Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William John Smart: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 9: Line 9:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' per nomination. This appears to be this guy's CV, and there are no real indications of notability. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 01:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nomination. This appears to be this guy's CV, and there are no real indications of notability. [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 01:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

* '''Delete''' The subject of the article lacks [[WP:GNG|significant coverage]] in [[WP:RS|reliable third party sources]] and fails the [[WP:BIO|notability guidelines for biographies]]. [[User:Alpha Quadrant|<span style="color:#000070; font-family:Times New Roman">Alpha_Quadrant</span>]] [[User talk:Alpha Quadrant|<span style="color:#00680B; font-family:Times New Roman">(talk)</span>]] 19:50, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:50, 17 March 2012

William John Smart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline candidate for deletion as an advert. He appears to be a successful architect, but no more notable than anyone else in the industry, which means that he isn't notable enough for a wikipedia article (IMO). No evidence of significant coverage of HIM, not just his work, in independent reliable sources. One IP edit resolves to his company, so almost certainly a WP:COI or WP:AUTOBIO. The-Pope (talk) 09:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]