User talk:Onorem/Archive 14

Archives

 

♠ 2006 ♠
♠ Jan 2007 ♠ Feb-March 2007 ♠ April-June 2007 ♠ July 2007 ♠ Aug-Sept 2007 ♠ Oct 2007 ♠ Nov-Dec 2007 ♠
♠ Jan 2008 ♠ Feb-March 2008 ♠ April-May 2008 ♠ June-July 2008 ♠ Aug-Oct 2008 ♠
♠ Nov 2008-Feb 2009 ♠ March-April 2009 ♠ June-Dec 2009 ♠
♠ Jan-Oct 2010 ♠
♠ Nov 2010-Nov 2011 ♠
♠ Nov 2011- September 2013 ♠
♠ October 2013-December 2023 ♠

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

Help Wikipedia.

If you have any intrest in or knowledge of Anrican films, go to this wikiproject [1] and join! If you don't, then spread this around. The African Films Task force needs you, so follow the link, or spread this post, so people can join the African Films Task Force. --RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210    16:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Image

How do you find out what images can and can't be used?

Nah,

You're not a pain. I learned something valuable. I thought the picture was removed do to a glitch. --Mrsausageman96 (Talk) (Guestbook) 20:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

im not

im not vandalizing wikipedia cory scott is my friend and these things actually happened i dare you to block me though fuck tard, go jerk off to a picture of your mom you loner with no friends livin out of his moms basement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjtwh (talk • contribs)

Impressive... --Onorem♠Dil 14:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

User talk:205.158.80.194

Where was the vandalism that led to this warning you left for this IP?

Also, you don't need to enter the entire web address (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Remember_Right_Now) ... just use the page name (Remember Right Now). --Onorem♠Dil 19:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

The vandalism was rolled back Blueking12 (talk) 20:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Nothing was rolled back. Their edits are still sitting at the top of the page history...and they aren't vandalism. --Onorem♠Dil 22:21, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't like you very much.

I do not like you very much and, accordingly, demand at once that you cease reverting my edits! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.165.10.94 (talk)

Good to know. --Onorem♠Dil 17:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Libapedia full of lie & you are just one more liar

You rejected my post because you said

"Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 22:28, 23 October 2008 (UTC)"

but if you look at the lib-a-pedia's accepted post just above it it says

"Bash Back! DC confronted the HRC once again for its legacy of transphobia and homonormative policies. "

Yah that is "NEUTRAL" alright. no you don't fool anyone, your joke of a website is just one my pro gay liberal rag like most of the others. any time someone post something that is the truth that you don't like, you just delete it. you are sad little Hitlers. No wonder no one uses your site for facts, it just one sided christian-hating, Gay loving claptrap — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.31.209.136 (talk)

I have absolutely no clue what you're talking about, but thanks for posting here so that I had a chance to notice your rant on Bash Back. Please stop adding unsourced information to articles. --Onorem♠Dil 18:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

You get the best vandals. freshacconci talktalk 18:29, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

And I'm turning this into wallpaper. freshacconci talktalk 18:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

reply

it appears the school's website hasn't been updated for several years. see the date at the source you cited--Certified.Gangsta (talk) 11:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

I see conflicting result in the google search. The last updated refers to the entire site. The page you cited was written way back in 2006.--Certified.Gangsta (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

The discussion is frankly over. You decide to unilaterally revert the article when a constructive ongoing discussion is taking place. This doesn't inspire confidence.--Certified.Gangsta (talk) 11:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Your source doesn't convince me. I know a guy from the school from a basketball tournament I attended. He can give me 1st person info on the situation.--Certified.Gangsta (talk) 11:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but "I met a guy who told me" isn't convincing enough for me to revert my changes. --Onorem♠Dil 12:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

User:NWA.Rep appears to be vandalising that page and the references prove that Alex Grant left at the end of December 2006. I showed him the reference a week ago http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NWA.Rep&diff=prev&oldid=251328410 DOUBLEBLUE (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Stop calling it vandalism. There's no reason to assume that he doesn't legitimately believe the information he's adding is correct. I happen to completely disagree with him, but that doesn't make his edits vandalism. --Onorem♠Dil 13:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

There's assuming good faith and then there's outright deliberately adding information that has been proved to be incorrect. What more proof does one need? This is ridiculous. I showed you that Grant left at the end of 2006 and George has been there since 2007. How about this and this? Is Grant doing double service at Kitsilano? How about the Ministry of Education? Are they lying too? No. He is clearly deliberately adding incorrect information even after being shown it was wrong. That is vandalism and he's playing you. DOUBLEBLUE (talk) 14:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

(?)

