User talk:Elockid

Hello and welcome to my talk page! Some general guidelines: Please add a Subject/headline when creating new threads Please indent your posts with ":" if replying to an existing topic (or "::" if replying to a reply). Please sign your posts using "~~~~" Please be respectful and be civil. Like everyone else I do make mistakes If you post a comment here, I will respond here unless you request me to comment on your talk page or another page. You might want to watch this page for a response. You can do this by clicking the watch tab on the top right of the page I'm busy in real life and may not respond right away to your message. Please be patient. Thank you.

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012		2013 2014 2015

Removal of external link (globalurduforum.org)

Dear Elockid,

The website globalurduforum.org is an initiative to provide researchers useful information about Urdu writers. It is the most comprehensive website of its nature as it offers around 7000 names of different authors and details about them. I added its link in in the following page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urdu. However you deleted the link. I don't understand why? Can you please explain what is wrong with adding this link? If it should be introduced in some other way, you can introduce it in that way or suggest me what to do. For the moment, I have undone your change.

With best regards, 110.37.6.123 (talk) 07:31, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Please see WP:ELNO under number 10. Elockid ^(Talk) 11:51, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Dear Elockid, The refereed instruction does not apply here as the website is not a social networking sites neither it is chat or discussion forum etc. Please see the site before making any decision. 110.37.6.123 (talk)

I did. But it doesn't look like a notable website (It's not even ranked on Alexa). So number 4. Elockid ^(Talk) 17:34, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Dear Elockid, its true that this site has very low traffic but this does not mean that it is useless website. As mentioned earlier, there is no other website containing even half of the names presented at this website (ignoring for the moment brief information also given on globalurduforum). I think only this fact suffices as rationale for placing its link. I think that it could be a very useful resource for the researchers. 110.37.6.123 (talk)

Tell you what, you can always try to see if anyone else wants to add the website. Just use the talk page and see if anyone else agrees. Elockid ^(Talk) 22:21, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Need you to take a look at this

Hello, I need you to look trough a SPI. Its very important that you read through everything. From the beginning to the end. [1]

Then, what I would like is a comment from you on the last part of the evidence, where I point out this edit. The fact that after exclusively using the Nefer Tweety account to back Arab Cowboy on several articles for 7-8 months, (considering everything I have pointed out in the evidence) the NT account then contacts ACs sock before it was revealed that AC controlled it and "asks" him to go to the article. How can this have been a coincidence? Can you take a look at the evidence? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 10:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

I'll take a look at it when I get more time. This is so I can do a full review of the case. Elockid ^(Talk) 11:09, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok, thank you, admin moonriddengirl said it looked quacky and that I should open a SPI [2], admin Shirik now said that the evidence is pretty compelling but since he is relatively new to SPI he wont act on it:[3]. I hope it wont take to long for you to look at it. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:05, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

I've been looking at it actually. At glance it looks like meatpuppetry. But there was another suggestion that it could be sock of another, Wolof39, I believe. I'll have to look into that case too. Elockid ^(Talk) 18:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Its not Wolof395, he is unrelated in behaviour and CU. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Please remove email access from User:UnitStock50

Another SGF email bomber. This sockpuppet wasn't mentioned in the SPI case. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ message • changes) 13:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done. Elockid ^(Talk) 13:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Blocked account

still at it on their talk page. Would you mind restricting talk page access for Livapol (talk · contribs)? That or deal with their request for unblock. ALI ^{nom nom} 18:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Addressed and watching the page. Elockid ^(Talk) 18:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Elockid. You have new messages at CIreland's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

your comment on my talk page

Yep, I'd say it's the same person. Wikistar2 was blocked as a sock of Stravin a few weeks ago, this person removed the confirmation of that with "revert unconstructive edit". List of leaders of the Liberal Party of Australia (New South Wales Division) was a pet article of User:Watchover (another Stravin sock) and the other articles they have edited are Labor federal politicians (the person behind all these is probably a member of the opposition Liberal Party). I also have 121.216.* and 121.218.* edits from Watchover from 2009 (eg 121.216.62.191) Orderinchaos 14:41, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

No worries - caught me at a good time, I was packing up and thought I'd check my Wiki watchlist before doing so. :) Orderinchaos 14:47, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Rupert Murdoch page problem.

