User talk:Closedmouth

Hello.

Hello Closedmouth, I have a concern. I noticed you deleted the Tyrannosaurus Rex (film) article. I realize this was because it was listed, but I was wondering if you had taken into account the fact that I had, just an hour or so ago, added new sources and new material, before you deleted it. I understand the policy of new films, and I am behind it, but I was wondering if it were possible to gain access to the deleted page so the material could possibly be merged into Rob Zombie's article, so it will not be lost? Thank you. --HELLØ ŦHERE 13:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Quickly, I'd also like to point out that there wasn't a discussion for the deletion of the article. At least, not to my personal recollection. It was listed, and then sources were added, as far as I am aware, no discussion took place. --HELLØ ŦHERE 13:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyrannosaurus Rex (film). Article says it's not gotten past the pre-production stage, not much point in recreating it until they start shooting. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I very much understand, I hadn't been aware of that. I only began watching the page a month or so ago, then noticed the prod posted a few days ago, and I decided to find and add sources. I very much understand that it should not be recreated, and I agree. But would it be possible to access the material to add to his article so it would not have to be searched for again? --HELLØ ŦHERE 13:48, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I was going to email it to you, but you don't seem to have an email address enabled. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

You Stink!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why did you delete my page? I worked hard on that and you ruined it. If only I knew how to delete yours. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weirdo 789 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Copyright Tagging

Hello, thank you for notifying me of the copyright tag. However, I do not know how one would go about tagging this article. The image is copyrighted to Five Finger Death Punch, would it be possible for you to put it in there yourself? Morbus Rising (talk) 15:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I went to bed just as you asked this. But it seems you've figured it out anyway. The problem is that the image is replaceable, which means it fails the first criterion of our non-free content policy. It will probably be deleted, sorry. --Closedmouth (talk) 06:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

• Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
• News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:02, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Explain to me the sandbox

if the sandbox is a place for people to do whatever they want then how come i was blocked —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.223.191 (talk) 04:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Your question is based on the false assertion that the sandbox is for people to do whatever they want. Nobody ever said this. It's for people to test out formatting and also just to see what editing a wiki is like. What you did was wholly inappropriate and not within the bounds of what is acceptable on the sandbox or anywhere. --Closedmouth (talk) 06:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

RiotSnow

Hello can you please tell me how my RiotSnow article violated wikipedias terms and should have been deleted? everything on that article was either 100% true or a rumor about RiotSnow and I clearly mentioned that they were rumors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by StevenSnow (talk • contribs) 07:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

You just answered your own question. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Hyakinthos.jpg‎

Hi, i saw you had deleted this file, as it was empty/corrupt. This was because it had no licence at commons, but as i had a copy of the image saved, i re-uploaded it here. I've added information on the source, but was wondering if there was more detail in the deleted version. Is it possible for you to check and/or copy any description info back onto the page? I consider it to be PD either way, but an author of the photo is always better than unknown, as it might affect how it can be used in other countries. Thanks either way.

Also, that Jimbo head is scary!YobMod 15:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

It's still at Commons, no point having it here too. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Not still in commons, i loaded it there after here. Commons cannot be trusted to maintain images imo, but it doesn't matter, i can upload it again if they delete it again. I take it there was no extra information in the deleted version? So it's all good.YobMod 18:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm so used to the "View or restore xx deleted edits?" on en already that I forgot to check the commons deletion log. And no, when I deleted it the first time, it was empty (that's why I deleted it [1]). --Closedmouth (talk) 16:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Angel Heartz

Can I please have a copy of the stated page? My sister got on this account and I want to see what she has done. Thanks Eurovision 2009 and 2010^{Sasha Son}_{Sakis Rouvas} 16:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't know which page you're talking about. A link would be nice. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

To be honest, I would think it would be obvious, thats why it says Angel Heartz at the top. Angel Heartz is the page. Eurovision 2009 and 2010^{Sasha Son}_{Sakis Rouvas} 19:15, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

List of atheists (science and technology)

"Please stop edit warring on List of atheists (science and technology). Continued reversion will result in the page being protected from editing until the dispute can be resolved. --Closedmouth (talk) 10:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)"

Right, will do. Thanks. 8bit (talk) 10:56, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Hamish McDonald / Hamish MacDonald

Hello Closedmouth, per the request on your userpage I'm commenting to let you know I recently undid your merge of these two (confusingly similarly named) journalists, as they're different people. If you feel like contributing further the fledgeling Hamish McDonald page could use work as I've just hastily compiled a few of the facts about him which I'd found when double checking the mistaken merge with Hamish MacDonald. Thanks! Splateagle (talk) 14:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

That's fine, I didn't merge the articles, somebody tried to move one of them via cut and paste, and I just fixed that. At the time they were both the exact same article. --Closedmouth (talk) 16:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

thanks

thanks for taking care of my pages for me

You're welcome. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:53, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Dramaonly

Hi, Closedmouth! You are invited to participate in the Great Wikipedia Dramaonly, an effort to end arguments and discussions, and fight vandalism! It is intended to stop discussions from interfering everyone's work in the article namespace. Please sign up here! Kayau Wuthering Heights VANITY FAIR paradise lost 10:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

I wouldn't have anything to do. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:40, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Herald Sun

what relevance does the opinion of john pilger on andrew bolt have to do with the herald sun page? surely it would be more appropriate on andrew bolts page? --121.220.78.249 (talk) 09:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

I couldn't find anything constructive about this edit. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Paint It Black

Hi Closdemouth, thanks for trying to fix the mess that User:Das Ansehnlisch caused. However, the page is currently at Paint It Black when the correct title is Paint It, Black. Please can you arrange this move, as it won't let me. --JD554 (talk) 16:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)