Jump to content

Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 134079655 by 213.121.241.210 (talk) Remove "Who really cares?"
Enano275 (talk | contribs)
Line 26: Line 26:
"their Progressive Democrat coalition partners collapse." This made me smile. You mean they all fainted or something? Please change to something like "saw their vote collapse"? [[User:Willy turner|Willy turner]] 07:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
"their Progressive Democrat coalition partners collapse." This made me smile. You mean they all fainted or something? Please change to something like "saw their vote collapse"? [[User:Willy turner|Willy turner]] 07:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
:It would become rather long if someone was to do that, I think that is the reason it is slightly clumsy to start with. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] 09:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
:It would become rather long if someone was to do that, I think that is the reason it is slightly clumsy to start with. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] 09:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
*About Venezuela. I oppose the shut down, but I must admit, that headline is very biased. How about: "The [[Venezuela]]n [[Government of Venezuela|government]] forces the private [[television network]] [[RCTV|Radio Caracas Television]] to shut down, by denying a renewal of its broadcasting license and replacing the station with the state-sponsored channel [[TVes]]."--'''''[[User:Enano275|enano]]''''' <sup>([[User_talk:Enano275|Talk]])</sup> 00:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


==Errors in ''Selected anniversaries''/''On this day''==
==Errors in ''Selected anniversaries''/''On this day''==

Revision as of 00:21, 29 May 2007


Error reports
Please only post error reports regarding what is currently on the main page or on Main Page/Tomorrow here.
For general main page discussions, go to Talk:Main Page.

Note that the current date and time are in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), which may not coincide with your local time zone. The next day's featured article of the day, picture of the day, and anniversaries update at midnight (00:00) according to UTC. The current time is 20:03 on December 18, 2024 (UTC).

Once an error has been fixed, the error report will be removed from this page; please check the page's history to verify that the error has been rectified and for any other comments the administrator may have made. Lengthy discussions should not take place here.



Errors in the Main Page summary of Today's featured article

Errors in In the news

  • A.C. Milan win ... ? A.C. Milan wins ... ?

Perhaps we should use gerunds or passive voice to avoid this singular vs plural problem that we keep getting with sports news on ITN. --199.71.174.100 22:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC) A.C. Milan won would work as well Spartyboy40 21:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should be always in present tense so your gerund suggestion might do the trick. --Howard the Duck 12:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"their Progressive Democrat coalition partners collapse." This made me smile. You mean they all fainted or something? Please change to something like "saw their vote collapse"? Willy turner 07:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would become rather long if someone was to do that, I think that is the reason it is slightly clumsy to start with. J Milburn 09:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in Selected anniversaries/On this day

Errors in Did you know?

I do not believe that "combated" is a word. I suggest "fought". Cardamon 03:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It turns out that it is a word. Cardamon 03:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

::Yes, who knew indeed?! I learn something new every day in Wikipedia :) 'Combated' --Eqdoktor 07:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"the Polish air force combated in the victory of Lublin-Brest Offensive"? Please change to either "the Polish air force saw combat in the victory of Lublin-Brest Offensive", or "the Polish air force took part in the victory of Lublin-Brest Offensive" Willy turner 07:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree - that reads a lot better than "combated". Combated may be a word but its very clumsy in that sentence. --Eqdoktor 08:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
'Combated' sounds far better than 'saw combat', and 'took part' doesn't sound nearly as interesting. I think 'combated' is the best word for this fact. J Milburn 09:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt the bread in the photo is pumpernickel. The texture is too light, the bread has a somewhat rounded, defined crust. This is uncharacteristic of pumpernickel. It appears to be another type of dark rye bread. Edwin s 09:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Follow-up and old items

This holding area is for items that require further follow-up (for example, a general point that needs to be raised elsewhere), or for items that haven't been dealt with but where the topic under discussion is no longer on the Main Page. The items listed here should eventually be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as:

Any other problems

Please report other problems on Talk:Main Page.