Jump to content

Talk:NASA: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
Revert off topic post. Talk pages are meant for article improvement and related activities.
Line 118: Line 118:
I’m new to this article. Wanted to float this by some experienced contributors to this article. I saw this interesting tidbit about a floating railway to the moon NASA might do. Would we want to add this? (https://www.autoblog.com/2024/05/21/nasa-wants-to-build-a-floating-railway-on-the-moon/) Thanks! [[User:Hannahthom7|Hannahthom7]] ([[User talk:Hannahthom7|talk]]) 14:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
I’m new to this article. Wanted to float this by some experienced contributors to this article. I saw this interesting tidbit about a floating railway to the moon NASA might do. Would we want to add this? (https://www.autoblog.com/2024/05/21/nasa-wants-to-build-a-floating-railway-on-the-moon/) Thanks! [[User:Hannahthom7|Hannahthom7]] ([[User talk:Hannahthom7|talk]]) 14:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
:There is quite a bit of [https://www.google.com/search?q=flaoting+railway+moon&rlz=1CAIGZW%20enCA1111&oq=flaoting+railway+moon&gs%20lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIJCAEQIRgKGKABMgkIAhAhGAoYoAEyCQgDECEYChigAdIBCDM1ODBqMGo0qAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 news coverage], I would say yes but it should be limited to a single sentence at least on this page. [[User:Cocobb8|'''<span style="color:purple">Coco</span><span style="color:green">bb8</span>''']] (💬 [[User talk:Cocobb8|talk]] • ✏️ [[Special:Contributions/Cocobb8|contribs]]) 14:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
:There is quite a bit of [https://www.google.com/search?q=flaoting+railway+moon&rlz=1CAIGZW%20enCA1111&oq=flaoting+railway+moon&gs%20lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIJCAEQIRgKGKABMgkIAhAhGAoYoAEyCQgDECEYChigAdIBCDM1ODBqMGo0qAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 news coverage], I would say yes but it should be limited to a single sentence at least on this page. [[User:Cocobb8|'''<span style="color:purple">Coco</span><span style="color:green">bb8</span>''']] (💬 [[User talk:Cocobb8|talk]] • ✏️ [[Special:Contributions/Cocobb8|contribs]]) 14:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

turculance above portland [[Special:Contributions/2600:100F:B1BA:BF1:0:11:5C5F:3C01|2600:100F:B1BA:BF1:0:11:5C5F:3C01]] ([[User talk:2600:100F:B1BA:BF1:0:11:5C5F:3C01|talk]]) 18:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:20, 5 August 2024

Former good articleNASA was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 8, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
June 9, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 28, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
June 15, 2020Good article reassessmentDelisted
June 8, 2024Good article reassessmentNot listed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 1, 2004, October 1, 2005, October 1, 2006, July 29, 2008, July 29, 2009, July 29, 2010, July 29, 2013, July 29, 2016, and July 29, 2018.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of October 2, 2005.
Current status: Delisted good article

Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2024

Change ESDMD Associate administrator from James Free to Catherine A. Koerner

Change SOMD Associate administrator from Kathy Lueders to Kenneth D. Bowersox

Change STMD Associate administrator from James L. Reuter to Kurt "Spuds" Vogel Montanot (talk) 04:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These changes have been announced and are reflected in the NASA bio pages:
I'm not certain whether these sources, rather than secondary sources as currently used, are preferred for this. Are there reliable secondary sources easily available? (sdsds - talk) 04:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me that in this context the use of a primary source falls within the criteria of both WP:PRIMARY and WP:ABOUTSELF. — FenrisAureus (she/they) (talk) 15:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneFenrisAureus (she/they) (talk) 15:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

typo of the word apollo

in the moon landing section, at paragraph 5, line 4, the word apollo is spelled appollo. could somebody fix that quick Andpug1 (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. YBSOne (talk) 16:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Work on bringing to Good Article

Hello all! I will be starting work to bring this article to a good article status over the next couple of weeks. Any suggestions, comments, concerns welcome below! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The final two paragraphs of the "Moon landing" subsection don't really seem to belong there. The second paragraph should also be reworded and expanded. Ships & Space(Edits) 21:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ships&Space, thanks for the thoughts! Do you think the last two paragraphs be kept in the NASA article to another section or deleted altogether? Will work on re-wording/expanding second paragraph. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 23:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits For Review

Hello there,

I posted some edits to the NASA Research Park talk page and would appreciate if someone could take a look. Thank you.

2601:646:100:E880:CED:6845:1D02:6D48 (talk) 17:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

floating railway on the moon

@Cocobb8, @SpaceHist65, @SpaceHist65,

I’m new to this article. Wanted to float this by some experienced contributors to this article. I saw this interesting tidbit about a floating railway to the moon NASA might do. Would we want to add this? (https://www.autoblog.com/2024/05/21/nasa-wants-to-build-a-floating-railway-on-the-moon/) Thanks! Hannahthom7 (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is quite a bit of news coverage, I would say yes but it should be limited to a single sentence at least on this page. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]