Jump to content

Talk:Cambridge Five: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 57: Line 57:
Agreed, this article needs significant updating, citing and improving. I'll make a start.([[User:Lewvalton|Lewvalton]] ([[User talk:Lewvalton|talk]]) 21:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)).
Agreed, this article needs significant updating, citing and improving. I'll make a start.([[User:Lewvalton|Lewvalton]] ([[User talk:Lewvalton|talk]]) 21:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)).


==John Caircross admitted he was "the Fifth Man" in 1991 ==
==John Caircross Admitted He Was he was "Fifth Fifth Man" in 1991, Denied It In His (1987?) Memoirs, But Named as Atom Bomb Spy by KGB Documents. ==
This is supported by the following quote from The Seattle Times 10/9/1995 as retrieved 1/27/2013 http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19951009&slug=2145983 "Mr. Cairncross, who worked for the British government for 16 years, admitted in 1991 that he was the "fifth man" in a ring of Russian spies. Newspapers had speculated about a fifth man since four others were revealed to have been spying for Moscow." Cairncross died on October 8, 1995, according to that article. I would like to have updated the list of those accused or admitted to have been "the fifth man," but do not want to contradict the entry on this talk page about how there should be a list of them. However, that entry was made in 2004, it is now 2013, and still there are no lists of those who have been accused (or themselves claimed) to have been "the fifth man." Hopefully someone more involved with Wikipedia than I am can make the necessary additions, as I am not sufficiently familiar with the rules and so do not want to start some dispute. This is just my attempt to give something concrete to the statement above that "most of the facts are now known." Should not a direct confession/admission be sufficient for Cairncross to be listed as (at least one of) "The Firth Man" (men)? -- James McQueston <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.184.223.32|71.184.223.32]] ([[User talk:71.184.223.32|talk]]) 01:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
(from The Seattle Times 10/9/1995 as retrieved 1/27/2013: http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19951009&slug=2145983) "Mr. Cairncross, who worked for the British government for 16 years, admitted in 1991 that he was the "fifth man" in a ring of Russian spies. Newspapers had speculated about a fifth man since four others were revealed to have been spying for Moscow." Cairncross died on October 8, 1995, according to that article.

However, "Cairncross denied being the Fifth Man, describing himself grandly as `The Enigma Spy' in an autobiography published last year two years after his death." (http://www.independent.ie/world-news/spy-gave-secrets-of-atom-bomb-to-russians-456966.html, retrieved 1/27/2013) Moreover, the leading line of the article is "JOHN Cairncross, the Fifth Man in the Cambridge spy ring, gave the Russians the atomic bomb, according to KGB documents."

I would like to have updated the list of "the Five" to name Cairncros as "the Fifth" but do not want to contradict the 2004 entry on this talk page about how there are a number of spies that fit this description. Hopefully, someone more familiar with Wikipedia editing can take the references I give here and do the right thing with them, or I will return to do it after I learn them. -- James McQueston

Revision as of 02:18, 28 January 2013

WikiProject iconPolitics of the United Kingdom C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSocialism C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEspionage Unassessed
WikiProject iconCambridge Five is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited Kingdom Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSoviet Union Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCold War Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUniversity of Cambridge Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Several anonyms have been busily adding their pet theories about the identity of "the Fifth Man". Please don't do that! As the article was already trying to explain, the preponderance of current evidence is that the ring contained far more than five members, and Golitsin's "Ring of Five" phrase was a red herring. Furthermore no-one has actually been convicted of it. It would be more appropriate to add a list of suspected members, each with a reason for inclusion, and perhaps noting (where appropriate) any specific public accusations, such as being the subject of a book. Securiger 00:53, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Regarding (in "Known Members" beginning): "Investigation of Philby found several suspicious matters but nothing for which he could be prosecuted, and he was forced to resign." Resign when, and from what post (both nominal and actual, since he was intel)? According to Kim_Philby#Chronology, he was asked to resign in '51 but it was not until 1955 that "the Foreign Service dismissed him because of his association with Burgess." This must have been an interesting four years, if it's really true he retained MI6 employment even though he knew he was under scrutiny. What's the story here? One or two sentences would solve this article's omission and probably add some interesting spice. Marquess 04:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gorsky

Perhaps some mention of Anatoly Gorsky, London Rezident 1940-1944 who managed the group should be made should be made; also it's time to do a Gorsky biopage. nobs 18:50, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Look into Dr. Arnold Deutsch as the principal recruiter. Another member - John Cairncross as the original fifth man.

Gay?