There have been discussions about his nationality in the talk page and yet people change his nationality to Australian without discussing it in the talk page. Could you please take a look at this struggle? Thank you-- And Rew 16:36, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with him, sorry. So I can't be of much help. Elockid ^(Talk) 16:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Favor

Thanks for the blocks, but do you wanna block one more? User talk:Tommy2010sucks (lol) Tommy2010 17:24, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Your welcome. Tommy2010sucks blocked indef. Obviously a sock. Elockid ^(Talk) 17:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Obviously a fan. Tommy2010 17:42, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Yup, that too. Elockid ^(Talk) 17:45, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Please remove email access from User:Armedunion48

Here's another ScienceGolfFanatic sockpuppet. Same email bombing. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ message • changes) 21:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done. Elockid ^(Talk) 23:01, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Sock help

Do you recognize the sockmaster behind Who ever I am2 (talk · contribs) (context)?
PS: Congrats on your adminship! Sorry I missed the RFA; glad that it didn't make any difference.:) Abecedare (talk) 06:09, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

I have an inclination that it's Nangparbat. I've blocked based on the duck test. It's probably unnecessary, but I told YM about it. Also, thanks for the congrats! Elockid ^(Talk) 11:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Keys43

You missed Aussie's pick-up of Slimsticky on the SPI. I have to say Slimsticky's userpage is starting to look similar in style to Keys43's past socks. Bidgee (talk) 15:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing it up. Blocked and tagged. Elockid ^(Talk) 15:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Return of disruptive IP

Hi Elockid. You previously blocked User talk:64.222.111.5 for disruption and breach of 3RR. They would appear to be back as User talk:64.222.110.145 and User talk:NedTugent amongst others, inserting the same trivial edit at Spire of Dublin; see [4],[5], [6] and [7] again contrary to 3RR and against clear consensus. (For acccounts link see [8]). The page was recently semi-protected ,solely for this reason which appears to be the work of a single disruptive contributor. Could you perhaps take another look. Best. RashersTierney (talk) 16:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

I reprotected the page. I'm not sure if this sockpuppetry yet since the IP is evidently here to be disruptive. I'll monitor the page to see if it gets out of hand. Elockid ^(Talk) 21:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. RashersTierney (talk) 22:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

I have also clashed with this IP on Local food, where s/he has been edit-warring in order to insert a deliberately false statement, which s/he believes ought to be true. The editor has also been adding inane comments to biographies, eg Keir Hardie, Neville Chamberlain and Zac Goldsmith.RolandR (talk) 08:19, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

I might be missing something, but the IP hasn't been overly active on those pages with exception to local food. I have watchlisted the pages and am monitoring the situation. Elockid ^(Talk) 11:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

IP is adding inane remarks to these and other biographies, and their associated talk pages. For example: [9], [10], [11] RolandR (talk) 11:40, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

I see. These are unacceptable. The last inane comment added was about 2 days ago though, and you already warned them for that. It seems like they stopped the inane comments on article talk pages for now. Elockid ^(Talk) 11:51, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

User Backfire 1

Hello mister can you unblock me? Backfire 1 I'm not Era7!!

Thanks88.204.157.122 (talk) 07:38, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

This is not a convincing unblock request. Also, please make an unblock request with an acceptable reason on your talk page following the instructions on the template. Another administrator may review your block there. Elockid ^(Talk) 11:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

I fail to see how you reach the conclusion that the user known as Drork wrote the recent remarks on the talk page of State of Palestine. Is there a special feature in his writing that you immediately recognize? But even if you are right, what difference does it make? I understand you have some kind of dispute with him, but what does it have to do with the content of the article? The article clearly includes errors. Harlan Wilkerson clearly misinterpret sources. He is honest enough to bring links, so it is easy to see his misinterpretation of Prof. James Crawford. If you have time - read the sources yourself, if you don't, you might as well trust me on that. Furthermore, Harlan Wilkerson admitted to have political motivations regarding this article. This is enough to ask him not to edit this article anymore. All his contributions are in articles about the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts, and in all of them he introduces the same views with the same sources, which are controversial and/or misinterpreted by him. The fact that you have friends and foes on Wikipedia, shouldn't distract you from acting in the best interest of the encyclopedia itself. 79.177.45.157 (talk) 21:54, 12 May 2010 (UTC)