Jump to content

The Revolt of Mamie Stover (film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted Visual edit
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted Visual edit
Line 57: Line 57:


==Production==
==Production==
In May 1955, it was reported that [[20th Century Fox]] had bought the rights to Huie's novel of the same name.<ref>"McCambridge in 'Giant;' Harvey, Conte Deals Set; 'Bride of India' Bought" by Edwin Schallert, ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', May 18, 1955. p. 7</ref> <[https://www.ultimatemovierankings.com/top-grossing-1956-movies/ 'https://www.ultimatemovierankings.com/top-grossing-1956-movies/']>
In May 1955, it was reported that [[20th Century Fox]] had bought the rights to Huie's novel of the same name.<ref>"McCambridge in 'Giant;' Harvey, Conte Deals Set; 'Bride of India' Bought" by Edwin Schallert, ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', May 18, 1955. p. 7</ref> <ref>{{Cite web |date=2017-11-30 |title=Top Grossing Movies of 1956 {{!}} Ultimate Movie Rankings |url=https://www.ultimatemovierankings.com/top-grossing-1956-movies/ |access-date=2024-12-05 |language=en-US}}</ref>[https://www.ultimatemovierankings.com/top-grossing-1956-movies/ 'https://www.ultimatemovierankings.com/top-grossing-1956-movies/']


>
>

Revision as of 18:45, 5 December 2024

{{Infobox film | name = The Revolt of Mamie Stover | image = Revolt of mamie stover.jpeg | caption = Original film poster | director = Raoul Walsh | producer = Buddy Adler | based_on = The Revolt of Mamie Stover
1951 novel
by William Bradford Huie | screenplay = Sydney Boehm | starring = Jane Russell
Richard Egan
Joan Leslie
Agnes Moorehead | music = Hugo Friedhofer | cinematography = Leo Tover | editing = Louis R. Loeffler | studio = Twentieth Century-Fox | distributor = Twentieth Century-Fox

| released =

  • May 11, 1956 (1956-05-11)

| runtime = 92 minutes | country = United States | language = English | budget = $2 million[1] | (US rentals).[2]gross = $5,700,000 Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page). [3]'https://www.ultimatemovierankings.com/top-grossing-1956-movies/'

>

The role of Mamie Stover originally was intended for Marilyn Monroe, but Marilyn was on "strike" with Fox over contact negotiations and was turning down many roles offered to her. The role eventually was offered to Jane Russell, whose confirmation was reported in November 1955. However, in the September 16, 1955 edition of The Southeast Missourian, Hollywood gossip columnist Erskine Johnson reported "Jane Russell has a date at Fox to discuss the possibility of starring in The Revolt of Mamie Stover. The paperback version sold 3,000,000 copies but there will have to be 3,000 censorship cuts if Mamie ever reaches the screen."

Other articles mentioned Rita Hayworth & Susan Hayward as contenders for the role of Mamie as well as Lana Turner but an extended vacation prohibited her from taking the part.[4] Joan Leslie was assigned to co-star in December.[5]

An expository opening scene was filmed but deleted for censorship reasons: On a street corner in San Francisco, Mamie is picked up by Howard Sloan, a middle-aged man portrayed by Stubby Kaye, and then detained by police who suggest she get out of town. One of the police officers is portrayed by Hugh Beaumont who can be seen briefly in the finished film at the beginning before the credits roll and at the very end when Mamie returns to San Francisco.

In the novel, Mamie Stover was described as a blonde, resembling actress Lizabeth Scott. However, producer Buddy Adler believed audiences would be thrown if Russell, one of the more famous brunettes in Hollywood, went blonde so he had Jane become a redhead. Russell wore a long red wig, but dyed her short natural black hair red along with her eyebrows.[6]

Filming took place partially on location in Honolulu. The remainder of the scenes were shot on the lot of Fox. The film was Joan Leslie's final film appearance before retiring from the screen.

Box office

In its list of the 100 top box-office hits of 1956, Variety Weekly (January 2, 1957 issue) ranked The Revolt of Mamie Stover at #44 for the year in box office rentals earning $2 million. The June 18, 1956 issue of Time reported the film at #3 as one of "the most popular and successful movies in the U.S. last month, according to the tradesheet Variety" coming in behind Alfred Hitchcock's The Man Who Knew Too Much and The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit.[7]. While not a "blockbuster," the film posted a profit for 20th Century Fox [8]

Hollywood gossip columnist Hedda Hopper wrote in her May 17, 1956 column: "Since the success of 'Mamie Stover,' Buddy Adler has signed Raoul Walsh to three more pictures at 20th Century Fox, and is trying to buy one of Jane Russell's commitments from Howard Hughes so he can star Jane in a romantic musical." Raoul Walsh's next three pictures for 20th Century Fox were The Sheriff of Fractured Jaw (1958); A Private's Affair (1959) and Esther and the King (1960). He made one more film for Fox, Marines, Let's Go released in 1961. Apparently Adler wasn't able to secure a deal with Hughes for Russell's services. Jane wouldn't appear in a Fox film until 1964's Fate Is the Hunter, and her role was a cameo appearing as herself.