As pertains to the universe of Wikipedia, you may be correct. As pertains to falconry, you're in MY domain, and we -- that is, all falconers, and we're the undisputed experts on both the sport and the raptors (many of us being both biologists/vets and falconers) -- do not allow novices (who aren't yet qualified to even keep a hawk without supervision) to run their ignorant mouths or fingers. I've been at this 38 years now, and I have to check with Hal Webster to get the facts straight on some of this four-score's history. So please, help with the Wiki mysteries, but leave the quality of content to those of us who know what we're talking or typing about? (ASIDE: I find it amusing that you'll say that ALL are welcome to edit, but others in Wiki refused to allow me to add information on the West African f. Chicquera, even though I'm THE expert on the sub-species.) Thank you, in advance, for your cooperation and assistance. JT (talk) 14:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Replying to your message, you put some tags on that article as well, including some unrealistic ones. I take a great deal of offense to what some of your peers do, as well. You aren't alone in being offended. But no personal attacks were made, and any comments were in direct correlation to the actions and slights. I'll admit that others have been more abrasive and less helpful, and I DO appreciate your help in bringing the article to fit Wiki formatting syntax. But I DON'T appreciate you telling me that some wet-behind-the-ears apprentice falconer is welcome to plug his ignorance into the content of the article. Please, we have to respect the Wiki methods and formats, respect our ways as well. Falconry is a very old art/sport, and these traditions didn't form in a vacuum. We know what we're about. This year's apprentice will prattle on about the little he knows. Next year, he'll be contradicting himself and not even realize it. The year after, he'll begin to understand that he had no idea what he was prattling on about, and no basis for an opinion. After about 8-10 years, one finally empties the cup and begins to understand. But for whatever reason, perhaps the novelty of it all to them, apprentices are the very first to run on at the fingers in ignorance of the realities of the sport. I hope this adequately explains why I made the statement.

I'll admit bias regarding the Wiki volunteer staff. Some of you may be here to help, but all too many run roughshod over us if we're not into your little universe. Wiki's KNOWLEDGE is a good thing, but the formatting Nazis, and all of these rules about information, they're way over the top, counterproductive to real knowledge. Yes, I understand that people vandalize, etc. But when they do, that's easily enough figured out and fixed. Meanwhile, you risk losing tremendous wealths of legitimate information by being so rigid about your rules. Nothing I've ever put up is not verifiable... but you may have to do a bit of homework to prove it... and it's just not my job to spoon-feed the proof. I've already done the hard part of gaining the knowledge. If you want verification, ask. If your criteria is that the information all be published by some major house, you're being laughably unrealistic, as the world just doesn't work that way (and it is becoming less and less likely as electronic/digital media replaces paper text.) If Wiki is too rigid to adapt to that reality, it will unfortunately expire as it becomes less and less useful and relevant, contemporary. But enough of this. We both have things to do. JT (talk) 14:55, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but others of this volunteer staff have stringently insisted that the information MUST be published by a major house to be considered authentic.

Back on the editing... if you mean editing format, then of course, I'd agree. I even asked for help with that part. But editing CONTENT, substance, shouldn't be done by someone who isn't intimately familiar with the many nuances of the subject.

Thanks again for your help in formatting. Is there a Biography shell of some kind? JT (talk) 15:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I haven't edited the article you said i vandalised

Hello, not sure if you made a mistake or not but the page you said i "vandalised", I did not even visit, must be some mistake. It was apperently about a "LeBron James", never heard of him, never visited the page....i wouldn't even know how to edit a page if i wanted to....don't even know if i'm posting this in the right place...pleae explain Sniper Zed (talk) 06:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

JtP RFC

You may be interested in this Talk:Joe_the_Plumber#RFC:_Career_and_LicesningMattnad (talk) 20:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Mummies

The various articles mention the two mummies in Richmond. One of the articles mention the fact that there are only three mummies in the state of Indiana. Thus, two out of the three mummies in the state are in Richmond, Indiana, giving it the most mummies per capita.Peter Napkin Dance Party (talk) 23:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Having the highest mummies per capita in the state (if not the world) is at least on par with the sort of trivia the article currently lists, for example the un-sourced assertion that Richmond was 'once' (when?) known as "the lawnmower capital" (of what?).

The fact that Richmond is home to two Egyptian mummies while the state as a whole is home to only three mummies should clearly refute the claim that Richmond doesn't have the most mummies per capita in the State.

While I can't find the article online, the IndyStar a few years back published an article on Richmond's mummies. Further, the mummies in Richmond have been talked about on major Egyptology websites.

These are the reasons why I think it is notable that Richmond has the most mummies per capita in the state. I had wanted to make the claim that it had the highest mummies per capita for the entire United States of America, but I couldn't find a good source to that affect so I stopped short.

Thanks for your concern trying to make Wikipedia a better place, but I think in this instance it is misplaced.Peter Napkin Dance Party (talk) 23:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou.

