Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sector 13: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 05:29, 9 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was disintegrated. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:49, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sector 13

(Find video game sources: "Sector 13" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Lack of references. Unreleased computer game. (Developer's website, first ext link in article, says on indefinite hold.) been tagged for cleanup since 2007. RJFJR (talk) 22:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lack of third party sources, fails WP:GNG. Also, the article outright says that it's taking just about all info from their official site, which they keep linking to. Looks like too much of a promo piece... Sergecross73 msg me 14:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 20:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 :<small>Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Deletion|list of video game-related deletion discussions]]. ({{find video game sources short|Sector 13|linksearch=}}) [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 23:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Games|list of Games-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 23:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)</small>
-*'''Delete''' - Lack of third party sources, fails [[WP:GNG]]. Also, the article outright says that it's taking just about all info from their official site, which they keep linking to. Looks like too much of a promo piece... [[User:Sergecross73|<font color="green">Sergecross73</font>]] [[User talk:Sergecross73|<font color="teal">msg me</font>]]  14:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' - Lack of third party sources, fails [[WP:GNG]]. Also, the article outright says that it's taking just about all info from their official site, which they keep linking to. Looks like too much of a promo piece... [[User:Sergecross73|<span style="color:green;">Sergecross73</span>]] [[User talk:Sergecross73|<span style="color:teal;">msg me</span>]]  14:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' - No coverage in reliable sources. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 20:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>