Talk:Australian ten-cent coin: Difference between revisions
HagermanBot (talk | contribs) m Duja didn't sign: "Forgotten closing template" |
Enlil Ninlil (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom --> <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Duja|Duja]] ([[User talk:Duja|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Duja|contribs]]) 11:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom --> <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Duja|Duja]] ([[User talk:Duja|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Duja|contribs]]) 11:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
||
==Moves== |
|||
Hay can you people just stick to one heading and stop moving the pages. Wast of time. Thanks [[User:Enlil Ninlil|Enlil Ninlil]] 11:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:14, 26 February 2007
Numismatics Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Moved all to Australian X cent coin for internal consistency. Duja► 11:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
10c coin (Australian) → Ten cent coin (Australian) — A couple of days ago, Extra3 moved all the Australian banknotes and coins to alternative names. Personally I think the new new names are not as clear. Unfortunately, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (numbers and dates) have little on this topic, so there isn't one clear way to go. However, I should note that other currencies (eg. [1] [2]) use the "spelled out" method of page naming.
I asked Extra3 for his reasons on the page moves to which he replied on my talk page. His main reason seemed to be that people new to Wikipedia may type "$5" into the search box looking for the $5 note. Which I suppose is possible, but I think it would be better in this example to create a redirect $5 note (Australian) → Five dollar note (Australian). This way the article remains clear whilst at the same time making sure people typing in "$5" into the search box gets what they are looking for.
So, in conclusion - I would suggest these articles be moved back to their previous name, then redirects created on the "new" names. DWZ (talk • email • contribs) 03:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Please note that this is a "multiple page moves" request and also includes the following articles:
- 20c coin (Australian) → Twenty cent coin (Australian)
- 50c (round) coin (Australian) → Round fifty cent coin (Australian)
- 50c coin (Australian) → Fifty cent coin (Australian)
- $1 coin (Australian) → One dollar coin (Australian)
- $2 coin (Australian) → Two dollar coin (Australian)
- $1 note (Australian) → One dollar note (Australian)
- $2 note (Australian) → Two dollar note (Australian)
- $5 note (Australian) → Five dollar note (Australian)
- $10 note (Australian) → Ten dollar note (Australian)
- $20 note (Australian) → Twenty dollar note (Australian)
- $50 note (Australian) → Fifty dollar note (Australian)
- $100 note (Australian) → One hundred dollar note (Australian)
Survey
- Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
Survey - in support of the move
- Hesperian 03:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support - As above --DWZ (talk • email • contribs) 03:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Enlil Ninlil 04:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Yes, it was similar to that in the first place.
- Support Joe I 04:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support, but rather "Australian" should be prefixed, as in Australian ten cent coin. However, if the parenthetical form is to be retained, the n needs to be dropped. Chris cheese whine 17:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Survey - in opposition to the move
Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
Fix a class of problem, not an instance of a problem I will support a method that works globally. This issue has been raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics#Australian Article Name. But no consensus is reached. I would like to take this opportunity and list articles of individual denominations elsewhere so that global consistency is ensured.
euro
... (complete listing at {{Euro topics}}
USD
Obsolete
- Half cent (United States coin)
- Large cent (United States coin)
- Two-cent piece (United States coin)
- more at {{Obsolete U.S. currency and coinage}}
Current
(complete listing at {{US currency and coinage}}
...
CAD
(complete listing at {{Canadian currency and coinage}}
...
...
British
Pre-decimal
- British farthing coin
- British halfpenny coin
- British one penny coin (pre-decimal)
- British threepence coin
(complete listing at {{British coinage}}
Decimal
...
Irish
{{Irish currency and coinage}}
Japanese
Thai
{{Thailand currency and coinage}}
Nicaraguan
{{Nicaraguan currency and coinage}}
Danish
Some medieval
--ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 04:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Result: move to Australian 10 cent coin, as is practise for the majority of other coins. Asics talk 21:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- All have been moved to Australian X cent/dollar note/coin, except 50 cent coin, and 100 dollar note, as an admin needs to do those for some reason. Asics talk 21:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Duja (talk • contribs) 11:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC).
Moves
Hay can you people just stick to one heading and stop moving the pages. Wast of time. Thanks Enlil Ninlil 11:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)