Talk:Economy of Peru: Difference between revisions
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Then bloody-well edit it to fix POV issues. It doesn't change anything if you sit here complaining [[User:Bmahoney|Pvt Mahoney]] 13:10, 15 April 2006 (UTC) |
Then bloody-well edit it to fix POV issues. It doesn't change anything if you sit here complaining [[User:Bmahoney|Pvt Mahoney]] 13:10, 15 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
It's peppered with non-POV adjectives like 'robust', 'sound', 'highly positive' - I've slapped a POV tag on it but it needs someone versed in the subject to clean it up. [[User:Kisch|Kisch]] ([[User talk:Kisch|talk]]) 00:21, 9 June 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== GDP 80,000?? == |
== GDP 80,000?? == |
||
Revision as of 00:21, 9 June 2012
| A summary of this article appears in Peru. |
 | Peru B‑class Top‑importance | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | Economics C‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
POV
The overview asserts that Peru's growth has been a result of their working with the IMF and World Bank, and that their financial problems are in spite of this. That's a pro-IMF POV (which is unsurprising, since the info comes from the CIA, which is very pro-IMF.) But many economists disagree. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 18:21, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
- Not only that, but reading the economic report lets you think that Peru is paradise, but reality is that according to last research 51,2 % of population is below poverty one of the highest in southamerica. tendency = still increasing. This information is strongly ommitted here. Bonduelle 16:47, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Then bloody-well edit it to fix POV issues. It doesn't change anything if you sit here complaining Pvt Mahoney 13:10, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
It's peppered with non-POV adjectives like 'robust', 'sound', 'highly positive' - I've slapped a POV tag on it but it needs someone versed in the subject to clean it up. Kisch (talk) 00:21, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
GDP 80,000??
Since when did the pervian GDP reach the heights of Scandinavian countries? 07:10, 06 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.109.174 (talk)
whatever, request a mediation on this
We need a new section on agro export. --Emperor Walter Humala · ( talk? · help! ) 21:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
The English Language
No matter how liable the information is, if it reads like a third-grader's essay, it's not going to be cited widely. Please look into the use of written English in this article. Pikalax 22:28, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- wikipedia shouldnt be used as citation I think, and according to policy we should avoy weasel words on the article, technical words for example to deep into economy, but the writing ought to be improved a little bit, though.
GDP per capita at 1980 levels?
The artice states "Peru’s GDP per capita peaked in 1981 and is only now returning to that level." I looked at the source for this statement and it says it is author's calculations. I have more reliable sources that show that GDP per capital (PPP) has increased since then http://www.indexmundi.com/peru/gdp_per_capita_(ppp).html Eiad77 (talk) 07:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Informality
Why doesn't this article give justice to informality? We cannot talk about the Peruvian economy without talking about informality. Also, the unemployment statistics are absurd when not discussed in the context of formal economic practices vs. informal economic practices.Jorgecatolica1 (talk) 23:02, 13 November 2010 (UTC)