Jump to content

Wikipedia:Article content: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 3: Line 3:




An article on Wikipedia should contain content which causes that article to actually cover the stated topic of that article. The title of an article may be one significant ingredient, albeit an obvious one, in accurately deducing and determining the actual topic, scope, and focus of that article.
An article on Wikipedia should contain content which causes that article to actually cover the stated topic of that article. The title of an article is one significant ingredient, albeit an obvious one, in accurately deducing and determining the actual topic, scope, and focus of that article.


Perhaps it is germane to note that in [[logic]], the [[law of identity]] states that each thing is identical with itself. (It is the first of the historical [[Law of thought#The three traditional laws|three laws of thought]], along with the [[law of noncontradiction]], and the [[law of excluded middle]].)
Perhaps it is germane to note that in [[logic]], the [[law of identity]] states that each thing is identical with itself. (It is the first of the historical [[Law of thought#The three traditional laws|three laws of thought]], along with the [[law of noncontradiction]], and the [[law of excluded middle]].)

Revision as of 13:32, 18 August 2023


An article on Wikipedia should contain content which causes that article to actually cover the stated topic of that article. The title of an article is one significant ingredient, albeit an obvious one, in accurately deducing and determining the actual topic, scope, and focus of that article.

Perhaps it is germane to note that in logic, the law of identity states that each thing is identical with itself. (It is the first of the historical three laws of thought, along with the law of noncontradiction, and the law of excluded middle.)

Description

An article's topical focus and scope can be deduced from the title of the article. The content of the article can be greatly broadened, revised or altered, as long as it is germane and beneficial to maintaining the scope and content of the article, so that the article actually covers the stated topic of that article.

Examples

  • History of United States government. A topic that is self-evident in its notability; however, someone had to make a decision about the best way to actually approach this topic, and then someone had to actually write it. so this is one good example of the importance of the seemingly obvious fact that articles need to have content.

See also