Talk:2009 Pacific hurricane season: Difference between revisions
m →Robot: Reporting unavailable external link |
Yellow Evan (talk | contribs) I love the invest debate thank you Atomic7732 for starting it |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{bots|deny=SineBot}} |
{{bots|deny=SineBot}} |
||
{{hurricane|class=C|importance=Mid|seasons-task-force=yes}} |
{{hurricane|class=C|importance=Mid|seasons-task-force=yes|epac-task-force-yes}} |
||
{{WPTCarchive|archives=[[/Archive 1|1]]<!-- [[/Archive 2|2]], [[/Archive 3|3]], [[/Archive 4|4]]-->}} |
{{WPTCarchive|archives=[[/Archive 1|1]]<!-- [[/Archive 2|2]], [[/Archive 3|3]], [[/Archive 4|4]]-->}} |
||
{{WPTCspecialized|archives=[[/May|May]], [[/June|June]], [[/July|July]], [[/August|August]], [[/September|September]] , [[/October|October]]<!--, [[/November|November]], [[/December|December]] --> \\ [[/ACE calcs|ACE calcs]]}} |
{{WPTCspecialized|archives=[[/May|May]], [[/June|June]], [[/July|July]], [[/August|August]], [[/September|September]] , [[/October|October]]<!--, [[/November|November]], [[/December|December]] --> \\ [[/ACE calcs|ACE calcs]]}} |
||
{{maintained|{{user|Cyclonebiskit}}, {{user|DOSGuy}}, {{user|Keith Edkins}}, {{user|RattleMan}}, {{user|VOFFA}}}} |
{{maintained|{{user|Cyclonebiskit}}, {{user|DOSGuy}}, {{user|Keith Edkins}}, {{user|RattleMan}}, {{user|VOFFA}}, {[user|Yellow Evan}} |
||
{{TCBasinNav|year=2009|SHEM=2009–10}}<br/> |
{{TCBasinNav|year=2009|SHEM=2009–10}}<br/> |
||
Revision as of 15:36, 25 July 2011
Template:Hurricane Template:WPTCarchive
Specialized archives: May, June, July, August, September , October \\ ACE calcs |
Other basin talkpages (2009): Atlantic - W. Pacific - Central and East Pacific - N. Indian - S. Hemisphere |
November
- 96E.INVEST
- Best status from NRL: 30kts 1007 hPa
- 96E.INVEST first appeared 2009-11-04, 1215z @ 11.0ºN 91.5ºW.
NHC TWO
- 2009-11-04, 1200z // 1800z
- 2009-11-05, 0000z // 0600z // 1200z // 1800z
- 2009-11-06, 0000z // 0600z // 1200z // 1800z
- 2009-11-07, 0000z // 0600z // 1200z // 1800z
Tropical Cyclone Reports
01E.NONAME - released July 31, 2009
02E.Andres - released July 21, 2009
03E.Blanca - released November 23, 2009
04E.Carlos - released September 24, 2009
05E.Dolores - released January 25, 2010
06E.Lana - NHC TCR released February 19, 2010 // CPHC TCR released September 09, 2010
07E.Enrique - released September 21, 2009
08E.Felicia - NHC TCR released February 09, 2010 // CPHC TCR released September 09, 2010
09E.NONAME - released September 22, 2009
01C.Maka - CPHC TCR released September 09, 2010 // CPHC TCR released September 09, 2010
10E.Guillermo - NHC TCR released February 12, 2010 // CPHC TCR released September 09, 2010
11E.Hilda - NHC TCR February 12, 2010 // CPHC TCR released September 09, 2010
12E.Ignacio - released October 28, 2009
13E.Jimena - released January 29, 2010
02C.NONAME - CPHC TCR released September 09, 2010
14E.Kevin - released September 25, 2009
15E.Linda - released October 26, 2009
16E.Marty - released November 23, 2009
17E.Nora - released November 7, 2009
18E.Olaf - released November 16, 2009
19E.Patricia - released November 10, 2009
20E.Rick - Released December 11, 2009
03C.Neki - CPHC TCR released September 09, 2010
Enrique
Peak intensity upped to 65mph 994mbar due to a mid-level eye feature. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Linda
Released today, no changes (I think) --Anhamirak 23:04, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Jimena
Released nearly a week ago, not a cat 5. Ties Norbert (2008) for strongest landfall on Baja Peninsula. --Priyanka 22:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Felicia
NHC TCR released today, CPHC details included.Jason Rees (talk) 20:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Invest 97
Why did you delete it? It existed! I didn't ahve any time to cite, as it was 16E by the time I got back on! Mad Syntheticalconnections (talk) 00:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- We don't put invests on the main article, they're not tropical cyclones Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- 16E formed on 430 PDT September 16 and you edited it at about 554 PDT September 15. Darren23 My Contributions 00:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- I guess Wikipedia isn't as good as it could be... Syntheticalconnections (talk) 06:31, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Not including unimportant wisps of clouds is precisely what makes Wikipedia as good as it can be. We don't include invests because they are not notable. That they could become notable is irrelevant. --Golbez (talk) 16:24, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- You can't put something in before it is actually confirmed. We don't put invests and that can be vandalism if you put thing ahead of time without solid official confirmation (which is the NHC or maybe even the NRL/RBT). Darren23 Edits|Mail 