User talk:Parker.Josh

Welcome!

Hello, Parker.Josh!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Huntthetroll (talk) 19:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, thank you for the feedback. Parker.Josh (talk) 07:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in François Grimaldi, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. LucasR muteacc (talk) 22:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. Unfortunately you had reverted various citations that I had provided, relevant to this article that is needed. I have reverted back on this basis to edit the content according to Manual of Style guidelines you have mentioned. That being said, if you would be willing to contribute to improve the article in question along these lines, it would greatly appreciated. Kind Regards Parker.Josh (talk) 13:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Additionally, would you be able to specify and elaborate which particular edits you find to be non-compliant with MOS. Thank you Parker.Josh (talk) 13:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Sources

Hi. I was trying to format some of the references that you have added to Sermorelin and CJC-1295, however I have become quite concerned because most of the references that you have added seem to be completely made up. The DOIs that you have provided are non functional (e.g., doi:10.1007/s40618-017-0742-9). Searching Google Scholar for your references yield no hits. Hence these sources do not seem to exist. Hence I have reverted your edits in these two articles and I am in the process of reviewing the rest of the articles that you have edited. We welcome your contributions, but they must be supported by reliable sources that exist. Thank you. ‎ Boghog (talk) 17:09, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, thank you for the feedback. Unfortunately I had used a secondary source to generate these codes in APA style per reference to adhere to the Wikipedia guidelines and was created using the automatic citation creation tool. I am unsure how this information could have been "made up"' in the extent of detail I obtained from online sources correlating with Wikipedia itself to generate the format. There must have been an error in the code input. Perhaps certain articles have been subsequently removed in light of discontinued use or trials. That being said, any abnormalities was purely a referencing oversight. Thank you for making me aware of this. I will double check for anything lost in translation and cite manually. Thank you for your assistance. Parker.Josh (talk) 14:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ancient Greece, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fragmented. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)