Marilyn Ann Moss in her biography titled Raoul Walsh: The True Adventures of Hollywood's Legendary Director wrote: "Mamie Stover enjoyed good box office and afterward built a large international following."

Critical response

Upon its initial release, The Revolt of Mamie Stover received mostly poor reviews. Criticism focused on the film's sanitizing of the novel's original content. The headline of the Los Angeles Times review on the May 7, 1956 stated: "Mamie Stover's Revolt Suppressed by Censors". Bosley Crowther of the New York Times wrote a scathing review and made reference to the film's ad campaign which asked "Why Did Mamie Leave San Francisco?" His opening line of the review: "If you must know why Mamie Stover had to leave San Francisco, you'll have to ask someone other than this reviewer, who did not get the answer from the film..."

Gossip columnist Walter Winchell tried to soften the critical blows with a blurb in his syndicated column: "The Revolt of Mamie Stover, considerably laundered from the book, is a more entertaining movie than the reviews indicated. Richard Egan is a refreshing actor. Jane Russell and Agnes Moorehead are the other reasons it romps along." Photoplay in its review gave it three out of four stars and wrote "Jane Russell does a spirited job in a story that has both corny and realistic aspects" concluding, "A couple of gay songs enliven the unsavory proceedings."[9]

Contemporary critics reappraised the film as a whole, its director and as well as Jane Russell's performance.[clarification needed]

Italian film historian Ermanno Comuzio wrote in 1982 "The story of this 'rebellious woman' is 'explosive.' Jane Russell perfectly incarnates an unusual female character with her fighter’s broad shoulders. She is the female equivalent of the implacable and conquering hero who wants to take the world in her fist...The Revolt of Mamie Stover is an unconventional film, typical of Walsh’s last period, when he had even less patience with red tape and was more explicit in his speech, more focused on his filming, as well as the dismantling of the internal mechanisms of the more typical and standardised Hollywood filmmaking, and so of his own cinema."

Filmmaker Peter Bogdanovich wrote in 1965: "Very good...fascinating, ambiguously told story of a tough, flamboyant prostitute, her expulsion from San Francisco, her affair with a 'respectable' writer, her rise to wealth on the war in Hawaii. Very cleverly written and played to avoid the censors, but clear in its meanings and in Mamie’s lack of regeneration. Perfectly cast with Jane Russell, Richard Egan, directed with typical Walshian vigor and spirit; an amusing and devastating character study, with Russell staring at camera in the beginning (as opposed to the end as in Bergman’s Monika), defying the viewer to judge her."

Gary Tooze writing a review of the Blu-ray release of the film for DVDBeaver website "The Revolt of Mamie Stover has adult themes, female empowerment, war and romance. It offers an impressive, tough girl, performance from Russell. I love the film's exotic look, extravagant costumes and mixed genres."

Home media

The Revolt of Mamie Stover was released in movie theaters in May 1956. It wasn't until July 17, 2018, that the film received its first U.S. home video release. The boutique video company Twilight Time released a limited-edition (3,000 units) blu-ray disc of a 4k restoration, which has renewed interested in the film.

Soundtrack

In May 1956 RCA-Victor RCA Records released The Ames Brothers recording of the film's song "If You Wanna See Mamie Tonight" by Paul Francis Webster and Sammy Fain as the b-side to "It Only Hurts for a Little While". The song peaked at #89 on the Billboard Charts. Also in May 1956 Capitol Records released a single of the film's two songs "Keep Your Eyes on the Hands" by Tony Tordaro and Mary Johnston and "If You Wanna See Mamie Tonight" with Jane Russell performing the vocals backed by the Nelson Riddle Orchestra.

In 2006, the Intrada Records, an independent label, released a CD of Hugo Friedhofer's soundtrack of The Revolt of Mamie Stover along with David Raksin's soundtrack for Hilda Crane, another 20th Century Fox film also from 1956. This CD is no longer in print.

See also

References

  1. ^ Solomon, Aubrey. Twentieth Century Fox: A Corporate and Financial History (The Scarecrow Filmmakers Series). Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press, 1989. ISBN 978-0-8108-4244-1. p250
  2. ^ 'The Top Box-Office Hits of 1956', Variety Weekly, January 2, 1957
  3. ^ "Top Grossing Movies of 1956 | Ultimate Movie Rankings". 2017-11-30. Retrieved 2024-12-05.
  4. ^ Louella Parsons, "Jane Russell Gets Marilyn's Role," Milwaukee Sentinel, November 5, 1955. p. 14
  5. ^ "Simenon to Earn $3,000 Daily Wage; Prolific Novelist Is Planning 15-Day Task of Adapting 'Hitch Hikers' for Film", The New York Times, December 2, 1955. p. 32
  6. ^ "Jane Russell to Be Redhead in Next Movie", TimesDaily, December 6, 1955. p. 4 (section two).
  7. ^ Time, June 18, 1956
  8. ^ "Top Grossing Movies of 1956 | Ultimate Movie Rankings". 2017-11-30. Retrieved 2024-12-05.
  9. ^ Photoplay, August 1956