User talk:ESkog: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:28, 24 December 2009

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will respond on your talk page unless you request otherwise.
Start a new talk topic.

Index of Talk Page archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F May 19-December 22, 2010 - December 23, 2010 - November 10, 2011 - December 8, 2011 - October 8, 2012 - October 18, 2012 - May 27, 2013 - May 30, 2013 - March 26, 2014 - January 29, 2015 - March 15, 2017

Jinnah pictures

As these pictures pictures more then 50 years old so, according to Pakistan copyright law these are under public license or domain it does not matter what is the source of these pictures.

Barbaro family

I'd appreciate another set of eyes on this page. User:Jky52 has been repeatedly been deleting sourced, but negative info about the Barbaro family. [1] [2] [3] while incorrectly dismissing a nonfiction source, claiming it's novel. [4] I added 5 new additional English and Italian sources. Jky52 blanked them again. [5] Edward321 (talk) 22:58, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please?

Fine, let it be. Tuanese 16:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

question?

hi i am not sogood in english so i cant really understand wat should i do when i am uloading image here. Most of images is mo own work so what should i write in permision option? can you write it to me? --Politologia (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi

hi can you help me to upload a Image file for Theyab Awana ,and the Image create by our Site [6] i choose it's my own work and i do not know what copyright Licence Choose so help with that ??? (Sm3a (talk) 15:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)).[reply]

non - free

"They can't be used in tables like this." - Why not? Pdfpdf (talk) 16:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Bother. (Well, there's only a few of them.) Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 17:02, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's fixed it. How did you spot it/them? (I may have done it elsewhere.) Pdfpdf (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Deleting Our Images

I don't know what else to say here. I am the Vice President of MArketing for Winning Moves Games. We create board games and puzzles worldwide. You deleted the image I uploaded of our game - Go To The Head of the Class. This is our game...we marketed it, we took teh photo, we provided it to Amazon, B&N and every other online retailer. I personally uploaded it to the Wiki page. I understand the policies and I am very happy to know that there are moderators out there policing the Wiki pages but this is getting a bit annoying. My images keep getting deleted....for products that we created, invented, and/or marketed. IT seems that each time I explain this to someone...someone else comes along and deletes the image.

I've already sent in all the necessary forms and paperwork required to prove that these images belong to us...heck, you can see ALL our images on our website winning-moves.com

Thank you, joe —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joesequino (talk • contribs) 16:50, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zyalover

Zyalover's still uploading non-free images without descriptions. I'm a newbie in this field, so would you please take a look? Zyalover is ignoring all warnings and failiing to communicate. I think another, longer block is needed. Thanks, Airplaneman ^talk 13:22, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I see what you mean, man I really need to look into things before uploading them. Thanks for the notification.--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 15:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you can teach me how to properly upload files--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 15:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible for me to ask ESPN for the rights to use their images. Or is that highly unlikely to succeed?--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 14:32, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the fact that you said "experience", I'm assuming you have asked people before and more often than not, been denied. Oh well, I'll give it a shot.--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 17:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did talk to ESPN and they were not willing to relese images, However they told me to check out organazations that they aquired them from. So far not so good. Getty Images requires purchase and I'm not sure about the others.--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 17:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, you were right.--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 20:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I took your advice and looked at some images, Mike Grier on Flickr. Are there still too many rights on it or is it usable?--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 00:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You my friend are correct, I later relized that when I relized I can filter the search to only creative commons licensed images. I found one I liked of Henik Tallinder, but when I tried to upload it to wikipedia, it was reccomended to upload it to Commons. When I tried to do that, it got way to complicated. Does it have to be on Commons?--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 15:10, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roger that, so what category and what license should I put the file under?--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 17:29, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found a pretty good photo, but I'm not sure what category and license to put it under. Can you help?--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 16:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How's this?--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 17:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And this.--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 17:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JohnSkelto.jpg

I have uploaded this photo adhering to all copyright protections. This photo was taken at field level with the permission of the Fordham University Athletic Department. Please remove the flag for possible deletion Mal84 (talk) 20:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Heman60

You tagged some of Heman60's images and I have retagged all of his image as missing permission because he has failed to provide a working url to any image, even though he has now added a creative commons licence tag and all the images have a copyright watermark, so I have to assume they have been stolen from the website without permission of the copyright holder. You may want to watch him for a while as I am doing. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 03:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

karel urbánek image

As with all rules and laws is fair use should be used when interpreting the brain (forgiveness)

ask any admin, and he will potrvdí that this is entirely in order (Part of legisltive wikipedia to which you refer is a common and chicanery irregularity, which still poorly understood it)

ask any admin, my changes in article it corect, and you are mistaken --77.48.153.172 (talk) 15:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cant your read? stop saboting my project with your inability to understand what I say to you... your are no got, this is not a "im say, and your must lisen"

salect a admin, who we judge, until then part will remain in my version, under the name "conflict situations" --77.48.153.172 (talk) 15:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas Gracias!

		The Guidance Barnstar
		Thanks for teaching me how to upload images legally and properly! Your a life saver!--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{S†rawberry Fields (sign)} 17:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Index on Censorship

All the images are, I would argue, fair use, but they all seem to be disputed - even the Index logo, which surely has to be fair use - but it is hard to do more than make the claim.