12:03, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- The only exception to the rule is in other basins when it designated as a Tropical Depression or Tropical Disturbance whilst its an invest.Jason Rees (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- You can't put something in before it is actually confirmed. We don't put invests and that can be vandalism if you put thing ahead of time without solid official confirmation (which is the NHC or maybe even the NRL/RBT). Darren23 Edits|Mail 12:03, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Whatever, all I'm doing on here is considered bad and all I am trying to do is make it better. I am so glad I have my own wikis... Darren, what if my information is from the NOAA, and they confirmed it? Syntheticalconnections (talk) 03:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Because the NHC, the RSMC of the basin does not include it. Also a invest is not a tropical cyclone. --Anhamirak 14:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- So? Doesn't mean people can't know about it! Syntheticalconnections (talk) 23:47, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- This is an article about 2009 East and central Pacific Tropical Cyclones, not whips of small clouds, etc. Darren23Edits|Mail 00:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- That's it. You win. I don't ******* care anymore. So whatever go mancy pansy on your "no invest" ways. What did they ever do to you people... Oh yeah... They grew into crazy storms that whacked into coasts killing many. I guess that doesn't ******* have any significance. Syntheticalconnections (talk) 00:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Then why do you post, tropical disturbances, and depressions? THey are totally unorganized! Syntheticalconnections (talk) 01:19, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- We only post tropical disturbances if they become a tropical cyclones. However, I will not have an objection to putting 91E, the 2004 wave, or the July 1999 storm in the season article. Also not all depressions are totally disorganized. . Leave Message, Yellow Evan home
- The only places we put disturbances on is in the Shem when they are consider a part of the season down there, Depressions are not invests and as YE correctly put it not all depressions are badly organised at that peak. Also i will have an objection to putting in about "91E, the 2004 wave, or the July 1999 storm" as they are not mnitored as tropical depressions or higher by the NHC or CPHC.Jason Rees (talk) 08:26, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- We only post tropical disturbances if they become a tropical cyclones. However, I will not have an objection to putting 91E, the 2004 wave, or the July 1999 storm in the season article. Also not all depressions are totally disorganized. . Leave Message, Yellow Evan home
- Then why do you post, tropical disturbances, and depressions? THey are totally unorganized! Syntheticalconnections (talk) 01:19, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- That's it. You win. I don't ******* care anymore. So whatever go mancy pansy on your "no invest" ways. What did they ever do to you people... Oh yeah... They grew into crazy storms that whacked into coasts killing many. I guess that doesn't ******* have any significance. Syntheticalconnections (talk) 00:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- This is an article about 2009 East and central Pacific Tropical Cyclones, not whips of small clouds, etc. Darren23Edits|Mail 00:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- So? Doesn't mean people can't know about it! Syntheticalconnections (talk) 23:47, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Because the NHC, the RSMC of the basin does not include it. Also a invest is not a tropical cyclone. --Anhamirak 14:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Whatever, all I'm doing on here is considered bad and all I am trying to do is make it better. I am so glad I have my own wikis... Darren, what if my information is from the NOAA, and they confirmed it? Syntheticalconnections (talk) 03:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nora image
[1], [2] HurricaneSpin Talk My contributions 19:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- No, those images are either blurred or show not all of nora, the current one is high res and should stay. --Anhamirak 19:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Merge these. HurricaneSpin Talk My contributions 20:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Eighteen-E impacts
Any impact to southern Mexico, Revillagigedo islands and Baja California? Since it was a large storm. HurricaneSpin Talk My contributions 15:03, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Probably the impact is minor only, however, I couldn't find impact either. Darren23Edits|Mail 16:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Olaf Track
