Building society: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
*[http://www.co-opstudies.org/Journal/May_98/Andy_love_May_98.htm Notes on legislation] |
*[http://www.co-opstudies.org/Journal/May_98/Andy_love_May_98.htm Notes on legislation]<br><br> |
||
[[Category:Financial services companies]] |
[[Category:Financial services companies]] |
Revision as of 20:38, 6 May 2006
A building society is a financial institution, owned by its members, that offers banking and other financial services, especially mortgage lending.
The term building society first arose in 19th century Britain from working men's co-operative savings groups: by pooling savings, members could buy or build their own homes.
In the UK today building societies actively compete with banks for most "banking services" especially mortgage lending and deposit accounts. There are currently (2006) 63 building societies in the UK with total assets exceeding £260 billion[1].
Origins
The original Building Society was formed in Birmingham in 1774. Most of the original societies were fully terminating, where they would be dissolved when all members had a house: the last of them was wound up in 1980. In the 1830s and 1840s a new development took place with the Permanent Building Society, where the society continued on a rolling basis, continually taking in new members as earlier ones completed purchases. The main legislative framework for the Building Society was the Building Society Act of 1874, with subsequent amending legislation in 1894, 1939 (see Coney Hall), and 1960.
In their heyday, there were hundreds of building societies: just about every town in the country had a building society named after that town. Over succeeding decades the number of societies has decreased, as various societies merged to form larger ones, often renaming in the process: most of the existing larger building societies are the end result of the mergers of many smaller societies.
1980s
In the 1980s, British banking laws were changed to allow building societies to offer banking services equivalent to normal banks. Building societies, in the classic form, were mutual organisations, jointly owned by those saving and borrowing. From the 1980s onwards, a number of societies, under pressure from members, `demutualised' to become commercial enterprises with shares of stock like any other company: members of the society would get a cash `windfall' - usually several hundred pounds, sometimes more - as their share of the assets of the society. This happened to a number of the larger societies, several of which were bought out by banks after their demutualisation.
A movement arose whereby investors would open a savings account with a mutual building society, thereby getting voting rights in the society, and pressurise for a vote on demutualisation, with the intent of getting a windfall payment as a result. A number of societies' members and managers were very unhappy about such investors, who were termed carpetbaggers, maintaining that as mutual societies, they could supply better and cheaper home loans than the banks and demutualised societies, as they only had to make a profit to cover their operational costs, and had no need to generate an additional profit to return to shareholders.
In the end, after a number of large demutualisations, and pressure from carpetbaggers moving from one building society to another to cream off the windfalls, most of the remaining societies modified their rules of membership in the late 1990s. The method usually adopted were membership rules to ensure that anyone newly joining a society would, for the first few years, be unable to get any profit out of a demutualisation. With the chance of a quick profit removed, the demutualisations have slowed considerably, as of December 2001.
Remaining building societies
The 10 largest of the remaining building societies are listed below.
(Total Group assets in sterling, as of June 2005.)
- Nationwide £111,592m
- Britannia £23,298m
- Portman £15,505m
- Yorkshire £15,034m
- Coventry £10,500m
- Chelsea £8,868m
- Skipton £8,137m
- Leeds £6,129m (name changed from Leeds & Holbeck mid-2005)
- West Bromwich £5,044m
- Derbyshire £4,407m
Source: Building Societies Association
Australia
In Australia, building societies evolved along British lines. Because of strict regulations on banks, building societies flourished until the deregulation of the Australian financial industry in the 1980s. Eventually many of the smaller building societies disappeared, while some of the largest (such as St. George) officially attained the status of banks.
USA
In the United States, the savings and loan associations have a similar organization and purpose.