Talk:Jewel Records (Shreveport record label): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:51, 9 June 2010

Sue Records

The Sue Records Wikipedia article shows that the Sue Records in the article has nothing to do with Jewel/Paula/Ronn Records. There may be an unrelated Sue label, but no verifiable source has been found yet. Steelbeard1 (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You´re absolutely right, Sue Records has nothing to do with Jewel Records, but there still existed a subsidiary label called Sue on Jewel Records! --Popiloll (talk) 20:04, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A linkable verifiable citation is still required. Steelbeard1 (talk) 20:06, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Jewel Records 45 sleeve shown at [1] also shows the Paula and Ronn labels. Steelbeard1 (talk) 20:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The citation given stating that there was a sublabel called Sue is questionable because a review of the cited book gives a bad review of the book in question at [2]. The above linked Jewel Records sleeve gives no mention of a Sue label.Steelbeard1 (talk) 22:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but the review is the oppinion of one single individual. That isn't enough to reject the encyclopedia as a reliable source. --Popiloll (talk) 04:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 22:43, 8 June 2010 edit Steelbeard1 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 24,717 edits →Sue Records: another point ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:51, 9 June 2010 edit undo Popiloll (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,634 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	The citation given stating that there was a sublabel called Sue is questionable because a review of the cited book gives a bad review of the book in question at [http://books.google.com/books?id=-w-uGwm_LhcC&dq=%22encyclopedia+of+the+blues%22&cd=2]. The above linked Jewel Records sleeve gives no mention of a Sue label.[[User:Steelbeard1\|Steelbeard1]] ([[User talk:Steelbeard1\|talk]]) 22:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)		The citation given stating that there was a sublabel called Sue is questionable because a review of the cited book gives a bad review of the book in question at [http://books.google.com/books?id=-w-uGwm_LhcC&dq=%22encyclopedia+of+the+blues%22&cd=2]. The above linked Jewel Records sleeve gives no mention of a Sue label.[[User:Steelbeard1\|Steelbeard1]] ([[User talk:Steelbeard1\|talk]]) 22:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

			Yeah, but the review is the oppinion of one single individual. That isn't enough to reject the encyclopedia as a reliable source. --[[User:Popiloll\|Popiloll]] ([[User talk:Popiloll\|talk]]) 04:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)