User talk:BilledMammal/Al Jazeera RFC: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
CapnJackSp (talk | contribs) →Draft RfC: reply to Berchanhimez |
→Draft RfC: Reply |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I am personally leery of including the "obvious bias" of things like the Qatar government in the same RfC - since it may lead to people saying "well, they're not reliable on that but that's their only obvious bias so they're reliable on the other things". That said, people are likely to bring that up so it's whatever. It may be prudent to specify that it is the English Al Jazeera being considered here. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez ([[User:Berchanhimez|User]]/[[User talk:Berchanhimez|say hi!]]) 03:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
:I am personally leery of including the "obvious bias" of things like the Qatar government in the same RfC - since it may lead to people saying "well, they're not reliable on that but that's their only obvious bias so they're reliable on the other things". That said, people are likely to bring that up so it's whatever. It may be prudent to specify that it is the English Al Jazeera being considered here. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez ([[User:Berchanhimez|User]]/[[User talk:Berchanhimez|say hi!]]) 03:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
::I would second that, as providing an obvious step might prevent people from seriously considering the other, less obvious questions. Thats best left for a second RFC, perhaps a follow on to this one? [[User:CapnJackSp|Captain Jack Sparrow]] ([[User talk:CapnJackSp|talk]]) 13:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
::I would second that, as providing an obvious step might prevent people from seriously considering the other, less obvious questions. Thats best left for a second RFC, perhaps a follow on to this one? [[User:CapnJackSp|Captain Jack Sparrow]] ([[User talk:CapnJackSp|talk]]) 13:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Al Jazeera English is a good remark. [[User:Bharel|Bar Harel]] ([[User talk:Bharel|talk]]) 23:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:21, 29 July 2024
Draft RfC
@Newslinger, CapnJackSp, Bharel, and Berchanhimez: Thoughts on this format? BilledMammal (talk) 11:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Lgtm, "general topics" mb. Bar Harel (talk) 19:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I am personally leery of including the "obvious bias" of things like the Qatar government in the same RfC - since it may lead to people saying "well, they're not reliable on that but that's their only obvious bias so they're reliable on the other things". That said, people are likely to bring that up so it's whatever. It may be prudent to specify that it is the English Al Jazeera being considered here. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 03:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- I would second that, as providing an obvious step might prevent people from seriously considering the other, less obvious questions. Thats best left for a second RFC, perhaps a follow on to this one? Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 13:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Al Jazeera English is a good remark. Bar Harel (talk) 23:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)