Thank you for your gentle policing of our airspace. With your help i will once again be on the straght and narrow. Your quest for truth will one day triumph above the smut of tranquility. With love from me to you, we are kindred.

You are number six! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.104.82 (talk)

You're welcome. I'm glad you've seen the error of your ways... --Onorem♠Dil 14:57, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

I am not a number. I am a free man! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

ps.my sister likes you
pps. my brothers not so keen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.104.82 (talk)

a stranger told me not to talk to my friends. HELP ME!"

LISTEN TO ME WHEN I TALK TO YOU OR I WILL DO TWISTED THINGS TO YOUR PET DOG. LIKE FRENCH KISSING, and ANAL FISTING/. yeah!" damn right aka the sockpuppet mass debator twisted evil eye licker — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.104.82 (talk)

"Thank you"s go here? I appreciate the help re: Shocker Toys. I'll get my act together and do things within Wikipedia's rules...Cmock127 (talk) 13:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Finally

SOZ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.104.82 (talk)

Restoring deleted user talk page

I think there's a valid reason to restore warnings issued, but deleted by the user less than 5 minutes later. Aside from certain programs like Huggle seeming to rely on it to calculate automatic escalation, human editors use the presence of such warnings to judge escalation as well - no? ? Quaeler (talk) 20:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

There's a history tab. --Onorem♠Dil 20:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Also, see WP:BLANKING. --Onorem♠Dil 20:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Ya, i've always read WP:BLANKING to imply 'in a reasonable amount of time'. There is a scenario in which a warning is cleared out a day later, and there is scenario where someone immediately clears out a final warning -- to my mind, there are two separate motivations involved here. At any rate, we'll wait until he repeat-repeats. Thanks. Quaeler (talk) 11:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Redirect of Dean Wells Guitarist

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dean Wells Guitarist, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dean Wells Guitarist is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dean Wells Guitarist, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Rodney MacDonald

Hi Onorem,

Any User adding any information (including factual ones) to this page has their post promptly deleted if it does not met the approval of Mr. MacDonald's office. I challange you to make such a post; a solid, factual one showing a mistake by Rodney MacDonald that you can easily find in several mainstream media, and see how many seconds it takes to be removed. At the end of the day it doesn't make any difference in my life. I just think that it is a shame that Wikipedia is being used for propaganda purposes by a politician That will only give ammunition to the Wikipedia naysayers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanMacDonald (talk • contribs)

I don't doubt that there is some well sourced criticism that might belong in the article. I do doubt that everything you've added belongs, and the way you're going about it only hurts your position. Edit warring and socking are just going to lead to blocks and quick reverts. --Onorem♠Dil 15:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

tx:)

kjuries-awdjafindme?[sinsi alweizgetdeletedrielfast:(sven70<brTXSOMUCHtitanikefetudid,vvapreshieited-myarmsneedrest,+2amhere intw[imflemishtho-praps lemefinishurtranskriptevmyshorthandTOMORO/NEXTDAYS(aleta2dafoundation'dvcostedtaim2,soletsgetitrait sins ivdahelp ineednow w/dainput,txsomuch!!,nthenprapsputemBOTHversionsup,contrstinso2say,indahop4understandingnchang4dabeta-BIGTX!!:)[nothatiwantretribution,butidowant2beREHABILITATEDingoodorder,asdadisdu'n'fair,mycontribtnsTAKENATMERITinstedevdisregarded cozevinputproblms:(
/>ihopmyIPduzntchangbythen,wotsdasensinblokinwunsakountindef.,nowitsjustINCONVENIENTasigetnewIP's aldataim[dainamik alekeition--219.69.85.251 (talk) 14:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Reply on my talk page

I've replied on my talk page. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC) who is not watching this page

withisINTOLRANS,PISIN'CONTESTlangwidg,wotsdapoint-sumspelinetcnazitelinothers --219.69.85.251 (talk) 03:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)wotado?[n ican spel,butidisagre w/danoshen itshowzerudishen,eboniksbydef.rongetc-awcan1besoAROGANTnPRESUMPTUOUS[lemestikthere2theIMBECILIC ARCHAICSPELIN2MEIKMYPOINT!]??!![nthisrTALKPGSnotACTUALCONTENT! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.69.85.251 (talk)