Can somebody please find it???? I've been looking for it but coundn't find anything!! =( It's missing and the article doesn't look right!! 200.12.34.225 (talk) 16:53, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
- I will inform a person who makes these WPTC tracks to make one. This might take a while though.Darren23Edits|Mail 16:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
- Theres a backlog at the minute as the most important tracks get done first. Jason Rees (talk) 17:44, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Patricia is now missing too... Circeus (talk) 18:34, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- Please be patient with the tracks. I'm the only person able (and working on wiki) to make these tracks and I do have things to take care of outside of wiki. I'm not always free as I'm in school and have homework and studying to do, which is much more important than wiki. Cheers, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:02, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Hurricane Rick
Now that Rick's a Category 5, is there support for an article on the storm? --Dylan620 (contribs, logs, review) 22:59, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes there is - Me and Darren23 have been urging CB to get on with it, though it may be worth waiting a little longer since there is still a lot to happen.Jason Rees (talk) 23:03, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- It is not a Category 5, some guy added false information to the section. -IrfanFaiz 01:24, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- It is, please read the NHC update on Rick Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- It is not a Category 5, some guy added false information to the section. -IrfanFaiz 01:24, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes there is - Me and Darren23 have been urging CB to get on with it, though it may be worth waiting a little longer since there is still a lot to happen.Jason Rees (talk) 23:03, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Hurricane Neki
Is anyone gonna add a pic of Neki? It's a Cat 2 right now, and expected to reach Cat 3 in 24-36 hr. Hurricanekiller1994 (talk) 15:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Heading for Category 4 now in its future.. look at this storm strengthen for this time of year - グリフオーザー (talk)
2010 season article
When would be a good time to create articles for next year's season? This year's season end is only about a week away anyway. Hurricanekiller1994 (talk) 01:41, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Wait until the beginning of the year. No point in having a blank template lying around for more time than necessary. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- What, until June 1, 2010? That's a bit long to wait. Or maybe just the beginning of 2010? Say January 1 maybe? Hurricanekiller1994 (talk) 01:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- He means 1-1-10 though the WPAC and NIO articles will be created before the 1st.Jason Rees (talk) 01:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, so Jan 1. When would be a good time for WPAC? Sometime next month? Hurricanekiller1994 (talk) 01:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, the beginning of the year means January 1, 2010.. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:00, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- He means 1-1-10 though the WPAC and NIO articles will be created before the 1st.Jason Rees (talk) 01:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Probbably about Mid decemeber for the NIO and WPAC ones Jason Rees (talk) 01:59, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- I have a basic outline for the 2010 WPAC article here: User:Anhamirak/2010 --Priyanka 10:23, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- What, until June 1, 2010? That's a bit long to wait. Or maybe just the beginning of 2010? Say January 1 maybe? Hurricanekiller1994 (talk) 01:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tracks1949to2008_epa.txt
- In 1957 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 03:36:17, 404 Not Found
- In 1989 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:47:55, 404 Not Found
- In 1957 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-04 18:22:47, 404 Not Found
- In 1957 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-04 20:07:33, 404 Not Found
- In 1965 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-06 13:11:50, 404 Not Found
- In 1972 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-06 15:14:40, 404 Not Found
- In 1973 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-06 20:34:35, 404 Not Found
- In 1992 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-08 01:37:23, 404 Not Found
- In 2009 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-17 18:27:10, 404 Not Found