1604 Arica earthquake

1604 Arica earthquake

Lima Arica Arequipa
UTC time	1604-11-24 18:30:00
Local date	November 24, 1604 (1604-11-24)
Local time	13:30
Magnitude	Mw8.7–9.0
Depth	30 km (19 mi)
Epicenter	18.5°S 70.4°W / -18.5; -70.4
Fault	Peru-Chile Trench
Type	Megathrust
Areas affected	Arica, (then part of Chile), Arequipa, Peru
Max. intensity	MMI XI (Extreme)
Tsunami	Yes
Casualties	100+

The 1604 Arica earthquake is an earthquake that occurred at 1:30 pm on November 24, 1604, offshore Arica, Chile (formerly part of the Spanish Empire). The estimated magnitude range is M_s8.0–8.5 and up to M_w8.7–9.0 and M_t8.8–9.0. It had a destructive tsunami that destroyed moust of Southern Peru, including Arica and Arequipa. 1,200–2,800 km (750–1,740 mi) of coastline was affected by the tsunami. The recorded effects of this earthquake are very similar to those for the 1868 Arica event, suggesting a similar magnitude and rupture area of the megathrust between the subducting Nazca Plate and the overriding South American Plate. Tsunami deposits have been identified on the Chatham Islands that are likely to have been caused by a trans-Pacific tsunami caused by the 1604 earthquake.

Tectonic setting

Off the coasts of Peru and Chile, the Nazca plate subducts underneath the South American plate along the Peru-Chile Trench. At the location of the earthquake, the convergence rate between the two plates is 6.0 cm (2 in)/year. Large events at the plate boundary are relatively common, with similar large earthquakes occurring in 1687, 1784, 1868, and 2001. In the area of the earthquake, the Nazca Ridge functions as a semi-persistent rupture barrier. This inhibits the ability for most earthquakes to continue rupturing through this area. As a result, this earthquake cycle is considered to be bimodal, which means that the recurring earthquake is either a large (up to M_w 8.5) or a truly giant (M_w 9.0) earthquake. Only the 1604 and 1868 events are considered to have been the latter truly colossal events.

Earthquake

Little is known about the earthquake, but it is interpreted to be similar in size and faulting to the 1868 Arica earthquake. The cities of Arequipa, Tacna, and Moquegua experienced shaking of Modified Mercalli Intensity VIII, while Cuzco and Ica experienced VI shaking. Shaking was strongly felt in Lima. The rupture length is thought to be between 400–450 km (249–280 mi) long. It is believed that the 1604 event was unable to rupture north of the Nazca Ridge, which means that only the absolute largest earthquakes (such as 1868) can pass through this semi-persistent rupture barrier.

Tsunami

The tsunami was widespread and impacted many countries. The tsunami, along with the 1868 event, is considered one of "the greatest historical tsunami events along the Perú-Chile Trench" and "among the greatest tsunamis ever observed in the Pacific ocean". Tsunami run-ups height were estimated to be around 16 m (52 ft) high. It was recorded along at least 1,200 km (746 mi) and potentially up to 2,800 km (1,740 mi) of coastline in South America between Lima and Concepción. Weak waves arrived in Northern Peru. At Arica, the tsunami indundated up to 10 km (6.2 mi) inland. In Oceania, the Chatham Islands have recorded what is very likely evidence of tsunami from this event as well.

Damage

Arica was destroyed and rebuilt after the earthquake, while Arequipa was so severely damaged that only the San Francisco monastery remained standing. Camaná, Moquegua, and Tacna suffered major devastation. In Pausa, a majority of houses were destroyed. In Pisco, only certain parts of the town experienced major damage. The city of Ica was slightly damaged despite being far from the rupture area. Landslides reportedly occurred between the latitudes of 15.5 and 18.5S. Other ground deformations such as cracks and liquefactions occurred as well. Damage was reported across the Pacific ocean. Overall, damages from the earthquake were comparable to the 1868 earthquake.

