Talk:Jatha: Difference between revisions
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Per the above uncontested proposal. — [[User:Aeusoes1|Ƶ§œš¹]] <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">[[User talk:aeusoes1|<small><sub>[ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ]</sub></small>]]</span> 00:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC) |
Per the above uncontested proposal. — [[User:Aeusoes1|Ƶ§œš¹]] <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">[[User talk:aeusoes1|<small><sub>[ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ]</sub></small>]]</span> 00:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' if you did the merge the other way, you wouldn't have this problem, as it is, we now have the problem of contribution history existing from the merge at the target -- [[Special:Contributions/76.65.128.252|76.65.128.252]] ([[User talk:76.65.128.252|talk]]) 02:14, 1 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==File:TalwinderSinghBabbar by P.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion== |
==File:TalwinderSinghBabbar by P.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion== |
Revision as of 02:14, 1 September 2012
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
South Asia Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
India Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Merge with Jatha
I think this should be merged with Jatha because 1) it is the correct term 2) "gangs" has a negative and criminal connotation that jatha doesn't 3) I believe Jatha is used in more wikipedia articles
However, although we should keep a lot of this information it's important to eliminate some of the history which is already covered in say misl
--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 03:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Since the merge is uncontested, I have gone ahead and done it. It seems like I've done it backwards, but this is the stronger article anyway so we can just rename it. — Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 00:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Requested move
The request to rename this article to Jatha has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
Per the above uncontested proposal. — Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 00:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Comment if you did the merge the other way, you wouldn't have this problem, as it is, we now have the problem of contribution history existing from the merge at the target -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 02:14, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
File:TalwinderSinghBabbar by P.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:TalwinderSinghBabbar by P.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:17, 23 September 2011 (UTC) |
File:Damdami taksal singhs.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Damdami taksal singhs.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:46, 24 September 2011 (UTC) |
File:Armed for freedom.jpg Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Armed for freedom.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 24 September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:47, 24 September 2011 (UTC) |