User:Robert M Johnson: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<br />Although I would very much enjoy being correct on every matter, I would be a liar by omission to claim that I am not free of my share of ignorance. |
<br />Although I would very much enjoy being correct on every matter, I would be a liar by omission to claim that I am not free of my share of ignorance. |
||
<br />I am the proud to have an insatiable thirst for knowledge, and I have learned far more, browsing Wikipedia, than I have in any academic facility. |
<br />I am the proud to have an insatiable thirst for knowledge, and I have learned far more, browsing Wikipedia, than I have in any academic facility. |
||
<br />I prefer [[Science fiction]] over [[Nonfiction]], and I believe in [[Extraterrestrial life]], [[Time Travel]], and "[[God]]." |
|||
<br /> |
|||
===My Education=== |
===My Education=== |
||
My education includes having received a high-honors diploma from [[Lake Central High School]], and I am currently attending my third semester at [[Purdue University Calumet]] for a degree in Mathematics/Computer Science. |
My education includes having received a high-honors diploma from [[Lake Central High School]], and I am currently attending my third semester at [[Purdue University Calumet]] for a degree in Mathematics/Computer Science. |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
I feel that the [[Copernican principle]] not only proves many [[Cosmology]] theories and ideas to be invalid (ie: I completely disagree with the [[Big Bang theory]]), but it is contextual to all things in general. In my own words, "The inability to have a matter analyzed in its entirety, makes any analysis of the matter invalid." By the same token, I feel that polls, studies, statistics, and their likeness are innately incorrect, regardless of how useful. |
I feel that the [[Copernican principle]] not only proves many [[Cosmology]] theories and ideas to be invalid (ie: I completely disagree with the [[Big Bang theory]]), but it is contextual to all things in general. In my own words, "The inability to have a matter analyzed in its entirety, makes any analysis of the matter invalid." By the same token, I feel that polls, studies, statistics, and their likeness are innately incorrect, regardless of how useful. |
||
<br />If one is familiar with the [[Possibility theory]], the [[Chaos theory]], and the [[Probability theory]] he/she will essentially understand that, the longer a probability is correct, the probability of it being incorrect exponentially increases. For this reason, conversing with me about (im)probabilities and/or the (un)likeliness that a particular event will occur will essentially "go in one ear, and out the other." |
<br />If one is familiar with the [[Possibility theory]], the [[Chaos theory]], and the [[Probability theory]] he/she will essentially understand that, the longer a probability is correct, the probability of it being incorrect exponentially increases. For this reason, conversing with me about (im)probabilities and/or the (un)likeliness that a particular event will occur will essentially "go in one ear, and out the other." |
||
<br />[[Darwin's theory of evolution]] is a much more accurate and intelligent way of explaining [[life on Earth]], compared to [[religion]]. |
|||
===Bad Habits=== |
===Bad Habits=== |
||
Revision as of 14:24, 21 June 2009
Robert M Johnson
Please direct any questions or comments to my talk page.
|
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Welcome!
Welcome to my User Page!
Are You
An Angry Individual?
One is most-likely to navigate onto this page, after the individual and I have come to disagree on a certain topic of discussion. When falling into this category of persons, I insist that one browses around until he/she feels that enough malcontent has accumulated to continue our discussion.
Just Curious?
If, by some chance, you are merely interested in me and are not searching for more ways to channel your anger at me, please take your time, and be sure to share your opinions and creative criticism on my Talk page.
About Me
In General
I am twenty-one years of age.
I have never used any illegal narcotics. I smoke (Newport (cigarette)) and I drink socially (Vodka Red Bull).
I view myself as an intelligent individual, and I value an intelligent conversation and/or argument over anything tangible.
Although I would very much enjoy being correct on every matter, I would be a liar by omission to claim that I am not free of my share of ignorance.
I am the proud to have an insatiable thirst for knowledge, and I have learned far more, browsing Wikipedia, than I have in any academic facility.
I prefer Science fiction over Nonfiction, and I believe in Extraterrestrial life, Time Travel, and "God."
My Education
My education includes having received a high-honors diploma from Lake Central High School, and I am currently attending my third semester at Purdue University Calumet for a degree in Mathematics/Computer Science.
Presently, I am attempting to receive several certifications elsewhere. The type of degree which I am pursuing at the university will most-likely not reflect my qualifications any more than a mere certification from a typical cert program. For this reason, the lack of job opportunities for recent college graduates, and the fact that most of my fellow students should have never passed the eighth grade, I feel that the "university" which I am currently attending is a waste of time and money.
Theories, Principles, Laws, Etc.
I feel that the Copernican principle not only proves many Cosmology theories and ideas to be invalid (ie: I completely disagree with the Big Bang theory), but it is contextual to all things in general. In my own words, "The inability to have a matter analyzed in its entirety, makes any analysis of the matter invalid." By the same token, I feel that polls, studies, statistics, and their likeness are innately incorrect, regardless of how useful.
If one is familiar with the Possibility theory, the Chaos theory, and the Probability theory he/she will essentially understand that, the longer a probability is correct, the probability of it being incorrect exponentially increases. For this reason, conversing with me about (im)probabilities and/or the (un)likeliness that a particular event will occur will essentially "go in one ear, and out the other."
Darwin's theory of evolution is a much more accurate and intelligent way of explaining life on Earth, compared to religion.
Bad Habits
I have a high tendency to replace proper punctuation with several periods (....)
Things One Should Know
I believe that everyone should be familiar with the knowledge imparted in this section.
A computer is completely incapable of creating a random number. All "random" variables generated on a machine actually rely on a seed.