Opposition proceeding: Difference between revisions
m +lk |
fix toyp, and delink third parties (redirects to party disambig which has no mention of general 3P term) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An '''opposition proceeding''' is an administrative process available under the [[patent]] and [[trademark]] law of most |
An '''opposition proceeding''' is an administrative process available under the [[patent]] and [[trademark]] law of most jurisdictions which allows third parties to dispute the validity of a granted patent or trademark. |
||
==Patents== |
==Patents== |
Revision as of 04:28, 27 April 2006
An opposition proceeding is an administrative process available under the patent and trademark law of most jurisdictions which allows third parties to dispute the validity of a granted patent or trademark.
Patents
In Europe, third parties may dispute the validity of a granted European patent by filing a post-grant opposition under the European Patent Convention.
In Germany, third parties may dispute the validity of a pending German patent application under German patent law.
Under United States patent law, an opposition proceeding is called a reexamination.
In Japanese patent law, opposition procedure after an examiner's decision to grant a patent was abandoned in 2003; trial for invalidation serves as the alternative.
Trademarks
In the case of trademarks, third parties may use opposition proceedings to "oppose" the acceptance of a trademark application after it has been accepted and published for opposition purposes. If an opposition is defeated the trademark will proceed to registration. Some jurisdictions operate a "post-grant" opposition system, whereby opposition is not possible until after registration (eg. Japan).