Jump to content

Talk:Red-faced spider monkey: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:Red-faced Spider Monkey to Talk:Red-faced spider monkey: new consensus on primate caps
m clean up, replaced: PrimateTalk → WikiProject Primates using AWB
Line 1: Line 1:
{{PrimateTalk|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Primates|class=start|importance=mid}}
== Cut from Talk:Black spider monkey ==
== Cut from Talk:Black spider monkey ==



Revision as of 17:09, 14 February 2013

WikiProject iconPrimates Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cut from Talk:Black spider monkey

== Scientific name ==

What is the scientific name of this species? I suspect it's already covered under another name within the genus Ateles. Ucucha 21:47, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it is: merged and redirected to Red-faced Spider Monkey (I did'nt sign this edit yesterday). —innotata (TalkContribs) 17:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cut here in case this page were to be mistakenly listed at WP:NCM. —innotata (TalkContribs) 20:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IUCN Status

I'm going by the newest, not-yet released IUCN Status, 3.2, which I received from my cousin-in-law, and it states that the red-faced spider monkey (legally named by the IUCN black spider monkey) is not qualified for any of the stats, thus giving it the status "data deficient," and this morning I changed it. Yet, somebody changed it back. Let me guess, I should go by 3.1... Well, the problem is, we always go by the newest stats on Wikipedia, and 3.2 is the newest. So I'm rechanging it. Regards, Belugaboy535136 Leave him a message, why don't you? 18:08, 1 January 2010 (CST)

This section was removed by Belugaboy535136. —innotata (TalkContribs) 20:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]