Blokd'gen,seimOFENDINadmin[seicer--IDOWILTEIKTHISUPALUPIFIHAV2,TAKINONTHEFOUNDATIONIFSEENFIT-rtheyusingthosesoftwareprograms,nnoHOWBAD/INSUFICIENTHEYR???ISWMEEDIA ENABLIN VOISMESAGES??imfedupwtheswlawyersndo'lteik'emon,implukilikthat,we'lc![jesus,toleratinignoriniftheywant{finw/me,howeva1raits,noguarente itlgetRED,noskinfromynos,butjustBLATANTLIKEPDISCRIMINATIN[NTRYIN2SILENS-HOWWZTHAT4HARASMNT???]MEISNOTON!!!!!!!!INDISGUST,SVEN70,DRMEDVERELST,MD,MA I/EDUC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.69.68.109 (talk)

ifoldbezlikseicer thinktheycanHIJKwmediaASTHEIRPRIVETPLEIGROUND,bulyin,nnonsensikl-therzANTIDISKRIMINATIONWATCHBOARDZindaUSA,nwmeiad asaprivateorg isontheiradar-sokeepDISCRIMINATIN,IMPERILINdaWHOLEORG,weldun. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.69.68.109 (talk)

notoncehas anadminEXPLEINDas2wiTHEICANOTOLERATSHORTHAND,ESP.INLAITEVMYDISABILITY,which'dbeDA1.THING2DOFOR'EM INDASPIRITEVTHEVGUIDELINZ[me,igotsorhanzexplainin,2beLAUGHDAT! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.69.68.109 (talk)

Ted Prior

Hi You have removed about Ted Prior being in Play Girl. Unfortunatly I have just seen the pictures.....and Im at work too.

http://www.blackdogue.net/Playgirl/TedPrior/TedPrior.html

Do not look at work.... I assure you you will get into trouble, like im expecting. --Larsselleth (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Not planning to look at home either. WP:BLP requires removing unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Feel free to replace the information if it's sourced. --Onorem♠Dil 16:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Look who's talking!!

To his computer!! Sometimes one should not believe what other non-computer geeks are saying -- [by the way, what is the name of those 2 different kind of dashes?] Computer voice recognition seems to work, started this morning, what else to do after the Manchester United game laugh out loud -- Smiley.

Well, it's fair to say that you've been the catalyst of this turn for the better, so it's only my very due to say a heartfelt thank you very much!!

This opens indeed new doors as I was not even capable of writing a cover letter and updating my resume! Who knows, if next also the microscope learns to recognize my voice, anatomical pathology, here I come again!![if they forget about making money off dead bodies that is sad Smiley]

Furthermore, instead of just adding population size and land area to the introduction section of geographical articles, I might as well be bold and take on a translation say of a Chinese proverb article from Chinese wikipedia!!

Castles in Spain? Maybe, but in the mean I am also chiseling my phonetic knowledge, as the American pronunciation has been chosen/ set and not always one gets a way with British speak, or plainly unclear mumbling. [For example, the letter "p" I have to go to the books four, read wikipedia LOL, to look up what actually is peculiar about it in English so I can dictate "pie" without having to eventually having to manually type it in laugh out loud!

So once again: Thanks!!!Sven70[took me a whole hour, when not more huh]--219.69.81.128 (talk) 09:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, it's not all smooth sailing, the speech recognition program seems to make my computer unstable and in the present circumstances I won't be able to upgrade my machinery. Also Dragon NaturallySpeaking has some bugs in in it too it seems, and can be improved upon its user friendliness.

What regards my account, I'm afraid I'm too stubborn as feeling wronged in this whole process --perusing guidelinesI did not come across anything spelling out exactly what kind of English to use. Sure, one is advised to not be cryptic, not 2ramble and to be clear. But hey, if there already is a cut-off border, it won't be a clear one as there is a substantial gray zone [ what shall be used? American English? British English? I vote for Kiwi English! Shall Ebonics/eye English be outlawed and shorthand be ostracized? I guess you get my gist. But anyway, we'll see, thanks again for being the first truly helpful person i met on wikimedia!![especially that long and angry posting of mine -- normally I keep shorthand stuff short as I know it's hard on people trying to read, as they have no experience with shorthand or regrettably so on Wictionary with phonetic-- you did, acting as an ambassador and I really appreciate!]

Question: why doesn't this program sign full automatically? --219.69.81.128 (talk) 12:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Tanninglamp

Thanks for your help. That guy has been engaged in something like a 4-year edit war to try to insert a particular paragraph in the Rick Reilly article. I became aware of it just recently, from one of the administrator notice pages, and helped a little bit. I guess that's why I became the target of his wrath, such as it is. I don't do sockpuppetry, and I was curious who he thought I was a sockpuppet of, but he got "Plaxicoed" before he had the chance to elaborate. So it goes. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 05:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Note from Vovim Baghie

why did you revert my revision to Malphas's wikipedia Page?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malphas

Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 01:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Because we require that information comes from reliable and verifiable sources. Dictation from a demon from hell isn't exactly verifiable. --Onorem♠Dil 01:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Onorem. You have new messages at Optakeover's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you Onorem Dil

Thank you Onorem Dil

you seem to be the only person with an un-biased opinion, i am sorry for my impatience but this has happend to me many times and i am starting to get sick of it. thank you for bieng the sensible enough to talk to, even with my last attempts in the now [apparantly] banned account S.O.Malphas.

