Jump to content

Talk:Battle at Kruger: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Infobox: Reply
Line 32: Line 32:
:: It's still there, and it's almost 2013. Best infobox evar.
:: It's still there, and it's almost 2013. Best infobox evar.
:::Actually, that's a new one that was added very recently. I think we should keep it there. '''[[User:Bzweebl|<font color="#D60047">B</font><font color="#F0A000">zw</font><font color="#00A300">ee</font><font color="#0A47FF">bl</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Bzweebl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bzweebl|contribs]]) 02:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
:::Actually, that's a new one that was added very recently. I think we should keep it there. '''[[User:Bzweebl|<font color="#D60047">B</font><font color="#F0A000">zw</font><font color="#00A300">ee</font><font color="#0A47FF">bl</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Bzweebl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bzweebl|contribs]]) 02:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
The infobox is totally extraneous....I hate to crash the party guys but I would like to see this omitted for obvious reasons--[[User:Trilobite12|Trilobite12]] ([[User talk:Trilobite12|talk]]) 23:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:24, 9 December 2012

WikiProject iconSouth Africa: Protected areas C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the African protected areas task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconInternet culture C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Translation

What does a "massively reorganized buffalo" mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 06:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion?

Any additional sourced material is most welcome. TreeKittens 01:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This story featured on the BBC on Thursday 9th August: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6938516.stm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.1.145.225 (talk) 13:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for finding that source. I've cited it for the viewing figure of 9.5M. TreeKittens 18:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fate of the calf?

I would like to see some discussion from experts as well as links on what sort of injuries the calf might have sustained during the attack and whether or not there is any information available on the subsequent health of the calf after the attack. --134.48.241.136 (talk) 21:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it it survived the blood loss, I would say it is unlikely to survive the infections that would likely result from its injuries.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 04:08, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Haha, is that really necessary? I found it funny to see the commanders column. And "humiliated"?? Is that really necessary? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fixmanius (talkcontribs) 17:11, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha, yeah. "several humilated lions" and "one humiliated crocodile". "beligerents" and "commanders" is alos pretty funny. Someone is going to take it down but I'm leaving it. Funny as. Gregcaletta (talk) 10:54, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's still there, and it's almost 2013. Best infobox evar.
Actually, that's a new one that was added very recently. I think we should keep it there. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 02:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox is totally extraneous....I hate to crash the party guys but I would like to see this omitted for obvious reasons--Trilobite12 (talk) 23:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]