Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sandbox/Archive: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sandbot (talk | contribs)
m Sandbot (talk) (contributions): Manual reset of sandbox.
DavidBild (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Please leave this line alone (sandbox heading)}}
{{Please leave this line alone (sandbox heading)}}
<!-- Hello! Feel free to try your formatting and editing skills below this line. As this page is for editing experiments, this page will automatically be cleaned every 12 hours. -->
<!-- Hello! Feel free to try your formatting and editing skills below this line. As this page is for editing experiments, this page will automatically be cleaned every 12 hours. -->

'''Allia Potestas''' was a freedwoman from the Roman town of [[Perugia]] who lived sometime during the 2nd-4th century CE.<ref name="horsfall85>Horsfall, N: ''CIL VI 37965 = CLE 1988 (Epitaph of Allia Potestas): A Commentary'', ZPE 61: 1985: pp251</ref> She is known only through her epitaph, found on a marble tablet in Via Pinciana, [[Rome]] in [[1912]]. The inscription, considered to be one of the most interesting of Latin epitaphs<ref name="gordon83">Gordon, A.E: ''Illustrated Introduction to Latin Epigraphy'': Berkely 1983</ref>, is unique because it contains both typical epitaphic information and more personal and sexual details.<ref name="norsfall85"/>

== Date ==
Much controversy surrounds the exact dating of the epigraph. Upon first discovery, the work was dated to around 300CE on [[Palaeography|paleographic]] grounds.



== References ==
<references/>

Revision as of 04:08, 11 May 2007

Allia Potestas was a freedwoman from the Roman town of Perugia who lived sometime during the 2nd-4th century CE.[1] She is known only through her epitaph, found on a marble tablet in Via Pinciana, Rome in 1912. The inscription, considered to be one of the most interesting of Latin epitaphs[2], is unique because it contains both typical epitaphic information and more personal and sexual details.[3]

Date

Much controversy surrounds the exact dating of the epigraph. Upon first discovery, the work was dated to around 300CE on paleographic grounds.


References

  1. ^ Horsfall, N: CIL VI 37965 = CLE 1988 (Epitaph of Allia Potestas): A Commentary, ZPE 61: 1985: pp251
  2. ^ Gordon, A.E: Illustrated Introduction to Latin Epigraphy: Berkely 1983
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference norsfall85 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).