Jump to content

User talk:Robertsky: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
Line 88: Line 88:


:@[[User:Valereee|Valereee]], personally I prefer to have WMF-related legal cases (even though it is uncommon compared to the other legal cases that are written here) only to be written in the mainspace after the case is over for various reasons. One of the many reasons is its potential to influence ongoing cases, [https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/delhi-high-court-slams-wikipedia-refusal-divulge-identity-those-edited-ani-page like] [https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-wikipedia-ani-defamation-cant-threaten-judge-272349 so]; potentially shutting off/opening up possible legal strategies that trial lawyers (on both sides, and now the judiciary as a whole apparently?) can apply and whatever extra scrutiny it may place on our fellow editors living the country. But hey... [[Pierre-sur-Haute_military_radio_station#Censorship_on_Wikipedia_and_unwanted_attention|what's done is done]]. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky#top|talk]]) 10:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:Valereee|Valereee]], personally I prefer to have WMF-related legal cases (even though it is uncommon compared to the other legal cases that are written here) only to be written in the mainspace after the case is over for various reasons. One of the many reasons is its potential to influence ongoing cases, [https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/delhi-high-court-slams-wikipedia-refusal-divulge-identity-those-edited-ani-page like] [https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/delhi-high-court-wikipedia-ani-defamation-cant-threaten-judge-272349 so]; potentially shutting off/opening up possible legal strategies that trial lawyers (on both sides, and now the judiciary as a whole apparently?) can apply and whatever extra scrutiny it may place on our fellow editors living the country. But hey... [[Pierre-sur-Haute_military_radio_station#Censorship_on_Wikipedia_and_unwanted_attention|what's done is done]]. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky#top|talk]]) 10:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
:Nonetheless, thanks for the article since it now presents a timeline. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky#top|talk]]) 10:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:48, 14 October 2024

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move Draft: William Heffernan by Spactues to be placed into article space 29 september 2024

Looking for help of my first artical Draft: William Heffernan by Spactues to be moved to the artical space and accepted review. Spactues (talk) 04:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-40

MediaWiki message delivery 22:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Avemalakoff (13:15, 5 October 2024)

Hello: Thanks for your help. There is a new book on the mystery about the Man in the Iron Mask written by me, Sarah Madry, M.Ed. On the Wikipedia page on this topic there is a list of books about this topic. I would like to have my book listed on the list. Since the editors investigate, quite normally and appropriately, the level of accuracy and seriousness of authors and material that appear on Wikipedia (I depend upon you to do that as a regular user of Wikipedia - thank you), I wrote to another editor who responded to me about adding my book to the list about the depth of my research and the new paths covered on the subject. I think that was interpreted as a promotion of my book that I intended to put on the Wikipedia page. I don't want to promote my book, unless putting the book on the list of other books, is promotion. I wanted to show the editor that my book is a serious work that offers dependable new material. I am sorry if that was the wrong thing to do. I have never done this before and I didn't know I was not supposed to do this. I apologize. I hope Wikipedia will be able to list my book as a book on this topic. Sarah Madry --Avemalakoff (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-41

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI vs WMF

Your Signpost article made me wonder why we didn't have Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation. Now we do. I love it when that happens, so thanks! Valereee (talk) 18:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Valereee, personally I prefer to have WMF-related legal cases (even though it is uncommon compared to the other legal cases that are written here) only to be written in the mainspace after the case is over for various reasons. One of the many reasons is its potential to influence ongoing cases, like so; potentially shutting off/opening up possible legal strategies that trial lawyers (on both sides, and now the judiciary as a whole apparently?) can apply and whatever extra scrutiny it may place on our fellow editors living the country. But hey... what's done is done. – robertsky (talk) 10:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nonetheless, thanks for the article since it now presents a timeline. – robertsky (talk) 10:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]