, 20 July 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-ablock -->

== Vandalism ==

I can see how vandalizing Wikipedia might be initially fun, even though most of these unconstructive edits are reverted within a few minutes. But eventually, it helps to grow up. I won't be affected by the Wikipedia edit block here at Sykes, since I have an account, but for those who don't want to register with Wikipedia, but still want to make USEFUL contributions to the site, I apologize on behalf of our juvenile co-worker who got our IP blocked. And in particular, to my colleague who uses the Reference Desk on a semi-regular basis, I'm sorry that we both have to work with a childish person who just had to have a little laugh at your expense. [[Special:Contributions/64.201.173.145|64.201.173.145]] ([[User talk:64.201.173.145#top|talk]]) 20:20, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:20, 20 July 2013

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Virginia M. Rometty has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Martin451 (talk) 21:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Michael Cohrs. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Martin451 (talk) 21:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Michael Cohrs. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 21:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Michael Cohrs. Alansohn (talk) 22:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 3 days from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoygabsadds 22:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Steve Archibald has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 21:44, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Vick. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MS (Talk|Contributions) 21:47, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Michael Vick. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Logan | Talk 21:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Michael Vick, you will be blocked from editing. Falcon8765 (talk) 21:57, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at E-Trade, you will be blocked from editing.  bsmithme  22:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to E-Trade. Jeffrey Mall | Talk2Me | BNosey - 22:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoygabsadds 22:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Harry Murray has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Vicenarian (Said · Done) 00:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Harry Murray. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Vicenarian (Said · Done) 00:28, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Harry Murray. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Vicenarian (Said · Done) 00:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to E-Trade, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: E-Trade was changed by 64.201.173.145 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-08-19T00:44:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 3 months from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 00:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page John Thain has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Thatguyflint Talk to me! 17:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page John Thain. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Thatguyflint Talk to me! 17:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to John Thain. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Thatguyflint Talk to me! 17:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to John Thain. Thatguyflint Talk to me! 17:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. J.delanoygabsadds 17:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Blocked for 1 year.

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Edward Lampert, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

The recent edit you made to Edward Lampert constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Piast93 (talk) 17:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Edward Lampert. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Piast93 (talk) 17:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Edward Lampert. Piast93 (talk) 17:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 18:01, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Davewild (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Glaisher. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to RedLetterMedia because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Glaisher [talk] 08:13, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Samuel Bayer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 10:14, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 years for persistent vandalism, and ignoring four years of repeated warnings and seven past blocks, the most recent violation being this edit to RedLetterMedia. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Nightscream (talk) 12:44, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I can see how vandalizing Wikipedia might be initially fun, even though most of these unconstructive edits are reverted within a few minutes. But eventually, it helps to grow up. I won't be affected by the Wikipedia edit block here at Sykes, since I have an account, but for those who don't want to register with Wikipedia, but still want to make USEFUL contributions to the site, I apologize on behalf of our juvenile co-worker who got our IP blocked. And in particular, to my colleague who uses the Reference Desk on a semi-regular basis, I'm sorry that we both have to work with a childish person who just had to have a little laugh at your expense. 64.201.173.145 (talk) 20:20, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]