User talk:Adam.J.W.C.

User talk:Adam.J.W.C./Previous discussions...Do not edit

Smile

♠TomasBat has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Also thanking you for your reply. Cheers, ♠TomasBat 22:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		Long time, you still seem to be working hard. This is for all your contributions to Tourism related articles and templates, especially ones belonging to India. Cheers, Lara_bran 03:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

New Messages below this header

Pov in India

Hey,

Just to let you know, that if you keep reverting my edit on the poverty in india page, I'm gonna have to report you to ANI because there has been a discussion and people who did not want the image there drastically outnumbered the people who did 3 to 1. And so now, since consensus has been established, you are just vandalising the page. So, please dont revert my edit. Thanks Nikkul (talk) 07:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Are you a comedian or ......? most of the people there were previously informed, that was WP:CANVASS. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 22:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• I see two issues here. The first one is the image and it's inclusion or not, the second is the conduct of Nikkul. To address the second, mayhap it's time to open an RfC on him. Xdenizen (talk) 01:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you think we should take it this far, would there be enough there to take it to RfC, I haven't actually done this before. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 01:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Well that depends on what you think needs to be done. The RfC page explains what and how it works. Do you think the actions of this editor need to be brought to the attention of the Community? Xdenizen (talk) 02:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Its hard to say, even though he is a pest, I am not quite sure if his edits are severe enough to report. If you go through his history you will find that he has had a troubled history with wikipedia and all this is related to photos or either sock puppets. Soon after the poverty in india situation he was at it again, disputing other images in other articles. I have seen his history and he is renowned for edit waring, licencing problems and so on. I think the main part of his problem is wanting to add his photos/uploads to articles and remove other. If you have a look at his user page he has a count on how many images he has added to articles. This makes me think that he thinks that he has some kind of monopoly on what goes into these articles. Try and change an image that he has on his special count on his user page and to him this would be some kind of offense. As for reporting him to rfc well I am not quite sure if it is a serious enough case but will look into this. I don't think that reporting him here would make much of a difference if he is still allowed to edit. I think its also a dominance thing as well. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 03:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

You may want to have a look at these pics in these articles that he has on his list, see if you can find better for the article, if you can replace them. He also uploads under a different name on commons, this name is commons:User:Indianhilbilly and also has this account that was deleted over there http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User:Nikkul. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 03:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Yeah, I've checked it out. He's got a bit of a history. I think he might just be bit enthusiastic and not keen on being criticised, even if it's constructive. He just doesn't seem to work well with others. Personally he doesn't stress me all that much. I'm mostly a vandal reverter so I don't have a great deal to do with him. My feeling is that if people are of the opinion he's being tendentious or disruptive then take it to RfC and have it resolved that way. Xdenizen (talk) 04:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that, I might sit back for a while and let things cool down. You are also right about him not working well with others. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 05:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• No prob. Taking the Path of Laid-Backness is always wise in this place. It's just the Intahwebz, after all. ;) Xdenizen (talk) 05:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This user's edits are very disruptive. This user always try to put images he had uploaded without judging relevancy and delete images and edits which are relevant. A request for comment, although may not necessary now, may be needed in future. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Not a Bearded Dragon

The image you put and then restored to Bearded Dragon is actually not a bearded dragon. If you knew about these lizards, or read the article, or looked at the other pictures, you'd know this. That lizard has spines running down its back all the way down its tail. beard dragons have spines running only down the sides to the back legs, and not all the way down the tail. I will do research on your critter to find out what he is, but in the meantime please don't add him back. 137.142.181.179 (talk) 02:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)