Jump to content

User talk:SimonD: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
==Huggle==
==Huggle==
Please be careful with the use of Huggle. As clearly stated in [[WP:HG]], it for dealing with [[WP:VAN]]. Reading the edit summary and checking the info provided should make it clear that the edit reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Florida_panther&diff=324461480&oldid=324460727 here] wasn't vandalism. • [[User_talk:Rabo3|<span style="color:darkblue">''Rabo³''</span>]] • 14:12, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Please be careful with the use of Huggle. As clearly stated in [[WP:HG]], it for dealing with [[WP:VAN]]. Reading the edit summary and checking the info provided should make it clear that the edit reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Florida_panther&diff=324461480&oldid=324460727 here] wasn't vandalism. • [[User_talk:Rabo3|<span style="color:darkblue">''Rabo³''</span>]] • 14:12, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that I had made the mistake, my bad [[User:SimonD|SimonD]] ([[User talk:SimonD#top|talk]]) 14:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:14, 7 November 2009

My count info can be found here SimonD (talkcontribsnon-automated contribswikicheckercounttotallogspage movesblock logemail)

facepalm:

It's not vandlism. It's what Slash said on his twitter to confirm Myles Kennedy's presence on his solo album Slash & Friends. 88.15.69.96 (talk) 13:55, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok fair enough.

Blanking of article by its author

In this edit you used Huggle to warn Asaraullo05 (talk · contribs) not to blank pages. However, in this case the page blanked was an article which Asaraullo05 had created, and was tagged as a copyvio. In this situation it is considered acceptable for a user to blank the article, provided there is no substantial contribution from any other editor, and this is taken as an acceptance that the article can be deleted, per WP:CSD G7. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:24, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't realised he was the author, if I had I would of recommeneded

deletion Mm. Hello. Re the last entry on http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:193.60.94.65&redirect=no -- it wasn't a test, I was fixing spelling errors on the page... ~KatieL Ok thanks

Deleting tags

Fair enough, but even after I had added some content, people were deleting it and replacing it with the speedy deletion nomination. Ajna01 (talk) 22:38, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They was following the rules, if someone thinks it's not worth the page they can recomend it for deletion, its not meant to be rude towards the author. SimonD (talk) 22:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle

Please be careful with the use of Huggle. As clearly stated in WP:HG, it for dealing with WP:VAN. Reading the edit summary and checking the info provided should make it clear that the edit reverted here wasn't vandalism. • Rabo³ • 14:12, 7 November 2009 (UTC) I noticed that I had made the mistake, my bad SimonD (talk) 14:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]