Oh and thanks for sticking up for me regarding optakes decision to label me a Vandelist. Aswell as jake wartenburg's blatant personal attacks [against my last account]

Vovim Baghie - Samurai Of Malphas (talk) 03:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Bro!!!

for helping me with the Ron Stone (music industry) article. Much appreciated. --Nothingisrael (talk) 21:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Ermysteds Grammer School

It is relevant because after over 200 years of the school being open to both day boys and boarders the boarding house was left vacant for two years awaiting redevelopment to accomodate more class rooms so that a larger number of pupils could be accomodated and thus more revenue generated from the LEA than was previously provided by the boarding fees.

The boarding house was slowly run down over the period of my being there in order to facilitate this move and the two remaining boarders [parents] had to fight tooth and nail with the Local Education Authority and the Governers to continue their education in the sixth form at the school of their choice.

The transition of the school from providing boarding facilities to becoming purely for day boys had an effect on outlying areas within the schools catchment area as a good proportion of the boarders were farmers sons from outlying settlements such as Malham and Kettlewell who, at the time, were provided with Government grants to board. The closure of School House affected their educational choices.

IMO the citation required tag is surplus to requirements as none of the other notable dates have sources cited and I already referenced myself as an eye witness. I could have stated all of the above in the entry and it would have been perfectly valid, I can even provide correspondance to and from the school and the LEA to corroborate the above but I kept it diplomatic and sanitised my comments.

I don't wish to be rude or to throw my ducks out of the bath but I'm not sure what qualifies you to be the sole adminstrator of the schools history, maybe you have a long standing connection with the school (teacher/governer)? but as someone who lived there 24/7 for seven years I feel that I at least have some first hand knowledge to comment on this period of the schools history.

Having said all of the above you can sanitise the contents of the entry all you want from this point forward, I believe I have said all I wish to say on the subject and indeed, have thrown at least one duck.

--swilmers (talk) 15:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

I have no relation of any kind with the school. The time you spent there is unimportant. Please provide a reliable source for the infomation you want to add. --Onorem♠Dil 15:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Sven 70

Sven 70would you mind having a look at suruenya ' s[no letter -y perhaps, I think,, it's the Spanish ~N] talk page where I left a message? Sorry this is so short. [Hands hurts] thanks in advance tho!--史凡 (talk) 06:27, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

suruenya answered, but I think I used the wrong word["skin" ]; I meant that on your and her user page, the letters do not appear on a white background, but on a light blue one, which seems to be easier on the eye [the white glare can give me headaches I finally figured out, up to Frank migraine attacks during a sensitive period as I'm having now]. I am not specialist enough with source language to just glean it up from your preferences, if other people already have access to such. Sorry to again have conjured up an orange bar on your wiki page! Shy smiley

by the by the way, did you know that hear ing Kaohsiung they have fireworks in the shape of the smiley and a heart? 10 minutes every nait over three weeks, the lantern Festival, hands down my favorite one, including free concerts by among others real famous bands, while local ones, like Mayday and Fish, a female singer from Malaysia, overseas Chinese as they say here, all that, just at my doorstep-- the fireworks I can even watch from my flat, worth 1,000,000 pounds over that stretch of time [in Taipei even 50% more of that] --I'm very much so looking forward to it!!

By the way number two, right now my speech recognition is working excellently: fast reaction time, almost each sentence letter perfect as I had it in my head, I guess it took me less than half an hour -- good, the occasional British received pronunciation of mine causes the program puzzlement, hiccups like in the above it not wanting to display their word period was annoying [i manually typed it now, sigh], and I had to restart my computer to have everything functioning it seemed [though it also might have been my microphone, old junk I have to deal with for now.] but anyway, as one thing, perhaps all the patient training with it in the end will pay off, I surely hope so! Smiley

If the next generation speech recognition software can also switch smoothly between languages [without that and the next thing I reckon it's almost impossible to edit to any extent on wictionary where I spend most of my time these days since me studying Chinese full time these days] and recognizes various different programs' input masks as standard, that is allow for full speech controlled editing of one's writings, then there is real hope I'll be up and running again, being fully functional, whether in private or professional contexts! Thanks again for having been the person who instigated this turn for the very much better it seems!!! [I have to leave it here for now, as a really bad headache seems to be brewing, if not a migraine attack, going by the aura worried smiley...--史凡 (talk) 12:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't really know much about skins or formatting pages. If you see something in my user space, it's very likely that I just found code somewhere else and copied it. Wikipedia:User Page Design Center/Style would probably be the best I could suggest as a place to start. Glad your software is working better, even if you still have to fix a few words here and there. It's got to be better than typing everything from scratch. --Onorem♠Dil 13:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree with your last statement; it'll be the conundrum for computer programmers that many programs need to be as user-friendly and glitch free as possible, not an easy task I guess and imagine, but that seems to be the requirements for optimal functionality of said programs-- in the case of speech recognition, it's thought ask for, such as software engineers thoroughly understanding the process of dictating, and quite some linguistic specialists stuff, along with it, quite a tall order, but as I noticed in my own life and profession, if you will do something real well, it asks for quite a lot! [I'm well placed as a reference person, I'm a perfectionist, whether I want it or not! Smiley]

