Talk:Isotopes of lithium: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:42, 3 May 2023

Elements: Isotopes List‑class Low‑importance

	Chemistry portal This article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Isotope Taskforce.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Template:Vital article

Li8 Decay is Misleading

Li-8 decay is misleading. The footnote explains it's the equivalent of Spontaneous Fission with Positron emission, and lists the decay type as Alpha plus Beta- (positron). It seems to me it's more appropriate to say it uses Beta- plus Alpha decay and results in He4, not Be8. Does it spend any time at all in Be8, after all? TimeHorse (talk)

A new particle accelerator aims to unlock secrets of bizarre atomic nuclei

Here is an article on Lithium-11 with halo effect at A new particle accelerator aims to unlock secrets of bizarre atomic nuclei. Rjluna2 (talk) 19:41, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy in Abundances

The table in the article gives: Li-6 4.85%, Li-7 95.15% The pie chart gives: Li-6 7.59%, Li-7 92.41% 45.49.245.43 (talk) 21:31, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. I have removed the (2013) pie chart, abundances have changed / become more precise since. Especially for lithium btw (complicated spread of un/natural occurrances). Standard atomic weight, AME, is more current data. Thanks for the report. DePiep (talk) 23:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Percentage

Correct is — ⁶Li (7,5 %) and ⁷Li (92,5 %); incorrect — ⁶Li (4.85%) and ⁷Li (95.15%)! Why? Becouse standard atomic weight in first case will be 6.967460 and in second 6.940037. Please find source for second one. source for the first one is ruwiki. Surprizi (talk) 13:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 13:42, 3 May 2023 edit Surprizi (talk \| contribs) 181 edits →Percentage: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:42, 3 May 2023 edit undo Surprizi (talk \| contribs) 181 edits →Percentage Next edit →
Line 33:		Line 33:
	== Percentage ==		== Percentage ==

	Correct is — <sup>6</sup>Li (7,5 %) and <sup>7</sup>Li (92,5 %); '''~~not correct~~''' — <sup>6</sup>Li (4.85%) and <sup>7</sup>Li (95.15%)! Why? Becouse standard atomic weight in first case will be 6.967460 and in second 6.940037. Please find source for second one. source for the first one is [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%B7%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%8B_%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%8F ruwiki]. [[User:Surprizi\|Surprizi]] ([[User talk:Surprizi\|talk]]) 13:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)		Correct is — <sup>6</sup>Li (7,5 %) and <sup>7</sup>Li (92,5 %); '''incorrect''' — <sup>6</sup>Li (4.85%) and <sup>7</sup>Li (95.15%)! Why? Becouse standard atomic weight in first case will be 6.967460 and in second 6.940037. Please find source for second one. source for the first one is [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%B7%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%8B_%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%8F ruwiki]. [[User:Surprizi\|Surprizi]] ([[User talk:Surprizi\|talk]]) 13:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)