User talk:NeroAxis: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
LeaveSleaves (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
I will continue to state the truth on that page, as all Wikipedians, without regard for circumstance or consensus, should always do. The facts are on my side, any attempt to block me from editing, and the subsequent legal process which will follow, will reflect that. |
I will continue to state the truth on that page, as all Wikipedians, without regard for circumstance or consensus, should always do. The facts are on my side, any attempt to block me from editing, and the subsequent legal process which will follow, will reflect that. |
||
:Stop the edit warring immediately. You are close to violating the [[WP:3RR|three revert rule]], in which case you will be blocked for disruptive behaviour. If you have issues with the content of the article, discuss it on the article's talk page. <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/LeaveSleaves|<span style="color:#00009C">Leave</span>]]''</sup>'''[[User:LeaveSleaves|<span style="color:#00009C">Sleaves</span>]]''' 14:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:21, 26 June 2009
|
- You have deleted a significant amount of information from the Brighton article. Please remember to include an edit summary when making such actions otherwise other editors do not know the reason why you have done this. I have reinserted the information for now. Thanks. Paste Let’s have a chat. 15:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Andy Murray. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- It is not personal commentary, it is an objective analysis of the facts and a consequent adaptation of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NeroAxis (talk • contribs) 13:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- This issue has been discussed to death on the talk page, and consensus reached as to how to proceed. If you disagree then the onus is on you to attempt to change people's minds on the talk page, not to repeatedly re-edit the article (especially not while changing the admonishment in the accompanying comment to say exactly the opposite of what it previously did). Doing so will likely lead to your being blocked from editing entirely. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I will continue to state the truth on that page, as all Wikipedians, without regard for circumstance or consensus, should always do. The facts are on my side, any attempt to block me from editing, and the subsequent legal process which will follow, will reflect that.
- Stop the edit warring immediately. You are close to violating the three revert rule, in which case you will be blocked for disruptive behaviour. If you have issues with the content of the article, discuss it on the article's talk page. LeaveSleaves 14:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)