I went to the user talk modification page/design Center; exactly the kind of stuff they mentioned I would like to have on all of my Wikipedia pages!! like the table of contents, moving to the right, and the text wrapping around it to the left , would be something that especially on wictionary would save me an additional click--encycloPetey already mentioned that be possible in general, though he didn't know how to do it. Specifically,. So now we move a little bit closer to solving that part of the puzzle , even when not completely there yet!thank both of you once again! Sven 70219.69.81.128 (talk) 04:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

dear dil [I cannot get my software to type your other name,. Sometimes it does , sometimes it doesn't],. I tried the following：

{{TOCright}}.

{| | style="background:blue; color:maroon" |

in spell colonhttp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:史凡/skins/Monobook/Main.css

Everything keeps looking the same tho, whether actual wiki PDia . Pages, or my own user page.

As Im doing this with an impending headache,. It's really frustrating -- and now I couldn't even find the "new section" button on your talk page, so I aded my comment here: I checked my preferences, they are still mono book defaultFor dis account in wictionary, but then again,I cannot even see anymore my login status as the icon disappeard somehow-- why can they not make, such computer things accessible for people, we all need to be computer engineers, software -- wise?? A frustrated--史凡 (talk) 06:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

What about these?

68.192.223.254, what about this, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3ACraftsman+Truck+Series&diff=264697387&oldid=259463332 and than this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.192.223.254&curid=21026830&diff=266962084&oldid=266221474 And it is not a shared Ip, he put that warning himself on his page. He is telling later to User :Kralizec!that nobody should touch his own page.

Moving stuff to the talk page Nobody should touch or use my user talk or user talk page other than myself. Not even you. You should send this message to other Wikipedia users. You shouldn't listen to User:Gmatsuda. Thanks. 68.192.223.254 (talk) 8:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Warrington (talk) 14:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I remove those because I don't want that it sould look like it was meant to you. Ok, you want to Agf him, but my question is. What if he will make more vandalism edits? You can not warn him because he is not letting anyone touch his page. Now how does that sounds? What can you do with a person like this (and I am pretty sure that he will make more trouble) if he will vandalise more pages? Or not vandalize but will make a lot of unconstructive edits. Lately he changed http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toyota_Supra&diff=prev&oldid=266125475 twice was a car to is a car to a car where production stopped 2007. I could not put any warnings on his page, I didn’t even tried... Everything is a mess on that page.

Warrington (talk) 15:27, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok. Actually, you were righ, I checked myself the other users final warning series and not all of them were bad edits. But it looked a little scary with all those red warnings.

Warrington (talk) 15:43, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!

I just wanted to say thanks for helping out with the daily vandalism on Talk:Panzer Dragoon Saga. I've been having to revert this guy's edits for so long now, and even the admins are starting to turn a blind eye to it, so...seriously, thanks. I really appreciate it. -- Nate D. (talk) 22:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Not at all a problem. I noticed your page protection request, and added the article to my watchlist. I'll happily revert him every day. He'll get bored with it before I do. --Onorem♠Dil 13:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Dear Onorem

I'm new in Wikipedia. So please let me introduce myself, I'm real big Swatch fan and collector of the watches and Bijoux from a long time. I also have access to Swatch press information so that is why sometimes the texts I have added seems too commercial but I think that the content is good and should be shared... All this to inform you that I have restored the introduction for Swatch page because I think it resume all aspects of the Brand even if it is a text comming from Swatch... Feel free to delete again if you feel you need to... I also have access to Swatch picture for the press (rights belonging to Swatch and ok to share) that I would like to insert but do not know how, maybe you could help me? All the best, Swatchy -Swatchy (talk · contribs)

fuck off

fuck off you wanker — Preceding unsigned comment added by TL 4 HB (talk • contribs)

Thank you for the advice. --Onorem♠Dil 15:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

HAHAHA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpaoewfjewf (talk • contribs)

Note from Pwrinkle

Dear Onorem I like your penis in my mouth.----Your mother — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pwrinkle (talk • contribs)

Thanks for dropping by mom. I really wish you'd stop vandalizing and trolling though. --Onorem♠Dil 15:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Bujinkan

Do you think we should request semi-protection for Bujinkan? as it has been 3 months of reverts & asking the IP to talk and getting no response? --Nate1481 12:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Ducommun

Will appreciate your checking the referance added earlier today. Hopefully this responds to your earlier comment.

