User:John: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
RandomXYZb (talk | contribs) Undid revision 171290128 by 82.30.75.250 (talk) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
</div> |
</div> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Hi |
|||
| valign=top style="border-width: 0px 6px 0px 0px; padding: 10px 10px 10px 10px; border-style: none double none none; border-color: #458B00; background-color: #FFFFF3; -moz-border-radius: 0px 0px 0px 0px;" | |
| valign=top style="border-width: 0px 6px 0px 0px; padding: 10px 10px 10px 10px; border-style: none double none none; border-color: #458B00; background-color: #FFFFF3; -moz-border-radius: 0px 0px 0px 0px;" | |
||
Revision as of 21:35, 13 November 2007
Wednesday
8
January
13:57 UTC
Welcome to John's user page
on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit This page is best viewed in Mozilla Firefox. Don't forget to maximize! | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Wise words
We need admins that can make snap judgements, and then go back and gracefully change what they did if it turns out wrong (that is very important, this is a wiki and we are making it all up as we go along), and at the same time admins who can think long and hard about complicated things and make the right decision on the first try, and admins who can tell which approach is needed in which case.User:Lar, here Quote of the week
All editors should always endeavor to treat each other with kindness, or else find another hobby. User:Jimbo Wales, here. Apologia
I had been using Wikipedia and following the news stories about it for quite a while when I got into an argument with someone on a newsgroup about Wikipedia's reliability as a source. As I defended the Wiki principle of "anyone can edit", I realised that I could be editing instead of talking about it. That was in late 2005. I wouldn't spend as much time as I do on it if I didn't still think Wikipedia was a great project. It attracts predominantly the right sort of people, who want to write an on-line encyclopedia of human knowledge. How cool is that? I respect the goals of the project, and so I support Wikipedia philosophies and policies, particularly WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL, WP:3RR, WP:NPOV and WP:VAND, to the hilt. For my favourite policy, see WP:BEANS. This is amazing! It sums up how we can use conflicts to build our community instead of letting them tear us apart. I recommend that everyone read it. Main activities and areas of interest
My stylistic hates (aka "Wikipedia shoot-on-sight")
Links
RfA . Favourite quotations, etc . Favourite contributions . Awards . Highlights . Gallery . Gallery, part 2 . Tools . Accountability |
|
- Wikipedia administrators
- User en-N
- User fr-2
- User de-2
- WikiProject Africa participants
- Wikipedians interested in Africa
- WikiProject Scotland participants
- Wikipedians interested in Scotland
- WikiProject Novels participants
- WikiProject Zimbabwe participants
- Wikipedians on the Typo Team
- Wikipedia administrators open to recall