Wasn't the ring homosexual? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.206.165.32 (talk) 04:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Blunt and Burgess were homosexuals. (Burgess, in fact, was rumoured to have a variety of unorthodox peccadilloes.) The minor agent John Vassall (who was not part of "the Ring" per se) was also homosexual. However, there is little or no evidence any of the others were. Maclean may have been bisexual but the evidence is sparse and he was married (his wife joined him in Russia after he defected), while Philby married four times and also had several heterosexual affairs (including with Maclean's wife.) Michael Straight married twice, Rothschild married twice and produced seven children. Hollis was married and had at least one child, and was rumoured to have had a heterosexual affair in Shanghai. I have never heard anything one way or the other about Cairncross' sexuality. -- Securiger 13:42, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiP "fairy" has not messed-up this article, yet, with the usual line "...homosexuality was illegal in the UK in those days ...". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.72.216 (talk) 07:34, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What was the impact?

The article seems to talk exclusively about who they were, and not what they did. What was the impact? Article should state: Did they inform the Soviets about British nuclear capability throughout the late 1950s; or did they keep the Soviets informed about changes to the Tube schedules? Tempshill (talk) 04:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The main actual impact, I believe, was the USSR getting to know about the Trinity project. The British input here related to critical masses of U and Pu, although its unknown if any of the Five had access to these types of details. Such knowledge would have allowed the USSR to bypass all of the lengthy and expensive experiments to determine the critical values. The USSR Joe-1 test was in August 1949, over 4yrs after Stalin was informed of the Trinity tests, by Truman. It seems unlikely that any technical details were given to the USSR.

Potential unknown impacts related to details of the D-Day invasion, and afterwards. Stalin had strong motivations for D-Day to fail; in which case, he would have owned Europe by himself. D-Day details could also have leaked back to Germany. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.72.216 (talk) 07:49, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mitrokhin reference

The KGB defector Vasily Mitrokhin has in his notes much more information about this subject, including how they were recruited and by whom - Dr. Arnold Deutsch. The notes were used as source for "The Mitrokhin Archive - The KGB in Europe and the West" by Cristopher Andrew and Vasily Mitrokhin. Emilpop (talk) 11:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Allies

These articles need to make it clear that the Soviet Union was Britain's ally during WW2. These guys were not passing information to an enemy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.113.57.165 (talk) 18:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Nazis in the body

I have reverted an edit with this summary because the editor seems to have misunderstood the line "may have passed Soviet disinformation to the Nazis" to imply that there were Nazis in the body (presumably that of the Cambridge Five, although that is not clear). The suggestion that they passed such information could do with sourcing, though. Britmax (talk) 09:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The usual suspects

Wasn't Dick Ellis also accused? (Or am I confusing it with Hollis?) TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 19:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ellis was interrogated by Peter Wright well after the war for his activities round about the outbreak of war; while Ellis disclosed some information, Wright was unable to break him, according to his account in Spycatcher. Hollis was believed by Wright to have been a fit as the Fifth Man, but was interviewed after his retirement and this proved inconclusive. Hushpuckena (talk) 06:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thx. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 08:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

VENONA diagram

Does it merit mention the Sovs had penetrated VENONA (Weisband?)? And knew the U.S. & Britain was looking for spies from the very start? TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 03:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Out of date

The article is completely out of date I'm afraid. Most of the facts are known now. The sources are obselete also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KestevenBullet (talkcontribs) 09:58, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, this article needs significant updating, citing and improving. I'll make a start.(Lewvalton (talk) 21:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

John Caircross Admitted He Was he was "Fifth Fifth Man" in 1991, Denied It In His (1987?) Memoirs, But Named as Atom Bomb Spy by KGB Documents.

(from The Seattle Times 10/9/1995 as retrieved 1/27/2013: http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19951009&slug=2145983) "Mr. Cairncross, who worked for the British government for 16 years, admitted in 1991 that he was the "fifth man" in a ring of Russian spies. Newspapers had speculated about a fifth man since four others were revealed to have been spying for Moscow." Cairncross died on October 8, 1995, according to that article.

However, "Cairncross denied being the Fifth Man, describing himself grandly as `The Enigma Spy' in an autobiography published last year two years after his death." (http://www.independent.ie/world-news/spy-gave-secrets-of-atom-bomb-to-russians-456966.html, retrieved 1/27/2013) Moreover, the leading line of the article is "JOHN Cairncross, the Fifth Man in the Cambridge spy ring, gave the Russians the atomic bomb, according to KGB documents."

I would like to have updated the list of "the Five" to name Cairncros as "the Fifth" but do not want to contradict the 2004 entry on this talk page about how there are a number of spies that fit this description. Hopefully, someone more familiar with Wikipedia editing can take the references I give here and do the right thing with them, or I will return to do it after I learn them. -- James McQueston