Jump to content

Talk:Jon Moxley: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 27: Line 27:
Firstly, Jon Moxley has only held the IWGP United States Heavyweight Championship twice, per every official source so no idea as to who would make such as ludicrous claim. Second the source cited is not even remotely related or relevant stating his name while performing for NJPW was katakana. It does not provide any link and is merely an unsourced statement. Please help me get to the bottom of whoever did this [[User:DeepPurpleMule|DeepPurpleMule]] ([[User talk:DeepPurpleMule|talk]]) 23:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Firstly, Jon Moxley has only held the IWGP United States Heavyweight Championship twice, per every official source so no idea as to who would make such as ludicrous claim. Second the source cited is not even remotely related or relevant stating his name while performing for NJPW was katakana. It does not provide any link and is merely an unsourced statement. Please help me get to the bottom of whoever did this [[User:DeepPurpleMule|DeepPurpleMule]] ([[User talk:DeepPurpleMule|talk]]) 23:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)


:If you're referencing the third paragraph, it's combining his WWE US championships with his NJPW US championships. — '''[[User:Czello|<i style="color:#8000FF">Czello</i>]]''' 23:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
:If you're referencing the third paragraph, it's combining his WWE US championships with his NJPW US championships. Other articles do similar things, for example [[Chris Jericho]] saying he's a 10-time Intercontinental champion, which combines his WWE and NJPW reigns. — '''[[User:Czello|<i style="color:#8000FF">Czello</i>]]''' 23:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:31, 22 January 2023

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Jon Moxley/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 10:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Prose

Lede

General

GA Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

Thanks for the reply. I believe I have dealt all of the issues in the best manner possible, let me know when you can get around to having a look, @Lee Vilenski:. DTH89(sexy talk page) 10:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did a couple small edits and I'm happy to pass now. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. DTH89(sexy talk page) 12:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Three time US Champion???

Firstly, Jon Moxley has only held the IWGP United States Heavyweight Championship twice, per every official source so no idea as to who would make such as ludicrous claim. Second the source cited is not even remotely related or relevant stating his name while performing for NJPW was katakana. It does not provide any link and is merely an unsourced statement. Please help me get to the bottom of whoever did this DeepPurpleMule (talk) 23:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you're referencing the third paragraph, it's combining his WWE US championships with his NJPW US championships. Other articles do similar things, for example Chris Jericho saying he's a 10-time Intercontinental champion, which combines his WWE and NJPW reigns. — Czello 23:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]