See also

• 1868 Arica earthquake
• List of earthquakes in Peru

Sources

• Comte, Diana; Pardo, M. (1 March 1991). "Reappraisal of great historical earthquakes in the Northern Chile and Southern Peru seismic gaps". Natural Hazards. 4 (1): 23–44. Bibcode:1991NatHa...4...23C. doi:10.1007/BF00126557. S2CID 140190546. Retrieved 27 July 2022.
• Dorbath, L.; Cisternas, A.; Dorbath, C. (1 June 1990). "Assessment of the size of large and great historical earthquakes in Peru". Bulletin of the Seismological Society. 80 (3): 551–576. doi:10.1785/BSSA0800030551. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
• Giovanni, Melissa K.; Beck, Susan L.; Wagner, Lara (6 November 2002). "The June 23, 2001 Peru earthquake and the southern Peru subduction zone". Geophysical Research Letters. 29 (21): 14-1–14-4.
• Goff, J.; Nichol, S.; Chagué-Goff, C.; Horrocks, M.; McFadgen, B.; Cisternas, M. (2010). "Predecessor to New Zealand's largest historic trans-South Pacific tsunami of 1868 AD". Marine Geology. 275 (1–4): 155–165. Bibcode:2010MGeol.275..155G. doi:10.1016/j.margeo.2010.05.006.
• Kulikov, Evgueni A.; Rabinovich, Alexander B.; Thomson, Richard E. (June 2005). "Estimation of Tsunami Risk for the Coasts of Peru and Northern Chile". Natural Hazards. 35 (2): 185–209. Bibcode:2005NatHa..35..185K. doi:10.1007/s11069-004-4809-3. S2CID 140620121. Retrieved 7 November 2022.
• Lomnitz, C. (2004). "Major Earthquakes of Chile: A Historical Survey, 1535–1960". Seismological Research Letters. 75 (3): 368–378. Bibcode:2004SeiRL..75..368L. doi:10.1785/gssrl.75.3.368.
• Loveless, J. P.; Pritchard, M. E.; Kukowski, N. (22 November 2010). "Testing mechanisms of subduction zone segmentation and seismogenesis with slip distributions from recent Andean earthquakes". Tectonophysics. 495 (1–2): 15–33. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2009.05.008. ISSN 0040-1951. Retrieved 9 July 2024.
• Okal, E.A.; Borrero, J.C.; Synolakis, C.E. (2006). "Evaluation of Tsunami Risk from Regional Earthquakes at Pisco, Peru". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 96 (5): 1634–1648. Bibcode:2006BuSSA..96.1634O. doi:10.1785/0120050158.
• Spiske, Michaela; Piepenbreier, Jens; Benavente, Carlos; Kunz, Alexander; Bahlburg, Heinrich; Steffahn, Jens (14 August 2013). "Historical tsunami deposits in Peru: Sedimentology, inverse modeling and optically stimulated luminescence dating". Quaternary International. 305: 31–44. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2013.02.010. ISSN 1040-6182. Retrieved 9 July 2024.
• Villegas-Lanza, J. C.; Chlieh, M.; Cavalié, O.; Tavera, H.; Baby, P.; Chire-Chira, J.; Nocquet, J.-M. (24 September 2016). "Active tectonics of Peru: Heterogeneous interseismic coupling along the Nazca megathrust, rigid motion of the Peruvian Sliver, and Subandean shortening accommodation". J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 121 (10): 7371–7394. Bibcode:2016JGRB..121.7371V. doi:10.1002/2016JB013080. S2CID 132735222. Retrieved 26 July 2022.
• Wong, Ivan; Dober, Mark; Pezzopane, Silvio; Thomas, Patricia; Terra, Fabia (1 January 2012). Seismic hazard above the South America subduction zone in Southern Peru (PDF). 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal. Retrieved 26 July 2022.