Talk:Minecraft: Difference between revisions
→Infobox changes: Reply |
NegativeMP1 (talk | contribs) →Infobox changes: Reply |
||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
::But I agree with the second developer point!! [[User:Squid45|Squid45]] ([[User talk:Squid45|talk]]) 12:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |
::But I agree with the second developer point!! [[User:Squid45|Squid45]] ([[User talk:Squid45|talk]]) 12:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
::I think he changed Minecraft's cover art to the game's logo because Minecraft recently changed their cover art, and there were too many choices to see which cover art would be chosen to be included in the article [[User:Hoangminhle2011|Hoangminhle2011]] ([[User talk:Hoangminhle2011|talk]]) 13:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |
::I think he changed Minecraft's cover art to the game's logo because Minecraft recently changed their cover art, and there were too many choices to see which cover art would be chosen to be included in the article [[User:Hoangminhle2011|Hoangminhle2011]] ([[User talk:Hoangminhle2011|talk]]) 13:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Typically on Wikipedia, articles for video games/albums/movies generally go with either the original release artwork, or the most recognizable. Minecraft doesn't have either of those, since it technically didn't launch with cover art until the Xbox 360 release in 2012 and there's no real contender for the "most recognizable" box art. We could go back to the original Bedrock Edition box art with the caption "Original ''Bedrock Edition'' box art" if needed, but I feel like the logo which is common place across all box arts and predates any of them is better. It's also certainly better than the new cover art, which is yet to be included on any physical copies of the game (compared to the other cover arts tens of millions). <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' [[User:NegativeMP1|<span style="color:#264e85">'''Negative'''</span>]][[User talk:NegativeMP1|<span style="color:#7d43b5">'''MP1'''</span>]]</span> 17:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:16, 6 July 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Minecraft article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Minecraft" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Q1: Why doesn't this article have more information on blocks/crafting/mobs/entities/mods than it does?
A1: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, nor is it a how-to guide. Articles should strive to present a broad overview of their subjects. Video game articles in particular try to describe general mechanics and gameplay instead of specific details. This helps to keep the article accessible to readers who may not otherwise be familiar with Minecraft. Q2: Why doesn't this article show the prices?
A2: Wikipedia is not a directory. Product prices should not be quoted in an article unless they can be sourced and there is a justified reason for their mention. In general, if mainstream media sources (not just product reviews) provide commentary on the price of an object instead of just passing mention, this is an indication that its price may have encyclopedic significance. Prices listed by individual vendors, on the other hand, can vary widely from place to place and over time. Wikipedia is not a price comparison service to be used to compare the prices of competing products, or the prices of a single product from different vendors. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Minecraft. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Minecraft at the Reference desk. |
Minecraft was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 03/22-2018 by Netoholic.
|
Wikipedia is not a strategy guide or instruction manual. Wikipedia articles should focus on the games themselves, not on how to play them; they should not contain tips, tricks, or cheat codes. That information is available elsewhere (such as on our sister project, Wikibooks), in printed guides and online, and does not belong in an encyclopedia entry. Please do not add your own hints or opinions of the game. Verifiable content about the history, design, and overall description of the game is welcome. If you have questions about whether specific information should be added, ask here first. |
Other talk page banners | |||
|
Mob Vote Controversy
Adding a section for the Mob Vote controversy could be useful because it is quite significant. TheT.N.T.BOOM! (talk) 13:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- And for those of us unfamiliar with the controversy, could you provide some details and some reliable sources to back them up? GSK (talk • edits) 14:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Added — Hoangminhle2011 — Shape our Wiki 05:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Infobox changes
I've BOLDLY made a number of changes to the infobox recently, since it was getting really hard to read when editing through source and had the risk of becoming unstable. These changes include:
- Replacing the games cover art with the games logo. I've done this because, while there are several different cover arts, and the previous "most recognizable" one (which we generally go with on Wikipedia, if not the original one) had been replaced, the logo has generally been the same since the games initial release in 2011, and is present across most if not all 300 million copies of the game.
- Simplifying the infobox to not list every single developer and composer. The documentation of Template:Infobox video game states to only list the games primary developers and publishers, which in this instance boils down to only Mojang and Xbox Game Studios. So I've compressed all other developers, publishers, and composers into hatnotes in their respective sections.
- I've also removed citations from the infobox per WP:CITELEAD, and also the fact the infobox was becoming impossible to view in source editing.
Please let me know if anyone disagrees with any of the changes I've made. λ NegativeMP1 23:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is NOT the logo of the game, this is the Minecraft (franchise) logo.
- The game logo is here Hoangminhle2011 (talk) 02:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't recognize them as different (I thought the main game logo was changed earlier this year?), uploading the individual game logo right now. λ NegativeMP1 03:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree with these changes, I feel the game's cover art is needed... I don't really understand why you've changed it though. Could you explain in greater detail? Squid45 (talk) 12:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- But I agree with the second developer point!! Squid45 (talk) 12:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think he changed Minecraft's cover art to the game's logo because Minecraft recently changed their cover art, and there were too many choices to see which cover art would be chosen to be included in the article Hoangminhle2011 (talk) 13:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Typically on Wikipedia, articles for video games/albums/movies generally go with either the original release artwork, or the most recognizable. Minecraft doesn't have either of those, since it technically didn't launch with cover art until the Xbox 360 release in 2012 and there's no real contender for the "most recognizable" box art. We could go back to the original Bedrock Edition box art with the caption "Original Bedrock Edition box art" if needed, but I feel like the logo which is common place across all box arts and predates any of them is better. It's also certainly better than the new cover art, which is yet to be included on any physical copies of the game (compared to the other cover arts tens of millions). λ NegativeMP1 17:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- Former good article nominees
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Everyday life
- C-Class vital articles in Everyday life
- C-Class video game articles
- High-importance video game articles
- C-Class indie game articles
- Indie video game task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- C-Class Sweden articles
- Low-importance Sweden articles
- All WikiProject Sweden pages
- C-Class Internet culture articles
- High-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- C-Class Microsoft articles
- High-importance Microsoft articles
- WikiProject Microsoft articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors