Jump to content

Talk:Murder of Seth Rich: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by 71.31.255.53 (talk): It's about the murder, not the person, and this isn't a forum
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 71: Line 71:


:{{u|Jawz101}}, what are you referring to? Because if it's {{tq|The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post wrote that the promotion of these conspiracy theories was an example of fake news}}, those "3 websites" are [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], which means it is [[WP:V|verified content]]. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 17:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
:{{u|Jawz101}}, what are you referring to? Because if it's {{tq|The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post wrote that the promotion of these conspiracy theories was an example of fake news}}, those "3 websites" are [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], which means it is [[WP:V|verified content]]. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 17:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 28 June 2024 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Murder of Seth Rich|answered=no}}
[[Special:Contributions/194.230.144.152|194.230.144.152]] ([[User talk:194.230.144.152|talk]]) 10:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fuck you poor ass livkers. Soules cockroaches. Is 5his ok, mother shit eaters?

Revision as of 10:56, 28 June 2024

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 19, 2016Articles for deletionNo consensus
September 15, 2016WikiProject approved revisionDiff to current version
October 4, 2016Articles for deletionNo consensus
January 21, 2017Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
February 26, 2017WikiProject approved revisionDiff to current version
May 30, 2017WikiProject approved revisionDiff to current version

poor quality

The amount of conjecture in this article is astounding. "3 websites say something is true, so that means something is true." Jawz101 (talk) 16:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jawz101, what are you referring to? Because if it's The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post wrote that the promotion of these conspiracy theories was an example of fake news, those "3 websites" are reliable sources, which means it is verified content. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 June 2024

194.230.144.152 (talk) 10:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you poor ass livkers. Soules cockroaches. Is 5his ok, mother shit eaters?