Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Talia Castellano: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
another sockpuppet stamping his/her feet |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Candygirl386|Candygirl386]] ([[User talk:Candygirl386|talk]]) 07:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC) |
[[User:Candygirl386|Candygirl386]] ([[User talk:Candygirl386|talk]]) 07:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
:{{SPA|Candygirl386}} [[User:WWGB|WWGB]] ([[User talk:WWGB|talk]]) 07:32, 17 July 2013 (UTC) |
:{{SPA|Candygirl386}} [[User:WWGB|WWGB]] ([[User talk:WWGB|talk]]) 07:32, 17 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
* The key is whether or not she was noteworthy enough to warrant her own encyclopedia page. Emotion must NOT be a deciding factor in whether or not the page stays. Deleting this page would not be a "travesty and indignity to her name" -- it would merely be an indication that a majority of editors found her life to be unencyclopedic. It does not mean that they are disrespecting her health struggles or minimizing her impact on the lives of others. [[Special:Contributions/64.201.173.145|64.201.173.145]] ([[User talk:64.201.173.145|talk]]) 21:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:49, 17 July 2013
Talia is NOT famous for her death, she is famous ("She is best known for her YouTube channel") and should be kept on Wikipedia for childhood cancer, something she battled, was a spokesperson for and a cause that should be at the forefront to find a cure. Case in point: someone asked me tonight what form of cancer she had - I referred them to her Wikipedia. To remove it, would be a travesty and indignity to her name, and all other childhood cancer patients!! Candygirl386 (talk) 07:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- This template must be substituted. WWGB (talk) 07:32, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- The key is whether or not she was noteworthy enough to warrant her own encyclopedia page. Emotion must NOT be a deciding factor in whether or not the page stays. Deleting this page would not be a "travesty and indignity to her name" -- it would merely be an indication that a majority of editors found her life to be unencyclopedic. It does not mean that they are disrespecting her health struggles or minimizing her impact on the lives of others. 64.201.173.145 (talk) 21:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)