Thank you.

--RDucommun (talk) 17:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Angdl

Wtih all due respect Onarem, but that "conversation" was between us. It wasn't a discussion page or a poll wherein people could vote a "delete" or "not". I didn't delete the comment numerous times. It just so happens that I may have deleted it after you pasted back the comments. Anyways, out of curiousity, if the article does get deleted, would I still be allowed to make the article on my user page instead? I did, after all, work hard to make that article, just so you know. I may start making other articles about persons from Cagayan de Oro and I'm hoping you won't have any biases to just automatically put it in the AfD simply because I'm the author. FYI, it's not even a bad article. It's a very well formatted and worded one. You may not know who's who is famous from a certain local city because you're not from the same city, no offense. Think of it as, if you were from Australia and didn't know the famous people from Macau, China, you would immediately think "I don't know the guy or even seen him on TV; he can't be famous". You should take into consideration that he's famous in Cagayan de Oro City, not in the whole world. How many famous people from Kazakhstan do you know? I bet, other than Borat, which is fictional anyways, no one. Of course, I mean, without you looking at the People from Kazakhstan article, that is. A request though, could you please delete that AfD sign on top of my article? I don't mind the other marks, just that one because it's so BIG and it's taking up most of the page, at first glance. Just keep the discussion page we're in, but delete that AfD sign, please. Angdl (talk) 14:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Angdl: Again

Really? Oh, that's something new for me. I was thinking, that the discussion tab (which is red, by the way, which means it doesn't exist) on top of that article is where discussion are for. Well, anyways, I could make it verifiable by adding links BUT the problem is, where the statements of Napoleon are..... are in his personal web page which happens to be a friendster (similar to myspace) site. Which means, it's verifiability isn't going to be accepted by wiki since it's some sort of dating/friends networking site. But that's just it, which would be more reliable, a statement coming from the person's personal web page or from 3rd party sources? But anyways, okay, so it has unverifiable statements BUT...look at this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joem_Bascon

It says it has unverifiable data but it doesn't have a bid AfD sign hogging up the page. Joem Bascon's page is even too short and even ugly compared to Napoleon's page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: 3

Thanks for the 2 notices moved to the end of the page thingy. But...the statement came from the person itself...like if a reliable website said that this X guy is bisexual but on mr X's page, it says he's just gay, who would you rather believe? Well, anyways, could I just move it to my user page instead? At least that way, I'll be able to expand it and find sources. Google won't be able to Google up that page anyways. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: Move Request

I have to go now. Could you please move the Napoleon Dagalea article to my page? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Angdl

By the way, since it's on a userpage... please remove those 3 notices. Please and thank you. This may sound demanding, but could you move it...like....now? I don't want it to get deleted, so to prevent it from being deleted, and since you don't like userfying deleted articles, I want it to be moved ASAP. It'll be on my userpage anyways. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: Why?

Why would it not fit in my userpage when it's my work? I'll improve it somehow. Okay, just put in the discussions that. Thanks ahead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: Ok

My intentions of the deletion of the other comment left by other people was about the ABS CBN thing. Since I deleted my post about the ABS CBN thing, it wouldn't make sense for the other readers to see someone else argue about the notability of that ABS CBN link without seeing my former post first. I left the other comments that had no ABS CBN in it. I just wanted to clear that up that I wasn't intentionally vandalizing at that time. By the way, striking the comment would still make it readable if you look real close. But anyways, how do I know if an admin did or did not approve of the movement to the userpage? Because, personally, I could just blank the whole article and copy+paste the page data to my userpage to make it faster. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: Well, yeah, but...

Why would they still want to AfD delete an already blanked page? Meanwhile, my userpage is...well...for expansion and improvement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: Hope you don't mind

For an organized look, I put all the tags (AfD, need sources, notability issue, rescue, together with the tag saying that it's a martial arts biography stub) on a new section of the article named "Tags". If you don't like it, feel free to move back the AfD tag back on top, as it was a day ago, with the other tags on the bottom. But please, put a break (br) before the tags on the bottom to make it look more organized. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: Alright, my bad

I just thought that, since you already moved 2 already, might as well move the other one. Kinda like, if you raped and killed a person, you might as well take the wallet and mobile phone since you're going to jail anyways. But, I thought wrong. Well, I added a break below the AfD tag to make it look more organized. Yes, it's not a webhost, but hey, you just think that way because you're not from my city. If you see someone who'd bound to be famous, you'll know that sources will come up. Who ever knew Manny Pacquiao would have became legendary when he was just a skinny kid with a dream in a gritty city with no money? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: Ok then...

