User talk:Thatcher/Alpha: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
==[[User:Tweety21]]== |
==[[User:Tweety21]]== |
||
First let me say that I trust your good faith judgment as an admin in unblocking Tweety21. But I have some concerns. She appears to be removing whois templates from anonymous talk pages, specifically [[User talk:142.205.212.203]]. I am assuming it is Tweety21, but there is some uncertainty because she continues to edit anonymously as best I can tell, including from [[User:142.205.212.203]]. She also appears to have removed (without admin permission that I know of) content from [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tweety21]] while editing under [[User:142.205.212.203]]. I am trying to figure out whether she has been given permission to do some of these things, or whether she is up to her vandalism tricks again. Thanks. [[User:Ward3001|Ward3001]] 17:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC) |
First let me say that I trust your good faith judgment as an admin in unblocking Tweety21. But I have some concerns. She appears to be removing whois templates from anonymous talk pages, specifically [[User talk:142.205.212.203]]. I am assuming it is Tweety21, but there is some uncertainty because she continues to edit anonymously as best I can tell, including from [[User:142.205.212.203]]. She also appears to have removed (without admin permission that I know of) content from [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tweety21]] while editing under [[User:142.205.212.203]]. I am trying to figure out whether she has been given permission to do some of these things, or whether she is up to her vandalism tricks again. Thanks. [[User:Ward3001|Ward3001]] 17:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Ward== |
|||
Can you please help me Ward continues to display my work address, I believe he is on a rampage as a result of me not keeping blocked, this display of my address puts my safety at risk...I dont understand why he is harassing me, will email admin as well as this violates wiki privacy policy. |
Revision as of 17:32, 6 October 2007
Tweety21
I have to say I'm a little disappointed that she's been unblocked so quickly, and without hearing from those involved in her Wikidrama. Please read my comments on her talk page. Precious Roy 21:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- I appreciate that. If this person has learned from her mistakes, then a block is no longer necessary. If not, then she will be quickly reblocked. Thatcher131 22:01, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
For the barnstar. It's much appreciated. =) Tony Fox (arf!) 05:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Tweety21 16:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC) I appreciate your help! you can imagine my devistation when I saw on "Someones" talk page a reference to where I may work because of tracking down my IP ( at the time there was no block on my account or sock puppet accusation) I thought to myself "What on earth did I get myself into...good greif!" and things just sort of escalated from there. but enough said I know a certain person will be eye-balling this post so I am just going on my merry way (hopefully never to run into that person again!) P.S for what its worth! I am in no way, shape or form conected with Arden Wohl..seriously, the girl wouldnt know me if she fell on me, I wrote her a fan email once or twice but thats about it.. but I have also emailed Brad Pitt, also does not know me! Cheers!Tweety21 16:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Good luck in the future. Try not to take editing or deletion requests too seriously, and remember you can ask for advice at the Helpdesk if you have questions or concerns. Thatcher131 16:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Tweety21 17:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC):O) thanks! sorry for all the drama, it was just kinda scarey! seriously! I mean I just got into this as a hobby and things just got out of hand! if you check the ip for Darcy Monaco ( I mean its kind of funny she used her name-just shows she did not know policy-but I dont think she deserved "abusive sock puppet" on her page- I mean really! how embarassing! I think she just did one edit from my recollections anyway-did'nt know policy-ie can't edit for friends) it was just that everything got so personal...:O) can you imagine having someone write "edits from the London Public Library" -this could almost be the prefice for a scary movie-haha! have a good one! I am off work and trying to enjoy my Thanksgiving weekend, but thanks to you I really have something to be thankful for- I don't underestime how you've helped me, I am sure that most people on wiki are pretty decent, but you know you always see these news programs where people geted tracked down from the internet-sort of scarey, especially if you are a girl living on your own-cheers!Tweety21 17:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Tweety21 12:26, 6 October 2007 (UTC) Hi Thatcher131, can you unblock and removie personal info off the following page? 142.205.212.203 thanks! I dont plan on editing off this page anymore but again its a privacy issue, and since I was unblocked I guess its appropriate...thanks againTweety21 12:26, 6 October 2007 (UTC) Tweety21 12:38, 6 October 2007 (UTC)one last thing-regarding the Monaco thing-I think she just made the one edit because something I had wrote was inaccurate (re:people Arden has dated..or something like this-I guess people who work for celebs sometimes throw in an edit or two-but I think its all innocent as they don't know the conflict of interest policy-see this case in point:[1] also note that Yamla also put on his talk page how he received an email from Bebe Buell. Regards, (I am confused as I thought the checkuser would have cleared that two editors are from two different countries-sorry I just hate being accused of unethical behavior-studied Ethics in college!)
First let me say that I trust your good faith judgment as an admin in unblocking Tweety21. But I have some concerns. She appears to be removing whois templates from anonymous talk pages, specifically User talk:142.205.212.203. I am assuming it is Tweety21, but there is some uncertainty because she continues to edit anonymously as best I can tell, including from User:142.205.212.203. She also appears to have removed (without admin permission that I know of) content from Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tweety21 while editing under User:142.205.212.203. I am trying to figure out whether she has been given permission to do some of these things, or whether she is up to her vandalism tricks again. Thanks. Ward3001 17:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Ward
Can you please help me Ward continues to display my work address, I believe he is on a rampage as a result of me not keeping blocked, this display of my address puts my safety at risk...I dont understand why he is harassing me, will email admin as well as this violates wiki privacy policy.