Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William John Smart: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Australia |
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Architecture |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Borderline candidate for deletion as an advert. He appears to be a successful architect, but no more notable than anyone else in the industry, which means that he isn't notable enough for a wikipedia article (IMO). No evidence of significant coverage of HIM, not just his work, in independent reliable sources. One IP edit resolves to his company, so almost certainly a [[WP:COI]] or [[WP:AUTOBIO]]. [[User:The-Pope|The-Pope]] ([[User talk:The-Pope|talk]]) 09:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC) |
Borderline candidate for deletion as an advert. He appears to be a successful architect, but no more notable than anyone else in the industry, which means that he isn't notable enough for a wikipedia article (IMO). No evidence of significant coverage of HIM, not just his work, in independent reliable sources. One IP edit resolves to his company, so almost certainly a [[WP:COI]] or [[WP:AUTOBIO]]. [[User:The-Pope|The-Pope]] ([[User talk:The-Pope|talk]]) 09:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia|list of Australia-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Architecture|list of Architecture-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</small> |
|||
Revision as of 15:54, 10 March 2012
- William John Smart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Borderline candidate for deletion as an advert. He appears to be a successful architect, but no more notable than anyone else in the industry, which means that he isn't notable enough for a wikipedia article (IMO). No evidence of significant coverage of HIM, not just his work, in independent reliable sources. One IP edit resolves to his company, so almost certainly a WP:COI or WP:AUTOBIO. The-Pope (talk) 09:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)