But anyways, how do I know if an admin did or did not approve of the movement to the userpage? Will the decision be seen on the debates page? And even if it wouldn't save it from deletion, why would they want to AfD delete a blanked article? And, sure Wikipedia is no crystal ball but, take this article as an example: Joem Bascon. He hasn't had any other relibale source since 2007 and that source simply stated that he didn't want to be known to just look like two other famous stars. I don't hate the guy though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: WHAT?

Hey man, I didn't do anything bad to you, except for giving you some trouble with replying on my usertalk page. Why do you dislike me so much? I mean, if I moved it to my user page, you'd still nominate it for deletion. What's your problem with me? I'm just a starting editor, like you were, long ago. Why are you giving me such a hard time? I don't care about Joem Bascon as well. I don't even know what he looks like. It's just an example that he, a Filipino, same nationality of my person's article, who only had one source and the source simply stated that he wanted his own image, didn't get an AfD, along with many others' I didn't find, while my article, looking better with infos and pictures and more organized than Joem's and many others such as Valerie Garcia, did. I personally don't hate you, but what's with all the heat coming from you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: My article is already deleted

I deleted all discussion related to it since no one needs to debate about an already deleted article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

I wasn't talking about a deletion discussion for Napoleon Dagalea, which no longer needs a debate. I was talking about one for User:Angdl. --Onorem♠Dil 12:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Angdl: It's my userpage

What you're doing is like commanding someone how to arrange the furnitures in his/her room. Well, it's his/her room, not yours. Besides, I'm gonna use it for improving the formerly deleted article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: Is there anyway to delete every piece of data of Napoleon Dagalea from Wikipedia?

I have transferred to different wiki site to upload his data there but each time I try to google him, on the top of the list is wikipedia's entires, which link to deleted files: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Napoleon_Dagalea AND http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon_Dagalea.

I no longer want to have any data of Napoleon Dagalea whatsoever in wikipedia, is there anyway to compeltely delete his existance from wikipedia? That way, other wikis where I uploaded his data would come out on top of google searches? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: Please clarify what you meant by the following italized text

"The deleted article will eventually make it's way out of google's cache."

Please, courtesy delete every discussion of him to a point it won't be recovered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: But

There's still a page about the AfD, though it only showed a courtesy blanked tag. There's still a page about Napoleon Dagalea when I google search it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: Could you delete the whole AfD discussion page about him?

Even the articles for rescue squadron still has his name on google, though I checked and there was none. The userpage, I don't really mind, it's not an official wikipedia article anyways, so it doesn't matter. I could put there that I smashed my computer or stabbed my TV and it wouldn't matter anyways. How do I make this google cache disappear? And like, how long would it take to disappear? 2 weeks? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: But your completely sure that the google cache will disappear soon?

Be my guest and delete my userpage yourself. Delete every bit of info about Napoleon Dagalea, even these discussions on your talk page so that google won't pick up anything about Napoleon Dahalea that's connected with en.wikipedia.org. Save, the commons, etc, since it's free images anyways. I could upload a picture of my dog there if I wanted and no one would mind anyways. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: Why archive?

When you could just completely delete it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angdl (talk • contribs)

Angdl: What about the other sections it's in?

Such as the articles for deletion debate, it still has a tag about it being "courtesy blanked" and the rescue squadron still has his name in there via goggle search.

Angdl: WP:BLP concerns?

Is there any way to make his page a part of those WP:BLP concerns, so that it will get deleted?

Thanks!

Thank you for battling the vandalism on my user page! Regards, CLW (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

No problem. --Onorem♠Dil 13:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Angdl and his article

Hi, just wanted to let you know. After the deletion of the article he created, User:Angdl suddenly went on a blanking spree trying to have all history of the article's deletion removed from WP. A look at his contributions [2] includes this edit summary - "I do not want his name to be existent in any wikipedia article, including AfD debates.". *But* it's kinda hard to AGF, seeing as he's maintaining the entire, unaltered article on his userpage at User:Angdl. If he truly wants the name to be eradicated from every article, that theoretically should include his userpage. Now I've been thinking, (and AGF aside), he might want all deletion discussions wiped so that he could show the "article" (which, while in userspace is clear to us WPedians as not really an article but not to those not acquainted with how WP works) to his friends, to show off that he "has a wikiepdia article" on himself/his friend/whoever. I am not sure how to proceed with this since this is the first time I've seen something like this on WP. Shrumster (talk) 10:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Then, by all means, delete my userpage

It's not an article anyways. I don't see why a userpage is such a big deal anyways. Angdl (talk) 12:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Fine, I'll blank it

Done Angdl (talk) 13:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)