Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Worsley: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
delete
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Film
Line 5: Line 5:
'''Delete''' No actual films mentioned, nor any projects in the works. Subject not listed in imdb,which is an exclusive and all emcompassing film reference, hence until it appears there should definitely not appear on a general encyclopedia such as this [[User:Waterloo86|Waterloo86]] ([[User talk:Waterloo86|talk]]) 04:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
'''Delete''' No actual films mentioned, nor any projects in the works. Subject not listed in imdb,which is an exclusive and all emcompassing film reference, hence until it appears there should definitely not appear on a general encyclopedia such as this [[User:Waterloo86|Waterloo86]] ([[User talk:Waterloo86|talk]]) 04:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', I couldn't find any significant coverage of this individual in web searches. [[User:Jfire|Jfire]] ([[User talk:Jfire|talk]]) 05:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', I couldn't find any significant coverage of this individual in web searches. [[User:Jfire|Jfire]] ([[User talk:Jfire|talk]]) 05:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|list of Film-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:the wub|the wub]] [[User_talk:The wub|<font color="green">"?!"</font>]] 12:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 12:48, 17 March 2008

Jonathan Worsley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete No actual films mentioned, nor any projects in the works. Subject not listed in imdb,which is an exclusive and all emcompassing film reference, hence until it appears there should definitely not appear on a general encyclopedia such as this Waterloo86 (talk) 04:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]