Jump to content

Talk:Gaëtan Dugas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Validinformation - "Clarification: "
Line 27: Line 27:


http://www.nybooks.com/articles/4227 <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Validinformation|Validinformation]] ([[User talk:Validinformation|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Validinformation|contribs]]) 15:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/4227 <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Validinformation|Validinformation]] ([[User talk:Validinformation|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Validinformation|contribs]]) 15:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== I would remove the quote ==

from Randy Shilts' book. Though it's a good quote from the book, it is at most a semi-ficticous event and only possibly representative of an event that Dugas participated in. It belongs, if anywhere, in the And The Band Played On article, but not in Dugas' article.

Any thoughts?

[[Special:Contributions/207.237.228.71|207.237.228.71]] ([[User talk:207.237.228.71|talk]]) 07:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:32, 18 June 2008

WikiProject iconBiography Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconLGBTQ+ studies Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 16:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The theory claimimg Dugas as Patient Zero discarded ?

The HIV would have entered the USA through Haiti and not Dugas, according to the research of Dr Worobey

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-10/uoa-hpo102507.php

Sseb22 10:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

The page is pretty hostile to the Patient Zero hypothesis, and perhaps with good reason. But I feel it should point out that few people refute how prolifically Dugas did spread the virus, and when it was at extremely low levels in the population, even if he wasn't the first person to spread it in NA. He was probably one of the first people to spread so much of the disease. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.231.33 (talk) 14:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Patient Zero is well refuted. Those that do not refute "Patient Zero" and the victimization and exploitation of Gaetan Dugas also fear sailing vessels due to their firmly held conviction that the world is flat. The clarification above is by no means a clarification. The original CDC researchers that published their findings about Patient Zero later refuted the study as being bias and empirically flawed. Gaetan Dugas was simply a product of his times. A man that was exploited by the CDC to play into the mass homophobic hysteria concerning AIDS at the time. A man exploited by Ralph Shilts to garner a New York Times review of And The Band Played On at the time of its publication. As if something as complex as HIV and AIDS could have possibly had such a simple etiology. Why must people cling to such simplistic explanations for something so complex as the origins and etiology of HIV? How incredible naive the 1980s populous now appears. The 1980s have now passed. Scapegoating AIDS as a gay only virus is now passe. Notice the discontinuance of such terminology as Gay Cancer and GRIDS. All misnomers of their time. Such is the true for the tragic life of Gaetan Dugas. Vilifying him for all posterity only allows the AIDS hysteria and homophobia of the 1980s to live on.

References: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-10/uoa-hpo102507.php

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/4227 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Validinformation (talkcontribs) 15:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would remove the quote

from Randy Shilts' book. Though it's a good quote from the book, it is at most a semi-ficticous event and only possibly representative of an event that Dugas participated in. It belongs, if anywhere, in the And The Band Played On article, but not in Dugas' article.

Any thoughts?

207.237.228.71 (talk) 07:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]