Talk:Client Hints: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Sohom Datta (talk | contribs) Making GAN nomination (GAN-helper) |
Sohom Datta (talk | contribs) Nominated for DYK, see Template:Did you know nominations/Client Hints (DYK-wizard) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{WikiProject Internet |importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Internet |importance=Low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
==Did you know nomination== |
|||
{{Template:Did you know nominations/Client Hints}} |
|||
Revision as of 02:37, 3 June 2024
 | Client Hints is currently a Computing and engineering good article nominee. Nominated by Sohom (talk) at 19:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page. Short description: Extension to the HTTP protocol |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hey man im josh talk 15:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Google's Client Hints proposal was initially classified as "harmful" by Firefox?
- Source: Senol, Asuman; Acar, Gunes (2023-11-26). "Unveiling the Impact of User-Agent Reduction and Client Hints: A Measurement Study". WPES '23: Proceedings of the 22nd Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. ACM: 96. doi:10.1145/3603216.3624965. ISBN 979-8-4007-0235-8.
- ALT1: ... that Client Hints can be used to track you? Source: Senol, Asuman; Acar, Gunes (2023-11-26). "Unveiling the Impact of User-Agent Reduction and Client Hints: A Measurement Study". WPES '23: Proceedings of the 22nd Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. ACM: 102. doi:10.1145/3603216.3624965. ISBN 979-8-4007-0235-8.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jan Leike
5x expanded by Sohom Datta (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.
Sohom (talk) 02:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC).
New enough and long enough expansion. QPQ present. First thought is that Mozilla, not Firefox, would have been declaring CHs "harmful", Sohom Datta. The source says as much. Both hooks check out, but ALT0 and the article must be fixed before publication. (I do prefer ALT1 very slightly) Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds good, in practise Firefox and Mozilla are used interchangeably in the browser spec world, however, in this instance it does make sense to use what the source says. How about:
- ALT 0a: ... that the Client Hints proposal was initially classified as "harmful" by Mozilla?
- ALT 0b: ... that Google's Client Hints proposal was initially classified as "harmful" by Mozilla?
- Sammi Brie Let me know if you prefer the wording of one over the other :) Sohom (talk) 11:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Either ALT0a or ALT0b will work. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
