Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Richardson: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m that's not how you post in AFD |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|Lily Richardson}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Richardson|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 16#{{anchorencode:Lily Richardson}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lily_Richardson Stats]</span>) |
:{{la|Lily Richardson}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Richardson|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 16#{{anchorencode:Lily Richardson}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lily_Richardson Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources|Lily Richardson}}) |
:({{Find sources|Lily Richardson}}) |
||
Not a notable person, only claim being a witness to a murder. Not only is there very little talk about the murder itself, the sources I found had only one instance that talked about Richardson. Delete. |
Not a notable person, only claim being a witness to a murder. Not only is there very little talk about the murder itself, the sources I found had only one instance that talked about Richardson. Delete. [[User:Buggie111|Buggie111]] ([[User talk:Buggie111|talk]]) 02:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | *'''delete'''. This person would need multiple mentions in reliable sources to meet notability criteria. If there's an article about the murder case, she might be mentioned in it, but that wouldn't be a reason for there to be an article on her the person. Generally the practice for cases where a person is known for involvement in one event, rather than being famous for multiple things, the article would be about the event, not the person, e.g. [[Kathryn Johnston shooting]]. [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">∇.</font>]]</small> 04:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
There are at least 4 Articles from seperate newspapers that cite Richardson as being key to the crowns case. |
*'''Keep'''. There are at least 4 Articles from seperate newspapers that cite Richardson as being key to the crowns case. |
||
She also appeared as a character of note in the story of her fathers fight with Microsoft in the Australian Story television show.. |
She also appeared as a character of note in the story of her fathers fight with Microsoft in the Australian Story television show.. |
||
She has been seen on television by over two million Australians due to the Australian story and is recognized in the street. |
She has been seen on television by over two million Australians due to the Australian story and is recognized in the street. |
||
Please do not play down the role of a key witness in a murder trial.. it is not something to be taken lightly. |
Please do not play down the role of a key witness in a murder trial.. it is not something to be taken lightly. {{unsigned|124.149.166.252}} |
||
[[User:Buggie111|Buggie111]] ([[User talk:Buggie111|talk]]) 02:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | *'''delete'''. This person would need multiple mentions in reliable sources to meet notability criteria. If there's an article about the murder case, she might be mentioned in it, but that wouldn't be a reason for there to be an article on her the person. Generally the practice for cases where a person is known for involvement in one event, rather than being famous for multiple things, the article would be about the event, not the person, e.g. [[Kathryn Johnston shooting]]. [[user:delldot|<font color="#990066">delldot</font>]] <small>[[user talk:delldot|<font color="DarkRed">∇.</font>]]</small> 04:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:32, 16 December 2012
- Lily Richardson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable person, only claim being a witness to a murder. Not only is there very little talk about the murder itself, the sources I found had only one instance that talked about Richardson. Delete. Buggie111 (talk) 02:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- delete. This person would need multiple mentions in reliable sources to meet notability criteria. If there's an article about the murder case, she might be mentioned in it, but that wouldn't be a reason for there to be an article on her the person. Generally the practice for cases where a person is known for involvement in one event, rather than being famous for multiple things, the article would be about the event, not the person, e.g. Kathryn Johnston shooting. delldot ∇. 04:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. There are at least 4 Articles from seperate newspapers that cite Richardson as being key to the crowns case.
She also appeared as a character of note in the story of her fathers fight with Microsoft in the Australian Story television show.. She has been seen on television by over two million Australians due to the Australian story and is recognized in the street. Please do not play down the role of a key witness in a murder trial.. it is not something to be taken lightly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.166.252 (talk • contribs)