The one that I know has been subject to dispute is the Beckett, but when republished the copyright to the manipulated image (ie not the original) was ascribed to Index on Censorship.

I can notify Index as to the use of the images so they can raise objections... would that help?

Plainsailing (talk) 19:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picture hans van baalen for Liberal International

Hi there, thanks for your comment. Could you tell me how to add to the file that the picture comes from my company's website and is for public use (press etc).? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clochard82 (talk • contribs) 15:24, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi, sorry I misread Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr. Can you delete the following too; File:Stuart Thurgood.jpg, File:Leroy Griffiths.jpg, File:Glenn Poole.jpg and File:Jamie Stuart.jpg. Thanks, 20:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Wings Across America (WAA-08)

Dear Sir, I humbly disagree with your decision and comments by your associates to delete my article. We feel that the submission for approval is entirely informative and well documented as an ongoing event. It is not meant as an "advertisement", there are no revenues gained by participation in this event. We have a website and did not intend to use the article for that purpose. Needless to say we are disappointed in the "recommendation to delete". Our intent simply is to enlighten and encourage radio controlled model aviation. Your reconsideration and commentaries would be most appreciated. Donald e. Jiskra Sr. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donald E. Jiskra Sr (talk • contribs) 17:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:Rebekah Coleberg.JPG

Thank you very much for your message in my talk page. I truly appreciate it. The proper fixes have been made. Image source and proper license and rationale. Take care. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MY contribution: SM U-25 001 Cruises.jpg - proposed by YOU for deletion

Sorry, user:Eskog: I saw that you still propose this file for deletion, even after I had added correctly a license. Dont we have other things to do at Wiki ? Why isnt there a "discussion" if users delete each others texts ? Please tell me exactly the reason, why you think that this file is worth deletion ? Another (hidden) rule I do not know ? Do you think this is very helpfull for newbies like me, to try to delete after mysterious, secret rules their contributions ? As I see from your talk page, you are a very self-determined specialist in deleting other peoples images. Very GREAT contribution to the Wiki community. Maybe you may consider to be more constructive here ? Leave me alone please. Its a shame, that I cannot rate people like YOU from -10 to +10, to valorize the "help" I received.--Hans Joachim Koerver 19:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hey...

that's the matter... i dunno how to arrange the picture's license.....

could you help me, please find my pictures then fix its source and author.......

Senayan.jpg was taken from flickr.com Bundaran HI.jpg was taken from flickr.com and the author is mine Jakartaatmoonlight.jpg was taken from flickr as well and the author is mine too

how to make the license, i dunno !! please help me —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikael07 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hey....

could you help me do that please..... i am blind of that ....

the problem is i dunno how to tag and give license.... i dunno how to write in the summary box when i use that...

by the way, if i uploaded the picture, how can i fix it and give the information needed —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikael07 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Erminameraz

Hi there. Would it be possible for you to remove all the templates that now cover this user's talk page and summarise them with one post (or, alternatively, would you mind if I did), as a whole string of templates on a new user's talk page seems very bitey to me, and I don't want to scare away what could be a valuable contributor? Thanks in advance. Ged UK 15:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Ged UK 16:03, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done If you find anymore, could you just add the filenames to the bottom of the list, rather than templating. Thanks again, and thanks for your work on image copyrights! Ged UK 16:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:PeterDunnAMZN.jpg

Hi, the copyright for the image PeterDunnAMZN.jpg is held by Peter Dunn (the author), not Amazon, though Amazon is licensed to use it. I'm happy to upload it and save it with a different name. EFSlattery (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify what you said about File:Jaikoz.png

That is, what you said here about a screenshot of a software product for editing MP3 tags.

Did you mean that album art is categorically excluded without a publisher's release, and therefore also this screenshot that included album art? What confuses me are pictures like this one: File:Fool_for_the_City.jpg. Are they different somehow, or is it that their rationale for fair use is simply wrong?
Are screenshots restricted, or only screenshots lifted from the publisher? I'm not sure what user:Blargh29 meant by his comment.

Forgive me if there are obvious answers to these questions, but I've never posted media, and I found no guidelines for album art or screenshots. Yappy2bhere (talk) 00:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your speedy reply. So, a screenshot of that software product in the article about that software product (but without album art) is an acceptable use of non-free content, but use of that same screenshot in another article is not? Yappy2bhere (talk) 04:02, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your help. May you have a very happy holiday, and a joyous New Year. Yappy2bhere (talk) 04:47, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YungSilver

YungSilver is a copyvio MACHINE and has been for ages. Warnings have been issued ad nauseum, as you can see. Please put an end to this. JBsupreme (talk) 08:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 17:28, 24 December 2009 edit Noman488 (talk \| contribs) 198 edits mNo edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:28, 24 December 2009 edit undo Noman488 (talk \| contribs) 198 edits mNo edit summary Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:


	== [[Jinnah pictures]] ==		== Jinnah pictures ==
	As these pictures pictures more then 50 years old so, according to Pakistan copyright law these are under public license or domain it does not matter what is the source of these pictures.		As these pictures pictures more then 50 years old so, according to Pakistan copyright law these are under public license or domain it does not matter what is the source of these pictures.