Jump to content

Talk:Persecution of Muslims in Myanmar: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 155.69.203.1 - ""
Line 15: Line 15:
{{User burfreedemo}}
{{User burfreedemo}}
[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris]] 03:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
[[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris]] 03:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree. I am not sure how to make edits properly.

But the section on 2012 says that 2000+ have been massacred and has a reference. I read the reference and it says that the number of those killed (on all sides) is still less than 100 people...

So, the article says something wholly unsupported the actual reference used.

Revision as of 18:38, 3 July 2012

WikiProject iconHuman rights Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconReligion: Interfaith Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconIslam Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMyanmar Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject icon Persecution of Muslims in Myanmar is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

The article has a big self-pity value and does not quote sufficient sources. The article deliberately obfuscates the line between Burmese nationalism and religious tensions. A major failure in terms of neutrality and is more like a reposting of Moshe Yegar's book.

Please clean up to do actual justice to the people of Myanmar, regardless of race and religion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.203.1 (talk) 05:44, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{User burfreedemo}} produces

This user strongly advocates freedom and democracy in Myanmar.

Chris 03:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I am not sure how to make edits properly.

But the section on 2012 says that 2000+ have been massacred and has a reference. I read the reference and it says that the number of those killed (on all sides) is still less than 100 people...

So, the article says something wholly unsupported the actual reference used.